Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2008

01-02-2008 | Original Article

Randomized Trials to Modify Patients’ Preoperative Expectations of Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

Authors: Carol A. Mancuso, MD, Suzanne Graziano, RN, Lisa M. Briskie, RN, Margaret G. E. Peterson, PhD, Paul M. Pellicci, MD, Eduardo A. Salvati, MD, Thomas P. Sculco, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Patients have multiple expectations of THA and TKA. We asked whether preoperative educational classes addressing recovery during the first year could modify patients’ expectations of their 12-month postoperative recovery. Participants were enrolled consecutively in two randomized, controlled trials, one for THA (177 patients) and one for TKA (143 patients). Control patients preoperatively received a standard THA or TKA class addressing recovery immediately after surgery. Intervention patients preoperatively received the standard class plus a joint-specific module addressing recovery during the first 12 months. Before and after the class, patients completed either a hip-specific or knee-specific validated expectations survey. The main outcome was the within-patient change in expectation scores (maximum increase, +100; maximum decrease, −100) before and after the class but preoperatively. Mean changes in hip scores were +3.3 ± 8 for intervention patients (range, −22–+32) and +4.9 ± 8 for control patients (range, −13–+29). Mean changes in knee scores were −3.4 ± 10 for intervention patients (range, −26–+33) and +2.4 ± 10 for control patients (range, −30–+30). Patients’ preoperative expectations of their recovery from THA or TKA can be modified by preoperative educational classes.
Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95–108. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95–108.
2.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Campbell J, Hill J, Band P. A comparative study of telephone versus onsite completion of the WOMAC 3.0 osteoarthritis index. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:783–786.PubMed Bellamy N, Campbell J, Hill J, Band P. A comparative study of telephone versus onsite completion of the WOMAC 3.0 osteoarthritis index. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:783–786.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chang HJ, Mehta PS, Rosenberg A, Scrimshaw SC. Concerns of patients actively contemplating total knee replacement: differences by race and gender. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:117–123.PubMedCrossRef Chang HJ, Mehta PS, Rosenberg A, Scrimshaw SC. Concerns of patients actively contemplating total knee replacement: differences by race and gender. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:117–123.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373–383.PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373–383.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengström A, Elmstedt E. Patient expectation of satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:457–462.PubMedCrossRef Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengström A, Elmstedt E. Patient expectation of satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:457–462.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Flood AB, Lorence DP, Ding J, McPherson K, Black NA. The role of expectations in patients’ reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy. Med Care. 1993;31:1043–1056.PubMedCrossRef Flood AB, Lorence DP, Ding J, McPherson K, Black NA. The role of expectations in patients’ reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy. Med Care. 1993;31:1043–1056.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Furstenberg AL. Expectations about outcome following hip fracture among older people. Soc Work Health Care. 1986;11:33–47.PubMedCrossRef Furstenberg AL. Expectations about outcome following hip fracture among older people. Soc Work Health Care. 1986;11:33–47.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Chambers GK, Jagpal TJ, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The expectations of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:87–91.PubMedCrossRef Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Chambers GK, Jagpal TJ, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The expectations of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:87–91.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hawker GA. Who, when and why total joint replacement surgery? The patient’s perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18:526–530.PubMedCrossRef Hawker GA. Who, when and why total joint replacement surgery? The patient’s perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18:526–530.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Iversen MD, Daltroy LH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;34:169–178.PubMedCrossRef Iversen MD, Daltroy LH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;34:169–178.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lieberman JR, Thomas BJ, Finerman GA, Dorey F. Patients’ reasons for undergoing total hip arthroplasty can change over time. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:63–68.PubMedCrossRef Lieberman JR, Thomas BJ, Finerman GA, Dorey F. Patients’ reasons for undergoing total hip arthroplasty can change over time. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:63–68.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID. Kinemax Outcomes Group. Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1201–1207.PubMedCrossRef Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID. Kinemax Outcomes Group. Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1201–1207.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lutz GK, Butzlaff ME, Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Singer DE, Deyo RA. The relation between expectations and outcome in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:740–744.PubMedCrossRef Lutz GK, Butzlaff ME, Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Singer DE, Deyo RA. The relation between expectations and outcome in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:740–744.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1273–1279.PubMed Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1273–1279.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mancuso CA, Altchek DW, Craig EV, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients’ expectations of shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:541–549.PubMedCrossRef Mancuso CA, Altchek DW, Craig EV, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients’ expectations of shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:541–549.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Does recollection error threaten the validity of cross-sectional studies of effectiveness? Med Care. 1995;33(4 suppl):AS77–AS88.PubMed Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Does recollection error threaten the validity of cross-sectional studies of effectiveness? Med Care. 1995;33(4 suppl):AS77–AS88.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:387–396.PubMedCrossRef Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:387–396.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Salvati EA. Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:872–878.PubMedCrossRef Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Salvati EA. Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:872–878.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1005–1012.PubMedCrossRef Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1005–1012.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Marcinkowski K, Wong VG, Dignam D. Getting back to the future: a grounded theory study of the patient perspective of total knee joint arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs. 2005;24:202–209.PubMedCrossRef Marcinkowski K, Wong VG, Dignam D. Getting back to the future: a grounded theory study of the patient perspective of total knee joint arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs. 2005;24:202–209.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference McGregor AH, Rylands H, Owen A, Doré CJ, Hughes SP. Does preoperative hip rehabilitation advice improve recovery and patient satisfaction? J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:464–468.PubMedCrossRef McGregor AH, Rylands H, Owen A, Doré CJ, Hughes SP. Does preoperative hip rehabilitation advice improve recovery and patient satisfaction? J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:464–468.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994;32:551–567.PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994;32:551–567.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. [Erratum in CMAJ. 2001;165:1303.] CMAJ. 2001;165:174–179. Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. [Erratum in CMAJ. 2001;165:1303.] CMAJ. 2001;165:174–179.
24.
go back to reference Moran M, Khan A, Sochart DH, Andrew G. Expect the best, prepare for the worst: surgeon and patient expectation of the outcome of primary total hip and knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85:204–206.PubMedCrossRef Moran M, Khan A, Sochart DH, Andrew G. Expect the best, prepare for the worst: surgeon and patient expectation of the outcome of primary total hip and knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85:204–206.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35–43.PubMedCrossRef Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35–43.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1985. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1985.
27.
go back to reference Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988;26:724–732.PubMedCrossRef Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988;26:724–732.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Uhlmann RF, Inui TS, Carter WB. Patient requests and expectations: definitions and clinical applications. Med Care. 1984;22:681–685.PubMedCrossRef Uhlmann RF, Inui TS, Carter WB. Patient requests and expectations: definitions and clinical applications. Med Care. 1984;22:681–685.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Venkataramanan V, Gignac MA, Mahomed NN, Davis AM. Expectations of recovery from revision knee replacement. Arthrit Care Res. 2006;55:314–321.CrossRef Venkataramanan V, Gignac MA, Mahomed NN, Davis AM. Expectations of recovery from revision knee replacement. Arthrit Care Res. 2006;55:314–321.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Randomized Trials to Modify Patients’ Preoperative Expectations of Hip and Knee Arthroplasties
Authors
Carol A. Mancuso, MD
Suzanne Graziano, RN
Lisa M. Briskie, RN
Margaret G. E. Peterson, PhD
Paul M. Pellicci, MD
Eduardo A. Salvati, MD
Thomas P. Sculco, MD
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0052-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2008 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

Acute Pyogenic Arthritis of the Hip: An Operation Giving Free Access and Effective Drainage

International Hip Society Symposium

The Etiology of Osteoarthritis of the Hip