Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2007

01-06-2007 | Original Paper

Models of Return to Work for Musculoskeletal Disorders

Authors: Izabela Z. Schultz, Anna W. Stowell, Michael Feuerstein, Robert J. Gatchel

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal pain disorders are the most prevalent, costly, disabling, and commonly researched conditions in the workplace, yet the development of overarching conceptual models of return to work (RTW) in these conditions has been lagging. Method: A critical review of the literature was performed using multiple medical and health search engines in order to provide an evaluation of the evolution and the state of the art of health and disability models with a focus on specific models of RTW. Results: The main tenets, implications for diagnosis, treatment, and disability compensation, are the key perspectives analyzed for the following specific models of RTW: biomedical, psychosocial, forensic, ecological/case management, biopsychosocial, and two more recent models developed by the Institute of Medicine and the World Health Organization, respectively. Conclusions: Future development of models that are truly transdisciplinary, and address temporal and multidimensional aspects of occupational disability, remains a goal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Labor. Lost-worktime injuries and illnesses: Characteristics and resulting time away from work, 1998, Publication USDL 00–115. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor; 2000. U.S. Department of Labor. Lost-worktime injuries and illnesses: Characteristics and resulting time away from work, 1998, Publication USDL 00–115. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor; 2000.
2.
go back to reference ICD9.chrisendres.com. 2006 ICD-9-CM: Medical Dictionary. 2006. Accessed 01/08/2007 [Available from: http://medical.webends.com/kw/musculoskeletal%20system] ICD9.chrisendres.com. 2006 ICD-9-CM: Medical Dictionary. 2006. Accessed 01/08/2007 [Available from: http://​medical.​webends.​com/​kw/​musculoskeletal%20system]
3.
go back to reference Noy D. Department of Classics – Masters degree in ancient philosophy and mythology ancient medicine: Myth and practice. 2002 [cited 2006 August 15]; Available from: http://www.lamp.ac.uk/∼noy/Medicine1.htm Noy D. Department of Classics – Masters degree in ancient philosophy and mythology ancient medicine: Myth and practice. 2002 [cited 2006 August 15]; Available from: http://​www.​lamp.​ac.​uk/​∼noy/​Medicine1.​htm
4.
go back to reference McKee B. Disability culture timeline: A brief history. 2003 [cited 2006 August 15]; Available from: http://www.chairgrrl.com/DisabilityTimeline/index.htm McKee B. Disability culture timeline: A brief history. 2003 [cited 2006 August 15]; Available from: http://​www.​chairgrrl.​com/​DisabilityTimeli​ne/​index.​htm
5.
6.
go back to reference Descartes R. Discourse on method and the meditations. Translated by John Veitch. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books; 1989. Descartes R. Discourse on method and the meditations. Translated by John Veitch. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books; 1989.
7.
go back to reference Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science 1965;50:971–9.CrossRef Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science 1965;50:971–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brody H. The systems view of man: Implications for medicine, science, and ethics. Perspect Biol Med 1973;17(1):71–92.PubMed Brody H. The systems view of man: Implications for medicine, science, and ethics. Perspect Biol Med 1973;17(1):71–92.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196(4286):129–36.PubMedCrossRef Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196(4286):129–36.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Melzack R. Pain and stress: A new perspective. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds). Psychosocial factors in pain: Critical perspectives. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.; 1999. Melzack R. Pain and stress: A new perspective. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds). Psychosocial factors in pain: Critical perspectives. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.; 1999.
11.
go back to reference Imrie R. Demystifying disability: A review of the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26(3):287–305.PubMedCrossRef Imrie R. Demystifying disability: A review of the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26(3):287–305.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):557–68.PubMedCrossRef Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):557–68.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med 2001;40(4):374–92.PubMedCrossRef Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med 2001;40(4):374–92.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan T, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return to work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:464–84.PubMedCrossRef Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan T, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return to work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:464–84.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(4):233–56.PubMedCrossRef Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(4):233–56.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Young A, Wasiak R, Roessler R, McPherson K, Anema J, van Poppel M. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):543–56.PubMedCrossRef Young A, Wasiak R, Roessler R, McPherson K, Anema J, van Poppel M. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):543–56.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stowell AW, McGeary DD. Musculoskeletal injury: A three-stage continuum from cause to disability to decision. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ (eds). Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk, identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 117–39.CrossRef Stowell AW, McGeary DD. Musculoskeletal injury: A three-stage continuum from cause to disability to decision. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ (eds). Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk, identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 117–39.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Linton S, Gross D, Schultz I, Main C, Cote P, Pransky G, Johnson W. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: Research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):469–74.CrossRef Linton S, Gross D, Schultz I, Main C, Cote P, Pransky G, Johnson W. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: Research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):469–74.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Baldwin ML, Johnson WG, Butler RJ. The error of using returns-to-work to measure the outcomes of health care. Am J Ind Med 1996;29(632–641). Baldwin ML, Johnson WG, Butler RJ. The error of using returns-to-work to measure the outcomes of health care. Am J Ind Med 1996;29(632–641).
20.
go back to reference Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: A critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(4):277–94.PubMedCrossRef Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: A critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(4):277–94.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schultz IZ, Crook JM, Berkowitz J, Meloche GR, Milner R, Zuberbier OA. Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability. Spine 2002;27(23):2720–5.PubMedCrossRef Schultz IZ, Crook JM, Berkowitz J, Meloche GR, Milner R, Zuberbier OA. Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability. Spine 2002;27(23):2720–5.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustun TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1173–87.PubMedCrossRef Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustun TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1173–87.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Olkin R, Pledger C. Can disability studies and psychology join hands? A new model of disability. Am Psychol 2003;58:296–304.PubMedCrossRef Olkin R, Pledger C. Can disability studies and psychology join hands? A new model of disability. Am Psychol 2003;58:296–304.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Abberley P. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disabil Handicap Soc 1987;2(1):5–19.CrossRef Abberley P. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disabil Handicap Soc 1987;2(1):5–19.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Meyerson L. The social psychology of the physical disability: 1948 and 1988. J Soc Issues 1988;44(1):173–88.CrossRef Meyerson L. The social psychology of the physical disability: 1948 and 1988. J Soc Issues 1988;44(1):173–88.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hughes B, Paterson K. The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disabil Handicap Soc 1997;12(3):325–40.CrossRef Hughes B, Paterson K. The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disabil Handicap Soc 1997;12(3):325–40.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fougeyrollas P, Bouregard L. Disability: An interactive person-environment social creation. Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage; 2001. Fougeyrollas P, Bouregard L. Disability: An interactive person-environment social creation. Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage; 2001.
30.
go back to reference Schultz IZ, Crook J, Fraser K, Joy PW. Models of diagnosis and rehabilitation in musculoskeletal pain-related occupational disability. J Occup Rehabil 2000;10(4):271–93.CrossRef Schultz IZ, Crook J, Fraser K, Joy PW. Models of diagnosis and rehabilitation in musculoskeletal pain-related occupational disability. J Occup Rehabil 2000;10(4):271–93.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Fine M, Asch A. Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. J Soc Issues 1988;44(1):3–21. Fine M, Asch A. Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. J Soc Issues 1988;44(1):3–21.
32.
go back to reference Leibowitz G. Organic and biophysical theories of behavior. J Dev Phys Disabil 1991;3:201–43.CrossRef Leibowitz G. Organic and biophysical theories of behavior. J Dev Phys Disabil 1991;3:201–43.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Turk DC. Biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds). Psychological approaches to pain management. New York: Guilford Press; 1996. p. 3–32. Turk DC. Biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds). Psychological approaches to pain management. New York: Guilford Press; 1996. p. 3–32.
34.
go back to reference Kelly M, Field D. Comments on the rejection of the biomedical model in sociological discourse. Med Sociol News 1994;19(3):34–7. Kelly M, Field D. Comments on the rejection of the biomedical model in sociological discourse. Med Sociol News 1994;19(3):34–7.
35.
go back to reference Hunt D, Zuberbier OA, Kozlowski A, Berkowitz J, Schultz IZ, Milner RA, Crook JM, Turk DC. Are components of a comprehensive medical assessment predictive of work disability following an episode of occupational low back trouble? Spine 2002;27(23):2715–9.PubMedCrossRef Hunt D, Zuberbier OA, Kozlowski A, Berkowitz J, Schultz IZ, Milner RA, Crook JM, Turk DC. Are components of a comprehensive medical assessment predictive of work disability following an episode of occupational low back trouble? Spine 2002;27(23):2715–9.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Robinson JP, Turk DC, Loeser JD. Pain, impairment, and disability in the AMA guidelines. J Law Med Ethics 2004;32(2):315–26.PubMedCrossRef Robinson JP, Turk DC, Loeser JD. Pain, impairment, and disability in the AMA guidelines. J Law Med Ethics 2004;32(2):315–26.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Cocchiarella L, Andersoon GBJ (eds). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 5th ed. Chicago, Illinois: AMA Press; 2001. Cocchiarella L, Andersoon GBJ (eds). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 5th ed. Chicago, Illinois: AMA Press; 2001.
38.
go back to reference Cocchiarella L, Turk MA, Andersson G. Improving the evaluation of permanent impairment. J Am Med Assoc 2000;283:532–3.CrossRef Cocchiarella L, Turk MA, Andersson G. Improving the evaluation of permanent impairment. J Am Med Assoc 2000;283:532–3.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Pransky G, Shaw WS, Franche R, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers: Current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(11):625–34.PubMedCrossRef Pransky G, Shaw WS, Franche R, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers: Current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(11):625–34.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Boorse C. Concepts of health. In: Van de Veer D, Regan T (eds.), Health care ethics: An introduction. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1987. p. 359–93. Boorse C. Concepts of health. In: Van de Veer D, Regan T (eds.), Health care ethics: An introduction. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1987. p. 359–93.
41.
go back to reference Polatin PB, Kinney RK, Gatchel RJ, Lillo E, Mayer TG. Psychiatric illness and chronic low-back pain. The mind and the spine – Which goes first? Spine 1993;18(1):66–71.PubMedCrossRef Polatin PB, Kinney RK, Gatchel RJ, Lillo E, Mayer TG. Psychiatric illness and chronic low-back pain. The mind and the spine – Which goes first? Spine 1993;18(1):66–71.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Lincoln AE, Miller VI, Wood PM. Case management services for work-related upper extremity disorders: Integrating workplace accommodation and problem-solving. AAOHN J 2001;49:378–89.PubMed Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Lincoln AE, Miller VI, Wood PM. Case management services for work-related upper extremity disorders: Integrating workplace accommodation and problem-solving. AAOHN J 2001;49:378–89.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Pergola T, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Brines J. Case management services for injured workers: Providers’ perspectives. AAOHN J 1999;47(9):397–404.PubMed Pergola T, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Brines J. Case management services for injured workers: Providers’ perspectives. AAOHN J 1999;47(9):397–404.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Salazar MK, Graham KY. Evaluation of a case management program. AAOHN J 1999;47(9):416–23.PubMed Salazar MK, Graham KY. Evaluation of a case management program. AAOHN J 1999;47(9):416–23.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Tsai JH, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Brines J. Case management for injured workers: A descriptive study using a record review. AAOHN J 1999;47(9):405–15.PubMed Tsai JH, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Brines J. Case management for injured workers: A descriptive study using a record review. AAOHN J 1999;47(9):405–15.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Brines J, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Pergola T. Return to work experience of injured workers in a case management program. AAOHN J 1999;47(8):365–72.PubMed Brines J, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Pergola T. Return to work experience of injured workers in a case management program. AAOHN J 1999;47(8):365–72.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Green-McKenzie J, Parkerson J, Bernacki E. Comparison of workers’ compensation costs for two cohorts of injured workers before and after the introduction of managed care. J Occup Environ Med 1998;40: 568–72.PubMedCrossRef Green-McKenzie J, Parkerson J, Bernacki E. Comparison of workers’ compensation costs for two cohorts of injured workers before and after the introduction of managed care. J Occup Environ Med 1998;40: 568–72.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Bernacki EJ, Tsai SP. Ten years’ experience using workers’ compensation case management system to control workers’ compensation costs. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45(5):508–19.PubMedCrossRef Bernacki EJ, Tsai SP. Ten years’ experience using workers’ compensation case management system to control workers’ compensation costs. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45(5):508–19.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. 61 U.S.L.W. 4805; 1993. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. 61 U.S.L.W. 4805; 1993.
50.
go back to reference Wikipedia. Daubert Standard. 2006 [cited 2006 August 13]; Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Daubert_Standard Wikipedia. Daubert Standard. 2006 [cited 2006 August 13]; Available from: http://​en.​wikipedia.​org/​ wiki/Daubert_Standard
51.
go back to reference Schultz IZ, Brady DO. Psychological injuries at trial: American Bar Association: Tort trial and insurance practice section; 2003. Schultz IZ, Brady DO. Psychological injuries at trial: American Bar Association: Tort trial and insurance practice section; 2003.
52.
go back to reference Hadjistavropoulos T, Bieling P. File review consultation in the adjudication of mental health and chronic pain disability claims. Consult Psychol J: Pract Res 2001;52(1):53–63. Hadjistavropoulos T, Bieling P. File review consultation in the adjudication of mental health and chronic pain disability claims. Consult Psychol J: Pract Res 2001;52(1):53–63.
53.
go back to reference Sherman JF, Ohrback R. Objective and subjective measurement of pain: Current approaches to forensic applications. In: Young G, Kane AW, Nicholson K (eds.), Psychological knowledge in court: PTSD, pain, and TBI. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 193–214.CrossRef Sherman JF, Ohrback R. Objective and subjective measurement of pain: Current approaches to forensic applications. In: Young G, Kane AW, Nicholson K (eds.), Psychological knowledge in court: PTSD, pain, and TBI. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 193–214.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Dersh J, Polatin PB, Leeman G, Gatchel RJ. The management of secondary gain and loss in medicolegal settings: Strengths and weaknesses. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14(4):267–79.PubMedCrossRef Dersh J, Polatin PB, Leeman G, Gatchel RJ. The management of secondary gain and loss in medicolegal settings: Strengths and weaknesses. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14(4):267–79.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Schultz IZ, Gatchel R (eds.). Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2005. Schultz IZ, Gatchel R (eds.). Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2005.
56.
go back to reference Baril R, Berthelette D. Les composantes et les déterminants organisationnels des interventions de maintien du lien d’emploi en enterprise. Montréal: Institut de recherche en santé et en sécurité du travail du Québec; 2000; Rapport No. R-238. Baril R, Berthelette D. Les composantes et les déterminants organisationnels des interventions de maintien du lien d’emploi en enterprise. Montréal: Institut de recherche en santé et en sécurité du travail du Québec; 2000; Rapport No. R-238.
57.
go back to reference Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, Meloche W. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: Towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain 2004;107:77–85.PubMedCrossRef Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, Meloche W. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: Towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain 2004;107:77–85.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, Koes B. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults (Review): The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2003. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, Koes B. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults (Review): The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2003.
59.
go back to reference Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191–215.PubMedCrossRef Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191–215.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Bandura A. The social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986. Bandura A. The social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
61.
go back to reference Sandstrom J, Esbjornsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation. The significance of the patient’s own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18:29–33.PubMed Sandstrom J, Esbjornsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation. The significance of the patient’s own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18:29–33.PubMed
62.
go back to reference Cole DC, Mondloch MV, Group EPM. Listening to workers: How recovery expectations predict outcomes. Can Med Assoc J 2002;166:749–54. Cole DC, Mondloch MV, Group EPM. Listening to workers: How recovery expectations predict outcomes. Can Med Assoc J 2002;166:749–54.
63.
go back to reference Turner J, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Wickizer T, Wu R, Gluck J, Egan K. Worker recovery expectations and fear-avoidance predict work disability in a population-based workers’ compensation back pain sample. Spine 2006;31(6):682–9.PubMedCrossRef Turner J, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Wickizer T, Wu R, Gluck J, Egan K. Worker recovery expectations and fear-avoidance predict work disability in a population-based workers’ compensation back pain sample. Spine 2006;31(6):682–9.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Burton AK, Tilloston KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine 1995;20:722–8.PubMedCrossRef Burton AK, Tilloston KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine 1995;20:722–8.PubMedCrossRef
65.
66.
go back to reference Turk DC, Gatchel RJ. Psychosocial assessment of chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders. In: Mayer TM, Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, (eds.), Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: Function, outcomes & evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 587–608. Turk DC, Gatchel RJ. Psychosocial assessment of chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders. In: Mayer TM, Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, (eds.), Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: Function, outcomes & evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 587–608.
67.
go back to reference Jensen M, Romano J, Turner J, Good A, Wald L. Patient beliefs predict patient functioning: Further support for a cognitive-behavioral model of chronic pain. Pain 1999;81:95–104.PubMedCrossRef Jensen M, Romano J, Turner J, Good A, Wald L. Patient beliefs predict patient functioning: Further support for a cognitive-behavioral model of chronic pain. Pain 1999;81:95–104.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Haldorsen E, Indahl A, Ursin H. Patients with low back pain not returning to work: A 12-month follow up study. Spine. 1998;23:1202–8.PubMedCrossRef Haldorsen E, Indahl A, Ursin H. Patients with low back pain not returning to work: A 12-month follow up study. Spine. 1998;23:1202–8.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Thebarge RW. Perceptions of disability and occupational stress as discriminators of work disability in patients with chronic pain. J Occup Rehabil 1991;1:185–95.CrossRef Feuerstein M, Thebarge RW. Perceptions of disability and occupational stress as discriminators of work disability in patients with chronic pain. J Occup Rehabil 1991;1:185–95.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Sullivan MJL, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):475–89.PubMedCrossRef Sullivan MJL, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):475–89.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Franche R, Baril R, Shaw WS, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: Optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):525–42.PubMedCrossRef Franche R, Baril R, Shaw WS, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: Optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):525–42.PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Loisel P, Durand M-J, Berthelette D, Vézina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, Larivière C, Tremblay C. Disability prevention: The new paradigm of management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 2001;9(7):351–60.CrossRef Loisel P, Durand M-J, Berthelette D, Vézina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, Larivière C, Tremblay C. Disability prevention: The new paradigm of management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 2001;9(7):351–60.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, Webster B. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):507–24.PubMedCrossRef Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, Webster B. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):507–24.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Steentra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, Bongers P, de Vet H, van Mechelen W. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2006;4:557–78.CrossRef Steentra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, Bongers P, de Vet H, van Mechelen W. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2006;4:557–78.CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
76.
go back to reference Friesen M, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return to work: The importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMed Friesen M, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return to work: The importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMed
77.
go back to reference Krause N, Ragland DR. Occupational disability due to low back pain: A new interdisciplinary classification used in a phase model of disability. Spine 1994;19:1011–20.PubMedCrossRef Krause N, Ragland DR. Occupational disability due to low back pain: A new interdisciplinary classification used in a phase model of disability. Spine 1994;19:1011–20.PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Shrey D, Lacerte M. Principles and practices of disability management in industry. Winter Park, FL: GR Press; 1995. Shrey D, Lacerte M. Principles and practices of disability management in industry. Winter Park, FL: GR Press; 1995.
79.
go back to reference Amick BI, Habeck R, Hunt A, Fossel A, Chapin A, Keller R, Katz J. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil 2000;10(1):21–38.CrossRef Amick BI, Habeck R, Hunt A, Fossel A, Chapin A, Keller R, Katz J. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil 2000;10(1):21–38.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Bruyère S, Shrey D. Disability management in industry: A joint labor-management process. Rehabil Couns Bull 1991;34(3):227–42. Bruyère S, Shrey D. Disability management in industry: A joint labor-management process. Rehabil Couns Bull 1991;34(3):227–42.
81.
go back to reference Shrey D. Workplace disability management in industrial rehabilitation: An overview. In: Lacerte DESM, (ed.), Principles and practices of disability management in industry. Winter Park, FL: PMD Publishers Group; 1995. Shrey D. Workplace disability management in industrial rehabilitation: An overview. In: Lacerte DESM, (ed.), Principles and practices of disability management in industry. Winter Park, FL: PMD Publishers Group; 1995.
82.
go back to reference Hunt A, Habeck R. The Michigan Disability Prevention study: Research highlights. Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper 93–18; 1993. May 4, 2006 [cited; Available from: http://www.pjohninst.org/ publications/wp/93–18.pdf] Hunt A, Habeck R. The Michigan Disability Prevention study: Research highlights. Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper 93–18; 1993. May 4, 2006 [cited; Available from: http://​www.​pjohninst.​org/​ publications/wp/93–18.pdf]
83.
go back to reference Hunt H, Habeck R, VanTol B, Scully S. Disability prevention among Michigan employers (Upjohn Institute technical report no. 93–004). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 1993. Hunt H, Habeck R, VanTol B, Scully S. Disability prevention among Michigan employers (Upjohn Institute technical report no. 93–004). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 1993.
84.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Shaw W, Lincoln A, Miller V, Wood P. Clinical and workplace factors associated with a return to modified duty in work-related upper extremity disorders. Pain 2003;102(1–2):51–61.PubMedCrossRef Feuerstein M, Shaw W, Lincoln A, Miller V, Wood P. Clinical and workplace factors associated with a return to modified duty in work-related upper extremity disorders. Pain 2003;102(1–2):51–61.PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Lincoln AE, Feuerstein M, Shaw WS, Miller VI. Impact of case manager training on worksite accommodations in workers’ compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44(3):237–45.PubMedCrossRef Lincoln AE, Feuerstein M, Shaw WS, Miller VI. Impact of case manager training on worksite accommodations in workers’ compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44(3):237–45.PubMedCrossRef
86.
go back to reference Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Lincoln A, Miller V, Wood P. Case management services for work related upper extremity disorders: Integrating workplace accommodation and problem solving. AAOHN J 2001;49(8):378–89.PubMed Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Lincoln A, Miller V, Wood P. Case management services for work related upper extremity disorders: Integrating workplace accommodation and problem solving. AAOHN J 2001;49(8):378–89.PubMed
87.
go back to reference Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Baldwin ML. Managing work disability: Why first return to work is not a measure of success. Ind Labor Relat Rev 1995;48(3):452–69.CrossRef Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Baldwin ML. Managing work disability: Why first return to work is not a measure of success. Ind Labor Relat Rev 1995;48(3):452–69.CrossRef
88.
go back to reference Baldwin ML, Johnson WG. Labor market discrimination against women with disabilities. Ind Relat 1995;34(4):555–77.CrossRef Baldwin ML, Johnson WG. Labor market discrimination against women with disabilities. Ind Relat 1995;34(4):555–77.CrossRef
89.
go back to reference Chirikos T, Nestel G. Economic determinants and consequences of self-reported work disability. J Health Econ 1984;3(2):117–36.PubMedCrossRef Chirikos T, Nestel G. Economic determinants and consequences of self-reported work disability. J Health Econ 1984;3(2):117–36.PubMedCrossRef
90.
go back to reference Johnson WG, Baldwin ML. The Americans with Disabilities Act: Will it make a difference? Policy Stud J 1993;21(4):775–88.CrossRef Johnson WG, Baldwin ML. The Americans with Disabilities Act: Will it make a difference? Policy Stud J 1993;21(4):775–88.CrossRef
91.
go back to reference Hergenrather KC, Rhodes SD, McDaniel S, Brown CD. Job placement: The development of theory-based measures. J Rehabil 2003;69(4):27–34. Hergenrather KC, Rhodes SD, McDaniel S, Brown CD. Job placement: The development of theory-based measures. J Rehabil 2003;69(4):27–34.
92.
go back to reference Wunderlich G, Rice D, Amado N. Dynamics of disability: Measuring and monitoring disability for social security programs. Washington D.C.: The National Academy Press; 2002. Wunderlich G, Rice D, Amado N. Dynamics of disability: Measuring and monitoring disability for social security programs. Washington D.C.: The National Academy Press; 2002.
93.
go back to reference Panel on Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace-Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education-National Research Council (NRC) and Institute of Medicine (IOM). Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: Low back and upper extremities. Chapter II – Interventions in the workplace, p. 301–329. 2001. Accessed August 8, 2006 [Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10032.html#orgs] Panel on Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace-Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education-National Research Council (NRC) and Institute of Medicine (IOM). Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: Low back and upper extremities. Chapter II – Interventions in the workplace, p. 301–329. 2001. Accessed August 8, 2006 [Available from: http://​www.​nap.​edu/​catalog/​10032.​html#orgs]
94.
go back to reference Bongers PM, de Winter CR, Kompier MAJ, Hildebrandt VH. Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993;19:297–321.PubMed Bongers PM, de Winter CR, Kompier MAJ, Hildebrandt VH. Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993;19:297–321.PubMed
95.
go back to reference Gatchel RJ, Polatin P, Mayer T. The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability. Spine 1995;20(24):2702–9.PubMedCrossRef Gatchel RJ, Polatin P, Mayer T. The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability. Spine 1995;20(24):2702–9.PubMedCrossRef
96.
go back to reference Hoogendoorn W, Bongers P, de Vet H, Houtman I, Ariens G, van Mechelen W, Bouter L. Psychosocial work characteristics and psychological strain in relation to low-back pain. Scand J Work, Environ Health 2001;27(4):258–67. Hoogendoorn W, Bongers P, de Vet H, Houtman I, Ariens G, van Mechelen W, Bouter L. Psychosocial work characteristics and psychological strain in relation to low-back pain. Scand J Work, Environ Health 2001;27(4):258–67.
97.
go back to reference Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988.
98.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Callan-Harris S, Hickey P, Dyer D, Armbruster W, Carosella A. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremity disorders. J Occup Med 1993;35:396–403.PubMed Feuerstein M, Callan-Harris S, Hickey P, Dyer D, Armbruster W, Carosella A. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremity disorders. J Occup Med 1993;35:396–403.PubMed
99.
go back to reference Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehabil 1991;1(1):5–12.CrossRef Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehabil 1991;1(1):5–12.CrossRef
100.
go back to reference Frank JW, Kerr MS, Brooker A-S, DeMaio SE, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part I. What do we know about primary prevention? A Review of the scientific evidence on prevention before disability begins. Spine 1996;21(24):2908–17.PubMedCrossRef Frank JW, Kerr MS, Brooker A-S, DeMaio SE, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part I. What do we know about primary prevention? A Review of the scientific evidence on prevention before disability begins. Spine 1996;21(24):2908–17.PubMedCrossRef
101.
go back to reference Frank JW, Brooker A-S, DeMaio SE, Kerr MS, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: What do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine 1996;21(24):2918–29.PubMedCrossRef Frank JW, Brooker A-S, DeMaio SE, Kerr MS, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: What do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine 1996;21(24):2918–29.PubMedCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, Beaton D, Cole D. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain: New evidence gives new hope – if we can just get all the players on the same side. Can Med Assoc J 1998;158(12):1625–31. Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, Beaton D, Cole D. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain: New evidence gives new hope – if we can just get all the players on the same side. Can Med Assoc J 1998;158(12):1625–31.
103.
go back to reference Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Kinney RK. Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: A prospective analysis. Health Psychol 1995;14(5):415–20.PubMedCrossRef Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Kinney RK. Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: A prospective analysis. Health Psychol 1995;14(5):415–20.PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference Pengel L, Herbert R, Maher C, Refshauge K. Acute low back pain: Systematic review of its prognosis. Br Med J 2003;327(1–5):323–8.CrossRef Pengel L, Herbert R, Maher C, Refshauge K. Acute low back pain: Systematic review of its prognosis. Br Med J 2003;327(1–5):323–8.CrossRef
105.
go back to reference Turner JA, Franklin G, Turk D. Predictors of chronic disability in injured workers: A systematic literature synthesis. Am J Ind Med. 2000;38(707–722). Turner JA, Franklin G, Turk D. Predictors of chronic disability in injured workers: A systematic literature synthesis. Am J Ind Med. 2000;38(707–722).
106.
go back to reference Franklin G, Turner J, Fulton-Kehoe D, Wickizer T, Egan K, Rae W. Predictors of long-term disability among workers with musculoskeletal disorders. 2006 [cited 2006 August 13]; Available from: http://depts.washington.edu/occepi/projects/predictorsLongTermDis.html Franklin G, Turner J, Fulton-Kehoe D, Wickizer T, Egan K, Rae W. Predictors of long-term disability among workers with musculoskeletal disorders. 2006 [cited 2006 August 13]; Available from: http://​depts.​washington.​edu/​occepi/​projects/​predictorsLongTe​rmDis.​html
107.
go back to reference Main CJ, Spanswick CC. Pain Management: An interdisciplinary approach. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone; 2000. Main CJ, Spanswick CC. Pain Management: An interdisciplinary approach. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone; 2000.
108.
go back to reference Turk DC, Monarch ES. Biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain. In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ (eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner’s handbook. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2002. Turk DC, Monarch ES. Biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain. In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ (eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner’s handbook. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2002.
109.
go back to reference Gatchel RJ. Psychological disorders and chronic pain: Cause and effect relationships. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner’s handbook. New York: Guilford; 1996. p. 33–52. Gatchel RJ. Psychological disorders and chronic pain: Cause and effect relationships. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner’s handbook. New York: Guilford; 1996. p. 33–52.
110.
go back to reference Jones M, Edwards I, Gifford L. Conceptual models for implementing biopsychosocial theory in clinical practice. Manual Ther 2002;7(1):2–9.CrossRef Jones M, Edwards I, Gifford L. Conceptual models for implementing biopsychosocial theory in clinical practice. Manual Ther 2002;7(1):2–9.CrossRef
111.
go back to reference Dersh J, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N. The role of tertiary gain in pain disability. Practical Pain Management. 2005;Sept/Oct:13–28. Dersh J, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N. The role of tertiary gain in pain disability. Practical Pain Management. 2005;Sept/Oct:13–28.
112.
go back to reference Morris DB. Illness and culture in the postmodern age. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California; 1998. Morris DB. Illness and culture in the postmodern age. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California; 1998.
113.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Zastowny T. Occupational rehabilitation: Multidisciplinary management of work-related musculoskeletal pain and disability. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner’s handbook. New York: Guilford Press, xvi; 1996. p. 458–85. Feuerstein M, Zastowny T. Occupational rehabilitation: Multidisciplinary management of work-related musculoskeletal pain and disability. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner’s handbook. New York: Guilford Press, xvi; 1996. p. 458–85.
114.
go back to reference Schulman M. Worklessness and disability: Expansion of the biopsychosocial perspective. J Occup Rehabil 1994;4(2):113–22.CrossRef Schulman M. Worklessness and disability: Expansion of the biopsychosocial perspective. J Occup Rehabil 1994;4(2):113–22.CrossRef
115.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Berkowitz J, Haufler A, Lopez M, Huang G. Work with low back pain: Workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:627–38.PubMedCrossRef Feuerstein M, Berkowitz J, Haufler A, Lopez M, Huang G. Work with low back pain: Workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:627–38.PubMedCrossRef
116.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Berkowitz S, Huang G. Predictors of occupational low back disability: Implications for secondary prevention. J Occup Environ Med 1999;41:1024–31.PubMedCrossRef Feuerstein M, Berkowitz S, Huang G. Predictors of occupational low back disability: Implications for secondary prevention. J Occup Environ Med 1999;41:1024–31.PubMedCrossRef
117.
go back to reference Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Lincoln AE, Miller VI, Wood PM. Ergonomic and psychosocial factors affecting daily function in workers’ compensation claimants with persistent upper-extremity disorders. J OccupEnviron Med 2002;44(7):606–15.CrossRef Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Lincoln AE, Miller VI, Wood PM. Ergonomic and psychosocial factors affecting daily function in workers’ compensation claimants with persistent upper-extremity disorders. J OccupEnviron Med 2002;44(7):606–15.CrossRef
118.
go back to reference Hagen K, Thune O. Work incapacity from low back pain in the general population [Epidemiology]. Spine 1998;23(19):2091–5.PubMedCrossRef Hagen K, Thune O. Work incapacity from low back pain in the general population [Epidemiology]. Spine 1998;23(19):2091–5.PubMedCrossRef
119.
go back to reference Williams DA, Feuerstein M, Durbin D, Pezzullo J. Costs across the natural history of disability in occupational low back pain. Spine 1998;23(21):2329–36.PubMedCrossRef Williams DA, Feuerstein M, Durbin D, Pezzullo J. Costs across the natural history of disability in occupational low back pain. Spine 1998;23(21):2329–36.PubMedCrossRef
120.
go back to reference Franche R, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness. In: Schultz I, Gatchel R (eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 67–92.CrossRef Franche R, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness. In: Schultz I, Gatchel R (eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 67–92.CrossRef
121.
go back to reference Dasinger LK, Krause N, Thompson PJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Doctor proactive communication, return to work recommendation, and duration of disability after a workers’ compensation low back injury. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43(6):515–25.PubMedCrossRef Dasinger LK, Krause N, Thompson PJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Doctor proactive communication, return to work recommendation, and duration of disability after a workers’ compensation low back injury. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43(6):515–25.PubMedCrossRef
122.
go back to reference McIntosh G, Frank J, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Prognostic factors for time receiving workers’ compensation benefits in a cohort of patients with low back pain. Spine 2000;25(2):147–57.PubMedCrossRef McIntosh G, Frank J, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Prognostic factors for time receiving workers’ compensation benefits in a cohort of patients with low back pain. Spine 2000;25(2):147–57.PubMedCrossRef
123.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:390–5.PubMedCrossRef Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:390–5.PubMedCrossRef
124.
go back to reference Johnson WG, Baldwin ML, Butler RJ. Back pain and work disability: The need for a new paradigm. Ind Relat 1998;37(1):9–34.CrossRef Johnson WG, Baldwin ML, Butler RJ. Back pain and work disability: The need for a new paradigm. Ind Relat 1998;37(1):9–34.CrossRef
125.
go back to reference Pransky G, Benjamin K, Hill-Fotouhi C, Fletcher KE, Himmelstein J, Katy JN. Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain: A multidimensional analysis. Spine 2002;27:864–70.PubMedCrossRef Pransky G, Benjamin K, Hill-Fotouhi C, Fletcher KE, Himmelstein J, Katy JN. Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain: A multidimensional analysis. Spine 2002;27:864–70.PubMedCrossRef
126.
go back to reference Wasiak R, Pransky G, Verma S, Webster B. Recurrence of low back pain: Definition-sensitivity analysis using administrative data. Spine 2003;28:2283–91.PubMedCrossRef Wasiak R, Pransky G, Verma S, Webster B. Recurrence of low back pain: Definition-sensitivity analysis using administrative data. Spine 2003;28:2283–91.PubMedCrossRef
127.
go back to reference Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002;82(11):1098–107.PubMed Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002;82(11):1098–107.PubMed
128.
go back to reference World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): ICF full report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): ICF full report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
129.
go back to reference Dahl T. International classification of functioning, disability and health: An introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:201–4.PubMedCrossRef Dahl T. International classification of functioning, disability and health: An introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:201–4.PubMedCrossRef
130.
go back to reference van der Ploeg HP, van der Beek AJ, van der Woude LH, van Mechelen W. Physical activity for people with a disability: A conceptual model. Sports Med 2004;34(10):639–49.PubMedCrossRef van der Ploeg HP, van der Beek AJ, van der Woude LH, van Mechelen W. Physical activity for people with a disability: A conceptual model. Sports Med 2004;34(10):639–49.PubMedCrossRef
131.
go back to reference Panel on Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace-Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education-National Research Council (NRC) and Institute of Medicine (IOM). Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: Low back and upper extremities. Executive Summary, p 3, figure. ES.1. 2001. Accessed October 12, 2006 [Available from: http://newton.nap.edu/books/0309072840/html/3.html] Panel on Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace-Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education-National Research Council (NRC) and Institute of Medicine (IOM). Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: Low back and upper extremities. Executive Summary, p 3, figure. ES.1. 2001. Accessed October 12, 2006 [Available from: http://​newton.​nap.​edu/​books/​0309072840/​html/​3.​html]
Metadata
Title
Models of Return to Work for Musculoskeletal Disorders
Authors
Izabela Z. Schultz
Anna W. Stowell
Michael Feuerstein
Robert J. Gatchel
Publication date
01-06-2007
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9071-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2007 Go to the issue