Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2022

04-02-2022 | Antibiotic | Original Article

Impact of Prior Drug Allergies on the Risk, Clinical Features, and Outcomes of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Adults

Authors: Amoah Yeboah-Korang, Ahmed Memon, Neil Patel, Andrea Portocarrero-Castillo, Askanda Osman, David Kleesattel, Carmen Lopez, Jeremy Louissaint, Kenneth Sherman, Robert Fontana

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 11/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prior drug allergies are common and may increase susceptibility to adverse medication effects. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency, clinical features, and outcomes of DILI among patients with and without a history of prior drug allergy.

Methods

The EMR at a large liver referral center was searched for all DILI encounters using ICD-10 T-codes for drug poisoning/toxicity and K-71 codes for toxic liver injury between 10/1/2015 and 9/30/2019. Clinically significant liver injury was identified using predefined laboratory criteria, and cases were adjudicated using a 5-point expert opinion scale: 1/2/3 = probable DILI and 4/5 = non-DILI. Drug allergy was defined as a history of anaphylaxis, hives, rash, or pruritus after drug exposure.

Results

Among 766,930 patient encounters, 127 unique patients met inclusion criteria with 72 (56.7%) cases adjudicated as probable DILI and 55 (43.3%) as non-DILI. In the probable DILI group, the most frequent suspect drug classes were: antimicrobials (41.9%), herbal and dietary supplements (9.5%), and antineoplastics (8.1%). Twenty-three of the 72 DILI patients (31.9%) had a history of drug allergy before the DILI episode compared to 16 (29.1%) of the 55 non-DILI cases (p = 0.89). However, none of the allergy drugs and suspect DILI drugs were the same although many were in the same drug class. DILI patients with a prior drug allergy were more likely to be female (73.9% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.04) and have lower serum bilirubin (4.0 vs. 7.8, p = 0.08) and INR (1.1 vs. 1.6, p = 0.043) levels at presentation. The likelihood of death or liver transplantation among probable DILI cases with prior drug allergy was lower than those without prior drug allergy (0% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.35). The suspect drug was subsequently documented in the “Drug Allergy” section of the EMR in only 23 (31.9%) of the 72 probable DILI patients, and these patients were more likely to present with a rash (7% vs. 2%, p = 0.006) and higher serum bilirubin levels (10.5 vs. 4.7, p = 0.008) compared to those in whom the suspect drug was not listed as “drug allergy.”

Conclusion

A prior drug allergy history was not associated with a greater likelihood of developing DILI compared to other causes of acute liver injury. However, the probable DILI patients with a history of prior drug allergy tended to have less severe liver injury and clinical outcomes. The low rate of suspect drug documentation in the “Drug Allergy” section of EMR after a DILI episode is of concern and could lead to avoidable harm from inadvertent suspect drug re-challenge.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Khan DA, Solensky R. Drug allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:S126-137.CrossRef Khan DA, Solensky R. Drug allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:S126-137.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–1205.CrossRef Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–1205.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556–1564.CrossRef Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556–1564.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Howard RL, Avery AJ, Slavenburg S et al. Which drugs cause preventable admissions to hospital? A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:136–147.CrossRef Howard RL, Avery AJ, Slavenburg S et al. Which drugs cause preventable admissions to hospital? A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:136–147.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference White TJ, Arakelian A, Rho JP. Counting the costs of drug-related adverse events. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:445–458.CrossRef White TJ, Arakelian A, Rho JP. Counting the costs of drug-related adverse events. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:445–458.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS et al. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1997;277:301–306.CrossRef Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS et al. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1997;277:301–306.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hadi MA, Neoh CF, Zin RM et al. Pharmacovigilance: pharmacists’ perspective on spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017;6:91–98.CrossRef Hadi MA, Neoh CF, Zin RM et al. Pharmacovigilance: pharmacists’ perspective on spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017;6:91–98.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Aagaard L, Strandell J, Melsken L et al. Global patterns of adverse drug reactions over a decade. Drug Saf. 2012;35:1171–1182.CrossRef Aagaard L, Strandell J, Melsken L et al. Global patterns of adverse drug reactions over a decade. Drug Saf. 2012;35:1171–1182.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Coxon J, Rees J. Avoiding medical errors in general practice. Trends Urol Men’s Health. 2015;6:13–17.CrossRef Coxon J, Rees J. Avoiding medical errors in general practice. Trends Urol Men’s Health. 2015;6:13–17.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Avery AJ, Ghaleb M, Barber N et al. The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63:e543–e553.CrossRef Avery AJ, Ghaleb M, Barber N et al. The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63:e543–e553.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Galbraith A, Bullock S, Manias E et al. Fundamentals of pharmacology: an applied approach for nursing and health. London: Routledge; 2015.CrossRef Galbraith A, Bullock S, Manias E et al. Fundamentals of pharmacology: an applied approach for nursing and health. London: Routledge; 2015.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vervloet D, Durham S. Adverse reactions to drugs. BMJ. 1998;316:1511–1514.CrossRef Vervloet D, Durham S. Adverse reactions to drugs. BMJ. 1998;316:1511–1514.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mirakian R, Ewan PW, Durham SR et al. BSACI guidelines for the management of drug allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2009;39:43–61.CrossRef Mirakian R, Ewan PW, Durham SR et al. BSACI guidelines for the management of drug allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2009;39:43–61.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Björnsson ES, Bergmann OM, Björnsson HK et al. Incidence, presentation, and outcomes in patients with drug-induced liver injury in the general population of Iceland. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1419–1425.CrossRef Björnsson ES, Bergmann OM, Björnsson HK et al. Incidence, presentation, and outcomes in patients with drug-induced liver injury in the general population of Iceland. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1419–1425.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nicoletti P, Aithal GP, Bjornsson ES et al. Association of liver injury from specific drugs, or groups of drugs, with polymorphisms in HLA and other genes in a genome-wide association study. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1078–1089.CrossRef Nicoletti P, Aithal GP, Bjornsson ES et al. Association of liver injury from specific drugs, or groups of drugs, with polymorphisms in HLA and other genes in a genome-wide association study. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1078–1089.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kenna JG. Immunoallergic drug-induced hepatitis: lessons from halothane. J Hepatol. 1997;26:5–12.CrossRef Kenna JG. Immunoallergic drug-induced hepatitis: lessons from halothane. J Hepatol. 1997;26:5–12.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Crespo Pérez L, Moreira Vicente V, Cano Ruiz A et al. Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome: an entity to be remembered. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;32:687–692.CrossRef Crespo Pérez L, Moreira Vicente V, Cano Ruiz A et al. Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome: an entity to be remembered. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;32:687–692.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Knowles SR, Shapiro LE, Shear NH. Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf. 1999;21:489–501.CrossRef Knowles SR, Shapiro LE, Shear NH. Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf. 1999;21:489–501.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pichler WJ, Srinoulprasert Y, Yun J, Hausmann O. Multiple drug hypersensitivity. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172:129–138.CrossRef Pichler WJ, Srinoulprasert Y, Yun J, Hausmann O. Multiple drug hypersensitivity. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172:129–138.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fontana RJ, Watkins PB, Bonkovsky HL et al. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct. Drug Saf. 2009;32:55–68.CrossRef Fontana RJ, Watkins PB, Bonkovsky HL et al. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct. Drug Saf. 2009;32:55–68.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pawankar R, Canonica GW, ST Holgate ST, et al. The WAO White Book on Allergy (Update. 2013); World Allergy Organization 2013, pp. 57–61. (Accessed in January 2022) Pawankar R, Canonica GW, ST Holgate ST, et al. The WAO White Book on Allergy (Update. 2013); World Allergy Organization 2013, pp. 57–61. (Accessed in January 2022)
22.
go back to reference Stausberg J. International prevalence of adverse drug events in hospitals: an analysis of routine data from England, Germany, and the USA. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:1–9.CrossRef Stausberg J. International prevalence of adverse drug events in hospitals: an analysis of routine data from England, Germany, and the USA. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:1–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL, Fontana R et al. Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug-induced liver injury: the DILIN prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1340–1352.CrossRef Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL, Fontana R et al. Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug-induced liver injury: the DILIN prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1340–1352.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Macy E, Ho NJ. Multiple drug intolerance syndrome: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108:88–93.CrossRef Macy E, Ho NJ. Multiple drug intolerance syndrome: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108:88–93.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Salo PM, Arbes SJ, Jaramillo R et al. Prevalence of allergic sensitization in the U.S.: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:350–359.CrossRef Salo PM, Arbes SJ, Jaramillo R et al. Prevalence of allergic sensitization in the U.S.: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:350–359.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yung JA, Fuseini H, Newcomb DC. Hormones, sex, and asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120:488–494.CrossRef Yung JA, Fuseini H, Newcomb DC. Hormones, sex, and asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120:488–494.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Norton AE, Broyles AD. Drug allergy in children and adults. Is it the double X chromosome? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;122:148–155.CrossRef Norton AE, Broyles AD. Drug allergy in children and adults. Is it the double X chromosome? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;122:148–155.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tillman EM, Suppes SL, Feldman K, Goldman JL. Enhancing pediatric adverse drug reaction documentation in the electronic medical record. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;61:181–186.CrossRef Tillman EM, Suppes SL, Feldman K, Goldman JL. Enhancing pediatric adverse drug reaction documentation in the electronic medical record. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;61:181–186.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kiechle ES, McKenna CM, Carter H et al. Medication allergy and adverse drug reaction documentation discrepancies in an urban, academic emergency department. J Med Toxicol. 2018;14:272–277.CrossRef Kiechle ES, McKenna CM, Carter H et al. Medication allergy and adverse drug reaction documentation discrepancies in an urban, academic emergency department. J Med Toxicol. 2018;14:272–277.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Warrington R, Silviu-Dan F. Drug allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2011;7:S10.CrossRef Warrington R, Silviu-Dan F. Drug allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2011;7:S10.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Andrade RJ, Robles M, Lucena MI. Rechallenge in drug-induced liver injury: the attractive hazard. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2009;8:709–714.CrossRef Andrade RJ, Robles M, Lucena MI. Rechallenge in drug-induced liver injury: the attractive hazard. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2009;8:709–714.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Chalasani NP, Hayashi PH, Bonkovsky HL et al. ACG clinical guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:950–966.CrossRef Chalasani NP, Hayashi PH, Bonkovsky HL et al. ACG clinical guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:950–966.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Hunt CM, Papay JI, Stanulovic V, Regev A. Drug rechallenge following drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology. 2017;66:646–654.CrossRef Hunt CM, Papay JI, Stanulovic V, Regev A. Drug rechallenge following drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology. 2017;66:646–654.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J et al. Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process; comparison of the RUCAM method. Hepatology. 2010;51:2117–2226.CrossRef Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J et al. Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process; comparison of the RUCAM method. Hepatology. 2010;51:2117–2226.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of Prior Drug Allergies on the Risk, Clinical Features, and Outcomes of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Adults
Authors
Amoah Yeboah-Korang
Ahmed Memon
Neil Patel
Andrea Portocarrero-Castillo
Askanda Osman
David Kleesattel
Carmen Lopez
Jeremy Louissaint
Kenneth Sherman
Robert Fontana
Publication date
04-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07403-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2022 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.