Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014

01-10-2014 | Clinical trial

A pilot study utilizing multi-omic molecular profiling to find potential targets and select individualized treatments for patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer

Authors: Gayle S. Jameson, Emanuel F. Petricoin, Jasgit Sachdev, Lance A. Liotta, David M. Loesch, Stephen P. Anthony, Manpreet K. Chadha, Julia D. Wulfkuhle, Rosa I. Gallagher, Kimberley A. Reeder, Mariaelena Pierobon, Monica R. Fulk, Nina A. Cantafio, Bryant Dunetz, William D. Mikrut, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Nicholas J. Robert

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The primary objective was to determine if multi-omic molecular profiling (MMP) informed selection of approved cancer treatments could change the clinical course of disease for patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (i.e., produce a growth modulation index (GMI) ≥1.3). GMI was calculated as the ratio of progression free survival on MMP-selected therapy/time to progression on last prior treatment. To meet the primary objective at least 35 % of the subjects should demonstrate a GMI ≥1.3. Secondary endpoints included determining the response rate (according to RECIST 1.1), the percent of patients with non-progression at 4 months, and overall survival in patients whose therapy is selected by molecular profiling and proteomic analysis. Eligible patients had MBC, with ≥3 prior lines of therapy. A multi-omic based approach was performed incorporating multiplexed immunohistochemistry, c-DNA microarray, and phosphoprotein pathway activation mapping by reverse phase protein array. MMP was performed on fresh core biopsies; results were generated and sent to a Treatment Selection Committee (TSC) for review and treatment selection. Three sites enrolled 28 patients, of which 25 were evaluable. The median range of prior treatment was 7 (range 3–12). The MMP analysis and treatment recommendation were delivered within a median of 15.5 days from biopsy (range 12–23). The TSC selected MMP-rationalized treatment in 100 % (25/25) of cases. None of the MMP-based therapies were the same as what the clinician would have selected if the MMP had not been performed. GMI ≥1.3 was reported in 11/25 (44 %) patients. Partial responses were noted in 5/25 (20 %), stable disease in 8/25 (32 %) and 9/25 (36 %) had no progression at 4 months. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of finding possible treatments for patients with previously treated MBC using a multiplexed MMP-rationalized treatment recommendation. This MMP approach merits further investigation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Armstrong DK (2002) Relapsed ovarian cancer: challenges and management strategies for a chronic disease. Oncologist 7(Suppl 5):20–28PubMedCrossRef Armstrong DK (2002) Relapsed ovarian cancer: challenges and management strategies for a chronic disease. Oncologist 7(Suppl 5):20–28PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bailey CH, Jameson G, Sima C, Fleck S, White E, Von Hoff DD, Weiss GJ (2012) Progression-free survival decreases with each subsequent therapy in patients presenting for phase I clinical trials. J Cancer 3:7–13PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Bailey CH, Jameson G, Sima C, Fleck S, White E, Von Hoff DD, Weiss GJ (2012) Progression-free survival decreases with each subsequent therapy in patients presenting for phase I clinical trials. J Cancer 3:7–13PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Von Hoff DD, Stephenson JJ Jr, Rosen P, Loesch DM et al (2010) Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients’ tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. J Clin Oncol 28(33):4877–4883. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.5983 CrossRef Von Hoff DD, Stephenson JJ Jr, Rosen P, Loesch DM et al (2010) Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients’ tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. J Clin Oncol 28(33):4877–4883. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2009.​26.​5983 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jegg AM, Ward TM, Iorns E, Hoe N, Zhou J, Liu X, Singh S, Landgraf R, Pegram MD (2012) PI3K independent activation of mTORC1 as a target in lapatinib-resistant ERBB2+ breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136(3):683–692. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2252-9 PubMedCrossRef Jegg AM, Ward TM, Iorns E, Hoe N, Zhou J, Liu X, Singh S, Landgraf R, Pegram MD (2012) PI3K independent activation of mTORC1 as a target in lapatinib-resistant ERBB2+ breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136(3):683–692. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-012-2252-9 PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Wulfkuhle JD, Berg D, Wolff C, Langer R, Tran K, Illi J, Espina V, Pierobon M et al (2012) Molecular analysis of HER2 signaling in human breast cancer by functional protein pathway activation mapping. Clin Cancer Res 18(23):6426–6435. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0452 PubMedCrossRef Wulfkuhle JD, Berg D, Wolff C, Langer R, Tran K, Illi J, Espina V, Pierobon M et al (2012) Molecular analysis of HER2 signaling in human breast cancer by functional protein pathway activation mapping. Clin Cancer Res 18(23):6426–6435. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-12-0452 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wulfkuhle JD, Speer R, Pierobon M, Laird J, Espina V, Deng J et al (2008) Multiplexed cell signaling analysis of human breast cancer applications for personalized therapy. J Proteome Res 7(4):1508–1517. doi:10.1021/pr7008127 PubMedCrossRef Wulfkuhle JD, Speer R, Pierobon M, Laird J, Espina V, Deng J et al (2008) Multiplexed cell signaling analysis of human breast cancer applications for personalized therapy. J Proteome Res 7(4):1508–1517. doi:10.​1021/​pr7008127 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Petricoin EF 3rd, Bichsel VE, Calvert VS, Espina V, Winters M et al (2005) Mapping molecular networks using proteomics: a vision for patient-tailored combination therapy. J Clin Oncol 23(15):3614–3621PubMedCrossRef Petricoin EF 3rd, Bichsel VE, Calvert VS, Espina V, Winters M et al (2005) Mapping molecular networks using proteomics: a vision for patient-tailored combination therapy. J Clin Oncol 23(15):3614–3621PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Silvestri A, Calvert V, Belluco C, Lipsky M, De Maria R, Deng J et al (2013) Protein pathway activation mapping of colorectal metastatic progression reveals metastasis-specific network alterations. Clin Exp Metastasis 30(3):309–316PubMedCrossRef Silvestri A, Calvert V, Belluco C, Lipsky M, De Maria R, Deng J et al (2013) Protein pathway activation mapping of colorectal metastatic progression reveals metastasis-specific network alterations. Clin Exp Metastasis 30(3):309–316PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Awada A, Garcia AA, Chan S, Jerusalem GH, Coleman RE, Huizing MT, Mehdi A, O’Reilly SM, Hamm JT, Barrett-Lee PJ, Cocquyt V, Sideras K, Young DE, Zhao C, Chia YL, Hoch U, Hannah AL, Perez EA, NKTR-102 Study Group (2013) Two schedules of etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer: a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 14(12):1216–1225. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70429-7 PubMedCrossRef Awada A, Garcia AA, Chan S, Jerusalem GH, Coleman RE, Huizing MT, Mehdi A, O’Reilly SM, Hamm JT, Barrett-Lee PJ, Cocquyt V, Sideras K, Young DE, Zhao C, Chia YL, Hoch U, Hannah AL, Perez EA, NKTR-102 Study Group (2013) Two schedules of etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer: a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 14(12):1216–1225. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(13)70429-7 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hoch U, Fry DG, Chia YL, Caygill K, Hannah AL, Perez EA, Cortez J, Awada A, O’Shaughnessy J, Twelves C, Rugo HS, Im S-H, Xu B, Anderes KL, Davis DW (2013) Etirinotecan pegol (EP) target-specific pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers measured in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients in the phase III BEACON study in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). J Clin Oncol 31:2318 [(suppl; abstr 1087). 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting] Hoch U, Fry DG, Chia YL, Caygill K, Hannah AL, Perez EA, Cortez J, Awada A, O’Shaughnessy J, Twelves C, Rugo HS, Im S-H, Xu B, Anderes KL, Davis DW (2013) Etirinotecan pegol (EP) target-specific pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers measured in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients in the phase III BEACON study in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). J Clin Oncol 31:2318 [(suppl; abstr 1087). 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting]
Metadata
Title
A pilot study utilizing multi-omic molecular profiling to find potential targets and select individualized treatments for patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer
Authors
Gayle S. Jameson
Emanuel F. Petricoin
Jasgit Sachdev
Lance A. Liotta
David M. Loesch
Stephen P. Anthony
Manpreet K. Chadha
Julia D. Wulfkuhle
Rosa I. Gallagher
Kimberley A. Reeder
Mariaelena Pierobon
Monica R. Fulk
Nina A. Cantafio
Bryant Dunetz
William D. Mikrut
Daniel D. Von Hoff
Nicholas J. Robert
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3117-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine