Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014

Open Access 01-08-2014 | Clinical trial

TBCRC 018: phase II study of iniparib in combination with irinotecan to treat progressive triple negative breast cancer brain metastases

Authors: Carey Anders, Allison M. Deal, Vandana Abramson, Minetta C. Liu, Anna M. Storniolo, John T. Carpenter, Shannon Puhalla, Rita Nanda, Amal Melhem-Bertrandt, Nancy U. Lin, P. Kelly Marcom, Catherine Van Poznak, Vered Stearns, Michelle Melisko, J. Keith Smith, Olga Karginova, Joel Parker, Jonathan Berg, Eric P. Winer, Amy Peterman, Aleix Prat, Charles M. Perou, Antonio C. Wolff, Lisa A. Carey

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Nearly half of patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) develop brain metastases (BM) and most will also have uncontrolled extracranial disease. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of iniparib, a small molecule anti-cancer agent that alters reactive oxygen species tumor metabolism and penetrates the blood brain barrier, with the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan in patients with TNBC-BM. Eligible patients had TNBC with new or progressive BM and received irinotecan and iniparib every 3 weeks. Time to progression (TTP) was the primary end point; secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and health-related quality of life. Correlative endpoints included molecular subtyping and gene expression studies on pre-treatment archival tissues, and determination of germline BRCA1/2 status. Thirty-seven patients began treatment; 34 were evaluable for efficacy. Five of 24 patients were known to carry a BRCA germline mutation (4 BRCA1, 1 BRCA2). Median TTP was 2.14 months and median OS was 7.8 months. Intracranial RR was 12 %, while intracranial CBR was 27 %. Treatment was well-tolerated; the most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia and fatigue. Grade 3/4 diarrhea was rare (3 %). Intrinsic subtyping revealed 19 of 21 tumors (79 %) were basal-like, and intracranial response was associated with high expression of proliferation-related genes. This study suggests a modest benefit of irinotecan plus iniparib in progressive TNBC-BM. More importantly, this trial design is feasible and lays the foundation for additional studies for this treatment-refractory disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lin NU et al (2008) Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 113(10):2638–2645PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lin NU et al (2008) Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 113(10):2638–2645PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Niwińska A, Murawska M, Pogoda K (2010) Breast cancer brain metastases: differences in survival depending on biological subtype, RPA RTOG prognostic class and systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Ann Oncol 21(5):942–948PubMedCrossRef Niwińska A, Murawska M, Pogoda K (2010) Breast cancer brain metastases: differences in survival depending on biological subtype, RPA RTOG prognostic class and systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Ann Oncol 21(5):942–948PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Niwińska A, Murawska M, Pogoda K (2010) Breast cancer subtypes and response to systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases. Cancer 116(18):4238–4247PubMedCrossRef Niwińska A, Murawska M, Pogoda K (2010) Breast cancer subtypes and response to systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases. Cancer 116(18):4238–4247PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Licht S, et al. (2011) Mechanism of action of iniparib: stimulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in an iniparib-sensitive breast cancer cell line. Mol Cancer Ther 10(11 Suppl: Abstract A226) Licht S, et al. (2011) Mechanism of action of iniparib: stimulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in an iniparib-sensitive breast cancer cell line. Mol Cancer Ther 10(11 Suppl: Abstract A226)
5.
go back to reference Castro M, Li L, Stallings T (2010) Pharmacokinetics of BSI-201, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibitor, in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of a patient with breast cancer with carcinomatous meningitis. J Clin Oncol (Meet Abstr) 28:e13559 Castro M, Li L, Stallings T (2010) Pharmacokinetics of BSI-201, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibitor, in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of a patient with breast cancer with carcinomatous meningitis. J Clin Oncol (Meet Abstr) 28:e13559
6.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy J et al (2011) A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol 29(S):1007 O’Shaughnessy J et al (2011) A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol 29(S):1007
7.
go back to reference Perez EA et al (2004) Randomized phase II study of two irinotecan schedules for patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to an anthracycline, a taxane, or both. J Clin Oncol 22(14):2849–2855PubMedCrossRef Perez EA et al (2004) Randomized phase II study of two irinotecan schedules for patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to an anthracycline, a taxane, or both. J Clin Oncol 22(14):2849–2855PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy J, et al. (2007) Preliminary results of a randomized phase II study of weekly irinotecan/carboplatin with or without cetuximab in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106(Suppl 1 Abstract 308) O’Shaughnessy J, et al. (2007) Preliminary results of a randomized phase II study of weekly irinotecan/carboplatin with or without cetuximab in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106(Suppl 1 Abstract 308)
9.
go back to reference BiPar (2011) BSI-201 Investigator’s Brochure BiPar (2011) BSI-201 Investigator’s Brochure
10.
go back to reference Vredenburgh JJ et al (2007) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 25(30):4722–4729PubMedCrossRef Vredenburgh JJ et al (2007) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 25(30):4722–4729PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moulder S, et al. (2010) A phase 1b study to assess the safety and tolerability of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In: San Antonio breast cancer symposium. 2010 Moulder S, et al. (2010) A phase 1b study to assess the safety and tolerability of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In: San Antonio breast cancer symposium. 2010
12.
go back to reference Blakeley J et al (2010) Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibitor BSI-201 in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 28(15S):2012A Blakeley J et al (2010) Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibitor BSI-201 in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 28(15S):2012A
13.
go back to reference Lin NU et al (2008) Phase II trial of lapatinib for brain metastases in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(12):1993–1999PubMedCrossRef Lin NU et al (2008) Phase II trial of lapatinib for brain metastases in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(12):1993–1999PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lin NU et al (2009) Multicenter phase II study of lapatinib in patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15(4):1452–1459PubMedCrossRef Lin NU et al (2009) Multicenter phase II study of lapatinib in patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15(4):1452–1459PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eisenhauer E et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247PubMedCrossRef Eisenhauer E et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Geiss GK et al (2008) Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs. Nat Biotechnol 26(3):317–325PubMedCrossRef Geiss GK et al (2008) Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs. Nat Biotechnol 26(3):317–325PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Nielsen TO et al (2010) A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16(21):5222–5232PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nielsen TO et al (2010) A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16(21):5222–5232PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Brady MJ et al (1997) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15(3):974–986PubMed Brady MJ et al (1997) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15(3):974–986PubMed
22.
go back to reference Weitzner MA et al (1995) The functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) scale. Development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors. Cancer 75(5):1151–1161PubMedCrossRef Weitzner MA et al (1995) The functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) scale. Development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors. Cancer 75(5):1151–1161PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cella DF et al (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579PubMed Cella DF et al (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579PubMed
24.
go back to reference Epstein B (1960) Statistical life test acceptance procedures. Technometrics 2.4(4):435–446CrossRef Epstein B (1960) Statistical life test acceptance procedures. Technometrics 2.4(4):435–446CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(9):5116–5121PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(9):5116–5121PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2008) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44–57CrossRef Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2008) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44–57CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gaspar LE et al (2000) Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(4):1001–1006PubMedCrossRef Gaspar LE et al (2000) Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(4):1001–1006PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Carey LA et al (2012) TBCRC 001: randomized phase II study of cetuximab in combination with carboplatin in stage IV triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(21):2615–2623PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Carey LA et al (2012) TBCRC 001: randomized phase II study of cetuximab in combination with carboplatin in stage IV triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(21):2615–2623PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Baselga J, et al. (2013) Randomized phase II study of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(20):2586–2592 Baselga J, et al. (2013) Randomized phase II study of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(20):2586–2592
31.
go back to reference Lin N, Gelman R, Younger W et al (2013) Phase II trial of carboplatin (C) and bevacizumab (BEV) in patients (pts) with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). J Clin Oncol 31 (suppl; abstr 513) Lin N, Gelman R, Younger W et al (2013) Phase II trial of carboplatin (C) and bevacizumab (BEV) in patients (pts) with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). J Clin Oncol 31 (suppl; abstr 513)
32.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy J et al (2011) Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 364(3):205–214PubMedCrossRef O’Shaughnessy J et al (2011) Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 364(3):205–214PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Prat A, et al. (2012) Gene expression-based predictors of chemotherapy response in basal-like breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30 (suppl; abstr 10500) Prat A, et al. (2012) Gene expression-based predictors of chemotherapy response in basal-like breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30 (suppl; abstr 10500)
34.
go back to reference Lin NU et al (2013) Challenges relating to solid tumour brain metastases in clinical trials, part 2: neurocognitive, neurological, and quality-of-life outcomes. A report from the RANO group. Lancet 14(10):e407–e416CrossRef Lin NU et al (2013) Challenges relating to solid tumour brain metastases in clinical trials, part 2: neurocognitive, neurological, and quality-of-life outcomes. A report from the RANO group. Lancet 14(10):e407–e416CrossRef
Metadata
Title
TBCRC 018: phase II study of iniparib in combination with irinotecan to treat progressive triple negative breast cancer brain metastases
Authors
Carey Anders
Allison M. Deal
Vandana Abramson
Minetta C. Liu
Anna M. Storniolo
John T. Carpenter
Shannon Puhalla
Rita Nanda
Amal Melhem-Bertrandt
Nancy U. Lin
P. Kelly Marcom
Catherine Van Poznak
Vered Stearns
Michelle Melisko
J. Keith Smith
Olga Karginova
Joel Parker
Jonathan Berg
Eric P. Winer
Amy Peterman
Aleix Prat
Charles M. Perou
Antonio C. Wolff
Lisa A. Carey
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3039-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine