Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014

01-07-2014 | Brief Report

Mortality outcome among medically underserved women screened through a publicly funded breast cancer control program, 1997–2007

Authors: Soumitra Sudip Bhuyan, Jim P. Stimpson, Shireen S. Rajaram, Ge Lin

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess treatment and mortality differences between women diagnosed with breast cancer through Nebraska’s Every Woman Matters (EWM) program and women diagnosed through other sources.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed using 10 years of Nebraska Cancer Registry and EWM program data on women aged 40–74 years. This study used chi-square and multivariate logistic regression with mortality as the outcome of interest.

Results

From 1997 to 2007, 4,739 women were diagnosed with breast cancer, 435 (9.1 %) of whom were diagnosed through EWM. The EWM and non-EWM groups differed significantly in age, race, marital status, location of residence at the time of diagnosis, neighborhood poverty level at the time of diagnosis, tumor stage at diagnosis, and chemotherapy. No significant differences were found between the two groups in radiation therapy, surgical resection, and hormone therapy. In both 1- and 5-year multivariate mortality models, the odds of dying for those in the EWM program were not statistically significantly different from the odds of dying for those not in the EWM program. In the 1-year mortality model, residents of urban metropolitan counties (OR 2.079; 95 % CI 1.663–2.598) had an increased odds of dying compared to residents of rural counties. In the 5-year mortality model, black women (OR 2.239; 95 % CI 1.453–3.450), residents of areas with a high (more than 20 %) neighborhood poverty level at the time of diagnosis (OR 1.589; 95 % CI 1.204–2.097), and unmarried women (OR 1.334; 95 % CI 1.164–1.528) had higher odds of death. Both groups have received similar treatments.

Conclusions

Targeted outreach to vulnerable groups for cancer screening may improve cancer outcomes and reduce disparities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Masi CM, Blackman DJ, Peek ME (2007) Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority women. Med Care Res Rev 64(5 Suppl):195S–242SPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Masi CM, Blackman DJ, Peek ME (2007) Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority women. Med Care Res Rev 64(5 Suppl):195S–242SPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Henson RM, Wyatt SW, Lee NC (1996) The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program: a comprehensive public health response to two major health issues for women. J Public Health Manag Pract 2(2):36–47PubMed Henson RM, Wyatt SW, Lee NC (1996) The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program: a comprehensive public health response to two major health issues for women. J Public Health Manag Pract 2(2):36–47PubMed
3.
go back to reference Feresu SA, Zhang W, Puumala SE, Ullrich F, Anderson JR (2008) Breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women in Nebraska: findings from the every woman matters program, 1993–2004. J Health Care Poor Underserved 19(3):797–813PubMedCrossRef Feresu SA, Zhang W, Puumala SE, Ullrich F, Anderson JR (2008) Breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women in Nebraska: findings from the every woman matters program, 1993–2004. J Health Care Poor Underserved 19(3):797–813PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Richardson LC, Schulman J, Sever LE, Lee NC, Coate RJ (2001) Early-stage breast cancer treatment among medically underserved women diagnosed in a national screening program, 1992–1995. Breast Cancer Res Treat 69(2):133–142PubMedCrossRef Richardson LC, Schulman J, Sever LE, Lee NC, Coate RJ (2001) Early-stage breast cancer treatment among medically underserved women diagnosed in a national screening program, 1992–1995. Breast Cancer Res Treat 69(2):133–142PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tamer R, Voti L, Fleming LE, MacKinnon J, Thompson D, Blake M et al (2003) A feasibility study of the evaluation of the Florida breast cancer early detection program using the statewide cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 81(3):187–194PubMedCrossRef Tamer R, Voti L, Fleming LE, MacKinnon J, Thompson D, Blake M et al (2003) A feasibility study of the evaluation of the Florida breast cancer early detection program using the statewide cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 81(3):187–194PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Liu MJ, Hawk H, Gershman ST, Smith SM, Karacek R, Woodford ML et al (2005) The effects of a national breast and cervical cancer early detection program on social disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in massachusetts. Cancer Causes Control 16(1):27–33PubMedCrossRef Liu MJ, Hawk H, Gershman ST, Smith SM, Karacek R, Woodford ML et al (2005) The effects of a national breast and cervical cancer early detection program on social disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in massachusetts. Cancer Causes Control 16(1):27–33PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Richardson LC, Royalty J, Howe W, Helsel W, Kammerer W, Benard VB (2010) Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program, 1996–2005. Am J Public Health 100(9):1769–1776PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Richardson LC, Royalty J, Howe W, Helsel W, Kammerer W, Benard VB (2010) Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program, 1996–2005. Am J Public Health 100(9):1769–1776PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lin G, Ma J, Zhang L, Qu M (2013) Linking cancer registry and hospital discharge data for treatment surveillance. Health Inform J 19:127CrossRef Lin G, Ma J, Zhang L, Qu M (2013) Linking cancer registry and hospital discharge data for treatment surveillance. Health Inform J 19:127CrossRef
12.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health: Comparative Staging Guideline for Cancer. Version 1.1, NIH Publication No. 93–364, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda (MD): 1993 National Institutes of Health: Comparative Staging Guideline for Cancer. Version 1.1, NIH Publication No. 93–364, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda (MD): 1993
15.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc., SAS Campus Drive, Cary, North Carolina SAS Institute Inc., SAS Campus Drive, Cary, North Carolina
16.
go back to reference Coughlin SS, King J (2010) Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the united states by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006. BMC Public Health 10:146PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Coughlin SS, King J (2010) Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the united states by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006. BMC Public Health 10:146PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Edwards QT, Li AX, Pike MC, Kolonel LN, Ursin G, Henderson BE et al (2009) Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115(1):163–170PubMedCrossRef Edwards QT, Li AX, Pike MC, Kolonel LN, Ursin G, Henderson BE et al (2009) Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115(1):163–170PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA (2008) Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med 66(2):260–275PubMedCrossRef Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA (2008) Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med 66(2):260–275PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Meissner HI, Breen N, Taubman ML, Vernon SW, Graubard BI (2007) Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control 18(1):61–70PubMedCrossRef Meissner HI, Breen N, Taubman ML, Vernon SW, Graubard BI (2007) Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control 18(1):61–70PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Celaya MO, Berke EM, Onega TL, Gui J, Riddle BL, Cherala SS, Rees JR (2010) Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998–2004). Rural Remote Health 10(2):1361 Celaya MO, Berke EM, Onega TL, Gui J, Riddle BL, Cherala SS, Rees JR (2010) Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998–2004). Rural Remote Health 10(2):1361
23.
go back to reference Gerend MA, Pai M (2008) Social determinants of black-white disparities in breast cancer mortality: a review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17:2913–2923CrossRef Gerend MA, Pai M (2008) Social determinants of black-white disparities in breast cancer mortality: a review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17:2913–2923CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Aizer AA, Chen MH, McCarthy EP, Mendu ML, Koo S, Wilhite TJ, Graham PL, Choueiri TK, Hoffman KE, Martin NE, Hu JC, Nguyen PL (2013) Marital status and survival in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3869–3876PubMedCrossRef Aizer AA, Chen MH, McCarthy EP, Mendu ML, Koo S, Wilhite TJ, Graham PL, Choueiri TK, Hoffman KE, Martin NE, Hu JC, Nguyen PL (2013) Marital status and survival in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3869–3876PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kroenke CH, Michael Y, Tindle H, Gage E, Chlebowski R, Garcia L, Messina C, Manson JE, Caan BJ (2012) Social networks, social support and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(1):375–385PubMedCrossRef Kroenke CH, Michael Y, Tindle H, Gage E, Chlebowski R, Garcia L, Messina C, Manson JE, Caan BJ (2012) Social networks, social support and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(1):375–385PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Silliman RA, Dukes KA, Sullivan LM, Kaplan SH (1998) Breast cancer care in older women: sources of information, social support, and emotional health outcomes. Cancer. 83:706–711 Silliman RA, Dukes KA, Sullivan LM, Kaplan SH (1998) Breast cancer care in older women: sources of information, social support, and emotional health outcomes. Cancer. 83:706–711
27.
go back to reference Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, Holmes MD, Kawachi I (2006) Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1105–1111PubMedCrossRef Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, Holmes MD, Kawachi I (2006) Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1105–1111PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Roetzheim RG, Ferrante JM, Lee JH, Chen R, Love-Jackson KM, Gonzalez EC et al (2012) Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among medicare beneficiaries. Ann Fam Med 10(5):401–411PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Roetzheim RG, Ferrante JM, Lee JH, Chen R, Love-Jackson KM, Gonzalez EC et al (2012) Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among medicare beneficiaries. Ann Fam Med 10(5):401–411PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wirtz HS, Boudreau DM, Gralow JR, Barlow WE, Gray S, Bowles EJ et al (2014) Factors associated with long-term adherence to annual surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(3):541–550PubMedCrossRef Wirtz HS, Boudreau DM, Gralow JR, Barlow WE, Gray S, Bowles EJ et al (2014) Factors associated with long-term adherence to annual surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(3):541–550PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Field TS, Doubeni C, Fox MP, Buist DS, Wei F, Geiger AM et al (2008) Underutilization of surveillance mammography among older breast cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med 23(2):158–163PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Field TS, Doubeni C, Fox MP, Buist DS, Wei F, Geiger AM et al (2008) Underutilization of surveillance mammography among older breast cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med 23(2):158–163PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wagner L (2004) The hidden costs of cancer care: an overview with implications and referral resources for oncology nurses. Clin J Oncol Nurs 8:279–287PubMedCrossRef Wagner L (2004) The hidden costs of cancer care: an overview with implications and referral resources for oncology nurses. Clin J Oncol Nurs 8:279–287PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Shavers VL, Brown ML (2002) Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(5):334–357PubMedCrossRef Shavers VL, Brown ML (2002) Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(5):334–357PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Boyer-Chammard A, Taylor TH, Anton-Culver H (1999) Survival differences in breast cancer among racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer Detect Prev 23(6):463–473PubMedCrossRef Boyer-Chammard A, Taylor TH, Anton-Culver H (1999) Survival differences in breast cancer among racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer Detect Prev 23(6):463–473PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Schoen C, Doty MM, Robertson RH, Collins SR (2011) Affordable care act reforms could reduce the number of underinsured US adults by 70 percent. Health Aff 30(9):1762–1771CrossRef Schoen C, Doty MM, Robertson RH, Collins SR (2011) Affordable care act reforms could reduce the number of underinsured US adults by 70 percent. Health Aff 30(9):1762–1771CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mortality outcome among medically underserved women screened through a publicly funded breast cancer control program, 1997–2007
Authors
Soumitra Sudip Bhuyan
Jim P. Stimpson
Shireen S. Rajaram
Ge Lin
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2992-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine