Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014

Open Access 01-07-2014 | Brief Report

Somatic mutation load of estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors predicts overall survival: an analysis of genome sequence data

Authors: Svasti Haricharan, Matthew N. Bainbridge, Paul Scheet, Powel H. Brown

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women. While there are several effective therapies for breast cancer and important single gene prognostic/predictive markers, more than 40,000 women die from this disease every year. The increasing availability of large-scale genomic datasets provides opportunities for identifying factors that influence breast cancer survival in smaller, well-defined subsets. The purpose of this study was to investigate the genomic landscape of various breast cancer subtypes and its potential associations with clinical outcomes. We used statistical analysis of sequence data generated by the Cancer Genome Atlas initiative including somatic mutation load (SML) analysis, Kaplan–Meier survival curves, gene mutational frequency, and mutational enrichment evaluation to study the genomic landscape of breast cancer. We show that ER+, but not ER, tumors with high SML associate with poor overall survival (HR = 2.02). Further, these high mutation load tumors are enriched for coincident mutations in both DNA damage repair and ER signature genes. While it is known that somatic mutations in specific genes affect breast cancer survival, this study is the first to identify that SML may constitute an important global signature for a subset of ER+ tumors prone to high mortality. Moreover, although somatic mutations in individual DNA damage genes affect clinical outcome, our results indicate that coincident mutations in DNA damage response and signature ER genes may prove more informative for ER+ breast cancer survival. Next generation sequencing may prove an essential tool for identifying pathways underlying poor outcomes and for tailoring therapeutic strategies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abell K et al (2005) Stat3-induced apoptosis requires a molecular switch in PI(3)K subunit composition. Nat Cell Biol 7(4):392–398PubMedCrossRef Abell K et al (2005) Stat3-induced apoptosis requires a molecular switch in PI(3)K subunit composition. Nat Cell Biol 7(4):392–398PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL (2009) Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 9(9):631–643PubMedCrossRef Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL (2009) Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 9(9):631–643PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ellis MJ et al (2012) Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition. Nature 486(7403):353–360PubMedCentralPubMed Ellis MJ et al (2012) Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition. Nature 486(7403):353–360PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Arpino G et al (2005) Estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer: association with growth factor receptor expression and tamoxifen resistance. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(17):1254–1261PubMedCrossRef Arpino G et al (2005) Estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer: association with growth factor receptor expression and tamoxifen resistance. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(17):1254–1261PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lakhani SR et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20(9):2310–2318PubMedCrossRef Lakhani SR et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20(9):2310–2318PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sorlie T et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sorlie T et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kobayashi H et al (2013) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes (Review). Oncol Rep 30(3):1019–1029PubMed Kobayashi H et al (2013) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes (Review). Oncol Rep 30(3):1019–1029PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mar VJ et al. (2013) BRAF/NRAS wild-type melanomas have a high mutation load correlating with histological and molecular signatures of UV damage. Clin Cancer Res 19(17):4589–4598 Mar VJ et al. (2013) BRAF/NRAS wild-type melanomas have a high mutation load correlating with histological and molecular signatures of UV damage. Clin Cancer Res 19(17):4589–4598
10.
go back to reference Yu JL et al (2002) Effect of p53 status on tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy. Science 295(5559):1526–1528PubMedCrossRef Yu JL et al (2002) Effect of p53 status on tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy. Science 295(5559):1526–1528PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bonnet F et al (2012) An array CGH based genomic instability index (G2I) is predictive of clinical outcome in breast cancer and reveals a subset of tumors without lymph node involvement but with poor prognosis. BMC Med Genomics 5:54PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bonnet F et al (2012) An array CGH based genomic instability index (G2I) is predictive of clinical outcome in breast cancer and reveals a subset of tumors without lymph node involvement but with poor prognosis. BMC Med Genomics 5:54PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Donehower LA et al (2013) MLH1-silenced and non-silenced subgroups of hypermutated colorectal carcinomas have distinct mutational landscapes. J Pathol 229(1):99–110PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Donehower LA et al (2013) MLH1-silenced and non-silenced subgroups of hypermutated colorectal carcinomas have distinct mutational landscapes. J Pathol 229(1):99–110PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas N (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490(7418):61–70CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas N (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490(7418):61–70CrossRef
15.
go back to reference R-Development-Core-Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria R-Development-Core-Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
16.
go back to reference Cizkova M et al (2012) PIK3CA mutation impact on survival in breast cancer patients and in ERalpha, PR and ERBB2-based subgroups. Breast Cancer Res 14(1):R28PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cizkova M et al (2012) PIK3CA mutation impact on survival in breast cancer patients and in ERalpha, PR and ERBB2-based subgroups. Breast Cancer Res 14(1):R28PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Depowski PL, Rosenthal SI, Ross JS (2001) Loss of expression of the PTEN gene protein product is associated with poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 14(7):672–676PubMedCrossRef Depowski PL, Rosenthal SI, Ross JS (2001) Loss of expression of the PTEN gene protein product is associated with poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 14(7):672–676PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Alkarain A, Jordan R, Slingerland J (2004) p27 deregulation in breast cancer: prognostic significance and implications for therapy. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 9(1):67–80PubMedCrossRef Alkarain A, Jordan R, Slingerland J (2004) p27 deregulation in breast cancer: prognostic significance and implications for therapy. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 9(1):67–80PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Loi S et al (2009) Gene expression profiling identifies activated growth factor signaling in poor prognosis (Luminal-B) estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. BMC Med Genomics 2:37PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Loi S et al (2009) Gene expression profiling identifies activated growth factor signaling in poor prognosis (Luminal-B) estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. BMC Med Genomics 2:37PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schneider J et al (2006) Identification and meta-analysis of a small gene expression signature for the diagnosis of estrogen receptor status in invasive ductal breast cancer. Int J Cancer 119(12):2974–2979PubMedCrossRef Schneider J et al (2006) Identification and meta-analysis of a small gene expression signature for the diagnosis of estrogen receptor status in invasive ductal breast cancer. Int J Cancer 119(12):2974–2979PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Frasor J et al (2003) Profiling of estrogen up- and down-regulated gene expression in human breast cancer cells: insights into gene networks and pathways underlying estrogenic control of proliferation and cell phenotype. Endocrinology 144(10):4562–4574PubMedCrossRef Frasor J et al (2003) Profiling of estrogen up- and down-regulated gene expression in human breast cancer cells: insights into gene networks and pathways underlying estrogenic control of proliferation and cell phenotype. Endocrinology 144(10):4562–4574PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jagannathan V, Robinson-Rechavi M (2011) Meta-analysis of estrogen response in MCF-7 distinguishes early target genes involved in signaling and cell proliferation from later target genes involved in cell cycle and DNA repair. BMC Syst Biol 5:138PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jagannathan V, Robinson-Rechavi M (2011) Meta-analysis of estrogen response in MCF-7 distinguishes early target genes involved in signaling and cell proliferation from later target genes involved in cell cycle and DNA repair. BMC Syst Biol 5:138PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Balogh GA, Heulings RC, Russo J (2006) The mismatch repair gene hPMS2 is mutated in primary breast cancer. Int J Mol Med 18(5):853–857PubMed Balogh GA, Heulings RC, Russo J (2006) The mismatch repair gene hPMS2 is mutated in primary breast cancer. Int J Mol Med 18(5):853–857PubMed
25.
go back to reference Poplawski T et al (2005) Polymorphisms of the DNA mismatch repair gene HMSH2 in breast cancer occurence and progression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94(3):199–204PubMedCrossRef Poplawski T et al (2005) Polymorphisms of the DNA mismatch repair gene HMSH2 in breast cancer occurence and progression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94(3):199–204PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Alexandrov LB et al (2013) Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500(7463):415–421 Alexandrov LB et al (2013) Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500(7463):415–421
Metadata
Title
Somatic mutation load of estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors predicts overall survival: an analysis of genome sequence data
Authors
Svasti Haricharan
Matthew N. Bainbridge
Paul Scheet
Powel H. Brown
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2991-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine