Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2009

01-05-2009 | Epidemiology

Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort

Authors: Quannetta T. Edwards, Arthur X. Li, Malcolm C. Pike, Laurence N. Kolonel, Giske Ursin, Brian E. Henderson, Roberta McKean-Cowdin

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Women’s regular use of mammography over a 6 year interval was examined among women aged 45–75 in the Hawaii and Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort (MEC). The analyses included 81,722 African American, Japanese, Latina, Native Hawaiian, and White females using self-reported mammography history from 1993 to 1998. Ninety-one percent of MEC women reported ever having a mammogram, however only 36% reported regular annual and 48% reported regular biennial mammography over the interval. Mammography was lowest among women who were obese, had a high school education or less, or who were aged 70 and over. Regular mammography use during follow-up was low compared to prior studies reporting on recent mammography. African American, Latina, and Native Hawaiian women had significantly lower annual and biennial mammography use compared to White women even after controlling for age, education, family history, body mass index and hormone therapy indicating that gaps exist in mammography that remain unexplained by known predictors of screening behavior.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2006) Cancer facts and figures 2006. American Cancer Society, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2006) Cancer facts and figures 2006. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
2.
go back to reference Hunt KA, Rosen EL, Sickles EA (1999) Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24, 211 examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(2):285–289PubMed Hunt KA, Rosen EL, Sickles EA (1999) Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24, 211 examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(2):285–289PubMed
3.
go back to reference Michaelson JS, Satija S, Moore R, Weber G, Halpern E, Garland A et al (2002) The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences. Cancer 2002(94):37–42CrossRef Michaelson JS, Satija S, Moore R, Weber G, Halpern E, Garland A et al (2002) The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences. Cancer 2002(94):37–42CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Lurie N, Abraham L, Barbash RB, Strzelczyk J et al (2006) Does utilization screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med 144:451–553 Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Lurie N, Abraham L, Barbash RB, Strzelczyk J et al (2006) Does utilization screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med 144:451–553
8.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics (2006) Health, United States, 2006 with Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans, vol. 11 December 2006: Hyattsville, MD National Center for Health Statistics (2006) Health, United States, 2006 with Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans, vol. 11 December 2006: Hyattsville, MD
9.
go back to reference Ghafoor A, Jemal A, Ward E, Cokkinides V, Smith R, Thun M (2003) Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity. CA Cancer J Clin 53:342–355PubMedCrossRef Ghafoor A, Jemal A, Ward E, Cokkinides V, Smith R, Thun M (2003) Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity. CA Cancer J Clin 53:342–355PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, Nomura AMY, Wilkens LR, Pike MC et al (2000) A multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characterisitcs. Am J Epidemiol 151(4):346–357PubMed Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, Nomura AMY, Wilkens LR, Pike MC et al (2000) A multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characterisitcs. Am J Epidemiol 151(4):346–357PubMed
11.
go back to reference Pike MC, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Wilkens LR, Hankin JH, Feigelson HS et al (2002) Breast cancer in a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: risk factor-adjusted incidence in Japanese equals and in Hawaiians exceeds that in Whites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:795–800PubMed Pike MC, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Wilkens LR, Hankin JH, Feigelson HS et al (2002) Breast cancer in a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: risk factor-adjusted incidence in Japanese equals and in Hawaiians exceeds that in Whites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:795–800PubMed
12.
go back to reference Klein RJ, Schoenborn CA (2001) Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population. Healthy People Statistical Notes, no. 20. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland Klein RJ, Schoenborn CA (2001) Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population. Healthy People Statistical Notes, no. 20. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland
13.
go back to reference Jones BA, Patterson EA, Calvocoressi L (2003) Mammography screening in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 97(1 Suppl):258–272 Jones BA, Patterson EA, Calvocoressi L (2003) Mammography screening in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 97(1 Suppl):258–272
14.
go back to reference Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Puri D, Weissman J, Moy B, Kopans DB et al (2004) Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival. Cancer 101:495–507PubMedCrossRef Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Puri D, Weissman J, Moy B, Kopans DB et al (2004) Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival. Cancer 101:495–507PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lee JR-J, Vogel VG (1995) Who uses screening mammography regularly? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:901–906PubMed Lee JR-J, Vogel VG (1995) Who uses screening mammography regularly? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:901–906PubMed
16.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer fact & figures for African-Americans 2007–2008. American Cancer Society, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer fact & figures for African-Americans 2007–2008. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
17.
go back to reference Maskarinec G, Zhang Y, Takata Y, Pagano I, Shumay DM, Goodman MT et al (2006) Trends of breast cancer incidence and risk factor prevalence over 25 years. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:45–55PubMedCrossRef Maskarinec G, Zhang Y, Takata Y, Pagano I, Shumay DM, Goodman MT et al (2006) Trends of breast cancer incidence and risk factor prevalence over 25 years. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:45–55PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW, Breen N, Rimer B, Clark MA (2006) Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(11):2093–2101PubMedCrossRef Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW, Breen N, Rimer B, Clark MA (2006) Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(11):2093–2101PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L (2004) Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States 2000. Cancer Causes Control 15:159–170PubMedCrossRef Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L (2004) Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States 2000. Cancer Causes Control 15:159–170PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Harrison RV, Janz NK, Wolfe RA, Tedeschi PJ, Huang X, McMahon LF (2003) 5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women. Cancer 97:1147–1155PubMedCrossRef Harrison RV, Janz NK, Wolfe RA, Tedeschi PJ, Huang X, McMahon LF (2003) 5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women. Cancer 97:1147–1155PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kagay CR, Quale C, Smith-Bindman R (2006) Screening mammography in the American elderly. Am J Epidemiol 31(2):142–149 Kagay CR, Quale C, Smith-Bindman R (2006) Screening mammography in the American elderly. Am J Epidemiol 31(2):142–149
22.
go back to reference Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BKS (2002) Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:347–360PubMed Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BKS (2002) Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:347–360PubMed
23.
go back to reference Barth RJ, Gibson GR, Carney PA, Mott LA, Becher RD, Poplack SP (2005) Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. Am J Roentgenol 183:324–329 Barth RJ, Gibson GR, Carney PA, Mott LA, Becher RD, Poplack SP (2005) Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. Am J Roentgenol 183:324–329
24.
go back to reference Carmichael A (2006) Obesity as a risk factor for development and poor prognosis of breast cancer. BJOG 113:1160–1166PubMedCrossRef Carmichael A (2006) Obesity as a risk factor for development and poor prognosis of breast cancer. BJOG 113:1160–1166PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference MKDJ Li CI (2006) Interactions between body mass index and hormone therapy and postmenopausal breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer 17:695–703 MKDJ Li CI (2006) Interactions between body mass index and hormone therapy and postmenopausal breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer 17:695–703
26.
go back to reference Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Phillips RS (2004) Obesity and breast cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 19:324–331PubMedCrossRef Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Phillips RS (2004) Obesity and breast cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 19:324–331PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zhu K, Whu H, Jatoi I, Potter J, Shriver C (2006) Body mass index and use of mammography screening in the United States. Prev Med 42(5):381–385PubMedCrossRef Zhu K, Whu H, Jatoi I, Potter J, Shriver C (2006) Body mass index and use of mammography screening in the United States. Prev Med 42(5):381–385PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fontaine KR, Heo M, Allison DB (2001) Body weight and cancer screening among women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 10(5):463–470PubMedCrossRef Fontaine KR, Heo M, Allison DB (2001) Body weight and cancer screening among women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 10(5):463–470PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rivera S, Vernon SW, Tiro JA, Coan SH, del Junco D, Chan W et al (2006) Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans. Prev Med 42:320–326PubMedCrossRef Rivera S, Vernon SW, Tiro JA, Coan SH, del Junco D, Chan W et al (2006) Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans. Prev Med 42:320–326PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Suarez L, Goldman DA, Weiss NS (1995) Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population. Am J Prev Med 11(2):94–98PubMed Suarez L, Goldman DA, Weiss NS (1995) Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population. Am J Prev Med 11(2):94–98PubMed
31.
go back to reference Tumiel-Berhalter L, Finney M, Jaen C (2004) Self-report and primary care medical record documentation of mammography and Pap smear utilization among low-income women. J Natl Medl Assoc 96(12):1632–1639 Tumiel-Berhalter L, Finney M, Jaen C (2004) Self-report and primary care medical record documentation of mammography and Pap smear utilization among low-income women. J Natl Medl Assoc 96(12):1632–1639
32.
go back to reference Holt K, Franks P, Meldrum S, Fiscella K (2006) Mammography self-report and mammography claims. Med Care 44(6):513–517PubMedCrossRef Holt K, Franks P, Meldrum S, Fiscella K (2006) Mammography self-report and mammography claims. Med Care 44(6):513–517PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Duffy SW, Tabar T, Vitak B, Yen MF, Warwick J, Smith RA et al (2003) The Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening: cluster randomisation and end point evaluation. Ann Oncol 14:1196–1198PubMedCrossRef Duffy SW, Tabar T, Vitak B, Yen MF, Warwick J, Smith RA et al (2003) The Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening: cluster randomisation and end point evaluation. Ann Oncol 14:1196–1198PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen H-HT, Yen M-F, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials. Organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731PubMedCrossRef Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen H-HT, Yen M-F, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials. Organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Gotzsche P, Nielsen M (2006) Screening for breast cancer with mammography (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001877 Gotzsche P, Nielsen M (2006) Screening for breast cancer with mammography (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001877
36.
go back to reference Cortesi L, Chiuri VE, Ruscelli S, Bellelli V, Negri R, Rashid I et al (2006) Prognosis of screen-detected breast cancers: results of a population based-study. BMC Cancer 6 Cortesi L, Chiuri VE, Ruscelli S, Bellelli V, Negri R, Rashid I et al (2006) Prognosis of screen-detected breast cancers: results of a population based-study. BMC Cancer 6
37.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy people 2010, 2nd edn. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health, vol. 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy people 2010, 2nd edn. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health, vol. 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Metadata
Title
Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort
Authors
Quannetta T. Edwards
Arthur X. Li
Malcolm C. Pike
Laurence N. Kolonel
Giske Ursin
Brian E. Henderson
Roberta McKean-Cowdin
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0049-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine