Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Esophagus 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Esophageal Cancer | Review Article

Review of clinical results of charged-particle therapy for esophageal cancer

Author: Takashi Ono

Published in: Esophagus | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is one of the common causes of cancer-related death. The treatment for esophageal cancer, particularly unresectable cases, is a difficult problem. Reports about charged-particle therapy including proton beam therapy and carbon-ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer have increased. The objective of this study was to review the clinical results of charged-particle therapy for esophageal cancer. Charged-particle therapy was used with an expectation of increasing overall survival with reducing toxicities because charged-particle therapy can reduce the irradiated dose for normal tissues around the target tumor due to its characteristics, hence the name Bragg peak. Proton beam therapy showed a superior distribution of irradiation dose over X-ray therapy including intensity-modulated radiotherapy in silico, but clinical results were not the same. Some reports suggested that proton beam therapy may reduce acute and late toxicities, particularly in the heart and lung, during and after treatment, although it cannot lead to a higher overall survival than that in X-ray therapy. On the other hand, there are a few reports about carbon-ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The special feature of carbon-ion radiotherapy is that hypofractionated radiotherapy is possible as compared to that in X-ray therapy or proton beam therapy. However, the true clinical impact of proton beam therapy or carbon-ion radiotherapy remains unclear because there are no prospective clinical trials comparing charged-particle therapy to X-ray therapy. In view of charged-particle therapy may become one of the treatment choices for esophageal cancer, further studies are needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.PubMedCrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Short MW, Burgers KG, Fry VT. Esophageal cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2017;95(1):22–8.PubMed Short MW, Burgers KG, Fry VT. Esophageal cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2017;95(1):22–8.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):681–92.PubMedCrossRef Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):681–92.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):68–74.PubMedCrossRef Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):68–74.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1623–7.PubMedCrossRef Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1623–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ishikura S, Nihei K, Ohtsu A, et al. Long-term toxicity after definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(14):2697–702.PubMedCrossRef Ishikura S, Nihei K, Ohtsu A, et al. Long-term toxicity after definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(14):2697–702.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Endo M, Robert R. Wilson (1914–2000): the first scientist to propose charged particle therapy-use of particle beam for cancer treatment. Radiol Phys Technol. 2018;11(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRef Endo M, Robert R. Wilson (1914–2000): the first scientist to propose charged particle therapy-use of particle beam for cancer treatment. Radiol Phys Technol. 2018;11(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Schulz-Ertner D, Tsujii H. Particle radiation therapy using proton and heavier ion beams. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(8):953–64.PubMedCrossRef Schulz-Ertner D, Tsujii H. Particle radiation therapy using proton and heavier ion beams. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(8):953–64.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Castro JR, Chen GT, Pitluck S, et al. Helium charged-particle radiotherapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus, stomach, and biliary tract. Am J Clin Oncol. 1983;6(6):629–37.PubMedCrossRef Castro JR, Chen GT, Pitluck S, et al. Helium charged-particle radiotherapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus, stomach, and biliary tract. Am J Clin Oncol. 1983;6(6):629–37.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Linstadt DE, Castro JR, Phillips TL. Neon ion radiotherapy: results of the phase I/II clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;20(4):761–9.PubMedCrossRef Linstadt DE, Castro JR, Phillips TL. Neon ion radiotherapy: results of the phase I/II clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;20(4):761–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Walenta S, Mueller-Klieser W. Differential superiority of heavy charged-particle irradiation to X-rays: studies on biological effectiveness and side effect mechanisms in multicellular tumor and normal tissue models. Front Oncol. 2016;6:30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Walenta S, Mueller-Klieser W. Differential superiority of heavy charged-particle irradiation to X-rays: studies on biological effectiveness and side effect mechanisms in multicellular tumor and normal tissue models. Front Oncol. 2016;6:30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Frandsen J, Boothe D, Gaffney DK, et al. Increased risk of death due to heart disease after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6(5):516–23.PubMedPubMedCentral Frandsen J, Boothe D, Gaffney DK, et al. Increased risk of death due to heart disease after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6(5):516–23.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Asakura H, Hashimoto T, Zenda S, et al. Analysis of dose-volume histogram parameters for radiation pneumonitis after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95(2):240–4.PubMedCrossRef Asakura H, Hashimoto T, Zenda S, et al. Analysis of dose-volume histogram parameters for radiation pneumonitis after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95(2):240–4.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cui Z, Tian Y, He B, et al. Associated factors of radiation pneumonitis induced by precise radiotherapy in 186 elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(9):16646–51.PubMedPubMedCentral Cui Z, Tian Y, He B, et al. Associated factors of radiation pneumonitis induced by precise radiotherapy in 186 elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(9):16646–51.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Tanabe S, Myojin M, Shimizu S, et al. Dose-volume analysis for respiratory toxicity in intrathoracic esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy using extended fields. J Radiat Res. 2013;54(6):1085–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tanabe S, Myojin M, Shimizu S, et al. Dose-volume analysis for respiratory toxicity in intrathoracic esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy using extended fields. J Radiat Res. 2013;54(6):1085–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Fujiwara Y, Nomura M, et al. Predictive factors for pericardial effusion identified by heart dose-volume histogram analysis in oesophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1046):20140168.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hayashi K, Fujiwara Y, Nomura M, et al. Predictive factors for pericardial effusion identified by heart dose-volume histogram analysis in oesophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1046):20140168.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wei X, Liu HH, Tucker SL, et al. Risk factors for pericardial effusion in inoperable esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(3):707–14.PubMedCrossRef Wei X, Liu HH, Tucker SL, et al. Risk factors for pericardial effusion in inoperable esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(3):707–14.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Makishima H, Ishikawa H, Terunuma T, et al. Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose-volume histogram analysis. J Radiat Res. 2015;56(3):568–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Makishima H, Ishikawa H, Terunuma T, et al. Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose-volume histogram analysis. J Radiat Res. 2015;56(3):568–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hirano Y, Onozawa M, Hojo H, et al. Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and photon radiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hirano Y, Onozawa M, Hojo H, et al. Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and photon radiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shiraishi Y, Xu C, Yang J, et al. Dosimetric comparison to the heart and cardiac substructure in a large cohort of esophageal cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017;125(1):48–544.PubMedCrossRef Shiraishi Y, Xu C, Yang J, et al. Dosimetric comparison to the heart and cardiac substructure in a large cohort of esophageal cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017;125(1):48–544.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sugahara S, Tokuuye K, Okumura T, et al. Clinical results of proton beam therapy for cancer of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(1):76–84.PubMedCrossRef Sugahara S, Tokuuye K, Okumura T, et al. Clinical results of proton beam therapy for cancer of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(1):76–84.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ono T, Nakamura T, Azami Y, et al. Clinical results of proton beam therapy for twenty older patients with esophageal cancer. Radiol Oncol. 2015;49(4):371–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ono T, Nakamura T, Azami Y, et al. Clinical results of proton beam therapy for twenty older patients with esophageal cancer. Radiol Oncol. 2015;49(4):371–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lin SH, Komaki R, Liao Z, et al. Proton beam therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(3):e345–351.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lin SH, Komaki R, Liao Z, et al. Proton beam therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(3):e345–351.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ishikawa H, Hashimoto T, Moriwaki T, et al. Proton beam therapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(3):1757–62.PubMed Ishikawa H, Hashimoto T, Moriwaki T, et al. Proton beam therapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(3):1757–62.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Takada A, Nakamura T, Takayama K, et al. Preliminary treatment results of proton beam therapy with chemoradiotherapy for stage I-III esophageal cancer. Cancer Med. 2016;5(3):506–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Takada A, Nakamura T, Takayama K, et al. Preliminary treatment results of proton beam therapy with chemoradiotherapy for stage I-III esophageal cancer. Cancer Med. 2016;5(3):506–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ono T, Wada H, Ishikawa H, et al. Clinical results of proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer: multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(7):pii:E993.CrossRef Ono T, Wada H, Ishikawa H, et al. Clinical results of proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer: multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(7):pii:E993.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Xi M, Xu C, Liao Z, et al. Comparative outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy using proton beam therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective, single-institutional analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(3):667–76.PubMedCrossRef Xi M, Xu C, Liao Z, et al. Comparative outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy using proton beam therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective, single-institutional analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(3):667–76.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kato H, Sato A, Fukuda H, et al. A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39(10):638–43.PubMedCrossRef Kato H, Sato A, Fukuda H, et al. A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39(10):638–43.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, et al. Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(3):684–90.PubMedCrossRef Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, et al. Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(3):684–90.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ariga H, Nemoto K, Miyazaki S, et al. Prospective comparison of surgery alone and chemoradiotherapy with selective surgery in resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(2):348–56.PubMedCrossRef Ariga H, Nemoto K, Miyazaki S, et al. Prospective comparison of surgery alone and chemoradiotherapy with selective surgery in resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(2):348–56.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Shinoda M, Ando N, Kato K, et al. Randomized study of low-dose versus standard-dose chemoradiotherapy for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JCOG0303). Cancer Sci. 2015;106(4):407–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shinoda M, Ando N, Kato K, et al. Randomized study of low-dose versus standard-dose chemoradiotherapy for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JCOG0303). Cancer Sci. 2015;106(4):407–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Wang J, Wei C, Tucker SL, et al. Predictors of postoperative complications after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86(5):885–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang J, Wei C, Tucker SL, et al. Predictors of postoperative complications after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86(5):885–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Fang P, Shiraishi Y, Verma V, et al. Lymphocyte-sparing effect of proton therapy in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation. Int J Part Ther. 2018;4(3):23–322.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fang P, Shiraishi Y, Verma V, et al. Lymphocyte-sparing effect of proton therapy in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation. Int J Part Ther. 2018;4(3):23–322.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Routman DM, Garant A, Lester SC, et al. A comparison of grade 4 lymphopenia with proton versus photon radiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;4(1):63–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Routman DM, Garant A, Lester SC, et al. A comparison of grade 4 lymphopenia with proton versus photon radiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;4(1):63–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Warren S, Hurt CN, Crosby T, et al. Potential of proton therapy to reduce acute hematologic toxicity in concurrent chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(3):729–37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Warren S, Hurt CN, Crosby T, et al. Potential of proton therapy to reduce acute hematologic toxicity in concurrent chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(3):729–37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Shiraishi Y, Fang P, Xu C, et al. Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: A propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128(1):154–60.PubMedCrossRef Shiraishi Y, Fang P, Xu C, et al. Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: A propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128(1):154–60.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Hatogai K, Yano T, Kojima T, et al. Local efficacy and survival outcome of salvage endoscopic therapy for local recurrent lesions after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hatogai K, Yano T, Kojima T, et al. Local efficacy and survival outcome of salvage endoscopic therapy for local recurrent lesions after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Kumagai K, Mariosa D, Tsai JA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the significance of salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(7):734–9.PubMedCrossRef Kumagai K, Mariosa D, Tsai JA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the significance of salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(7):734–9.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, et al. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1167–74.PubMedCrossRef Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, et al. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1167–74.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Song T, Liang X, Fang M, et al. High-dose versus conventional-dose irradiation in cisplatin-based definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(10):1157–69.PubMedCrossRef Song T, Liang X, Fang M, et al. High-dose versus conventional-dose irradiation in cisplatin-based definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(10):1157–69.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Chen Y, Zhu HP, Wang T, et al. What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(51):89095–107.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen Y, Zhu HP, Wang T, et al. What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(51):89095–107.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Luo HS, Huang HC, Lin LX. Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):178.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Luo HS, Huang HC, Lin LX. Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):178.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Akutsu Y, Yasuda S, Nagata M, et al. A phase I/II clinical trial of preoperative short-course carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105(8):750–5.PubMedCrossRef Akutsu Y, Yasuda S, Nagata M, et al. A phase I/II clinical trial of preoperative short-course carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105(8):750–5.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Isozaki Y, Yasuda S, Akutsu Y, et al. Salvage Carbon-ion radiotherapy for isolated lymph node recurrence following curative resection of esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(11):6453–8.PubMedCrossRef Isozaki Y, Yasuda S, Akutsu Y, et al. Salvage Carbon-ion radiotherapy for isolated lymph node recurrence following curative resection of esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(11):6453–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Review of clinical results of charged-particle therapy for esophageal cancer
Author
Takashi Ono
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Esophagus / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Electronic ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00759-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Esophagus 1/2021 Go to the issue