Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Review

What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature

Authors: A. Gaitanidis, C. Simopoulos, M. Pitiakoudis

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS), but in several countries it has still not been widely adopted. LCS training is associated with several challenges, such as patient safety concerns and a steep learning curve. Current evidence may facilitate designing of efficient training curricula to overcome these challenges. Basic training with virtual reality simulators has witnessed meteoric advances and may be essential during the early parts of the learning curve. Cadaveric and animal model training still constitutes an indispensable training tool, due to a higher degree of difficulty and greater resemblance to real operative conditions. In addition, recent evidence favors the use of novel training paradigms, such as proficiency-based training, case selection and modular training. This review summarizes the recent advances in LCS training and provides the evidence for designing an efficient training curriculum to overcome the challenges of LCS training.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
29.
go back to reference Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJC, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21:829–840. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3348-0 PubMedCrossRef Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJC, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21:829–840. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-013-3348-0 PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Willaert W, Van De Putte D, Van Renterghem K, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Pattyn P (2013) Training models in laparoscopy: a systematic review comparing their effectiveness in learning surgical skills. Acta Chir Belg 113:77–95PubMed Willaert W, Van De Putte D, Van Renterghem K, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Pattyn P (2013) Training models in laparoscopy: a systematic review comparing their effectiveness in learning surgical skills. Acta Chir Belg 113:77–95PubMed
49.
go back to reference Bridges M, Diamond DL (1999) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32PubMedCrossRef Bridges M, Diamond DL (1999) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Neary PC, Boyle E, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Keane FBV, Gallagher AG (2008) Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:2301–2309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9900-5 PubMedCrossRef Neary PC, Boyle E, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Keane FBV, Gallagher AG (2008) Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:2301–2309. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-008-9900-5 PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Pattana-arun J, Udomsawaengsup S, Sahakitrungruang C, Tansatit T, Tantiphlachiva K, Rojanasakul A (2005) The new laparoscopic proctocolectomy training (in soft cadaver). J Med Assoc Thai 88(Suppl 4):S65–S569PubMed Pattana-arun J, Udomsawaengsup S, Sahakitrungruang C, Tansatit T, Tantiphlachiva K, Rojanasakul A (2005) The new laparoscopic proctocolectomy training (in soft cadaver). J Med Assoc Thai 88(Suppl 4):S65–S569PubMed
66.
go back to reference Blaschko SD, Brooks HM, Dhuy SM, Charest-Shell C, Clayman RV, McDougall EM (2007) Coordinated multiple cadaver use for minimally invasive surgical training. JSLS 11:403–407PubMedPubMedCentral Blaschko SD, Brooks HM, Dhuy SM, Charest-Shell C, Clayman RV, McDougall EM (2007) Coordinated multiple cadaver use for minimally invasive surgical training. JSLS 11:403–407PubMedPubMedCentral
97.
go back to reference Ramshaw BJ, Young D, Garcha I et al (2001) The role of multimedia interactive programs in training for laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 15:21–27PubMedCrossRef Ramshaw BJ, Young D, Garcha I et al (2001) The role of multimedia interactive programs in training for laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 15:21–27PubMedCrossRef
98.
Metadata
Title
What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature
Authors
A. Gaitanidis
C. Simopoulos
M. Pitiakoudis
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2018 Go to the issue