Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2013

01-08-2013

Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees

Authors: Hugh Mackenzie, Danilo Miskovic, Melody Ni, Amjad Parvaiz, Austin G. Acheson, John T. Jenkins, John Griffith, Mark G. Coleman, George B. Hanna

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The self-taught learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) is between 100 and 150 cases. Supervised training has been shown to shorten the proficiency gain curve of senior specialist surgeons. Little is known about the learning curve of LCS trainees undergoing mentored training. The aim of this study was to analyze the proficiency gain curve and clinical outcomes of English surgical trainees during laparoscopic colorectal surgery fellowships.

Methods

In 2010 the educational, Web-based platform from the National Training Program in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England was newly available to surgical trainees undertaking a laparoscopic colorectal fellowship. These fellows were asked to submit clinical outcomes, including patient demographics and case specifications. In addition, self-perceived performance was evaluated using a validated task-specific self-assessment form [global assessment scale (GAS) range 1–6]. Proficiency gain curves and learning rates were evaluated using risk-adjusted (RA) cumulative sum (CUSUM) curves.

Results

Of 654 cases 608 were included for analysis. The clinical outcomes included 9.2 % conversions, 16.9 % complications, 4 % reoperations, 2.6 % readmissions and a 0.8 % in-hospital mortality rate. RA CUSUM curves for complications and reoperation do not show a learning effect. However, the RA CUSUM curve for conversion has an inflection point at 24 cases. The GAS CUSUM curves for ‘setup’ and ‘exposure’ have inflection points at case 15 and case 29 respectively. The curves for ‘mobilization of colon,’ ‘vascular pedicle’ and ‘anastomosis’ plateau towards the end of the training period. ‘Flexure’ and ‘mesorectum’ do not of reach a plateau by case 40.

Conclusions

Supervised fellowships provide training in LCS without compromising patient safety. Forty cases are required for the fellows to feel confident to perform the majority of tasks except dissection of the mesorectum and flexure, which will require further training.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis PP, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55(12):1300–1310PubMedCrossRef Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis PP, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55(12):1300–1310PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dinçler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46(10):1371–1378PubMedCrossRef Dinçler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46(10):1371–1378PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252(6):943–951PubMedCrossRef Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252(6):943–951PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stein S, Stulberg J, Champagne B (2012) Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing? Surg Endosc 26(2):488–492PubMedCrossRef Stein S, Stulberg J, Champagne B (2012) Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing? Surg Endosc 26(2):488–492PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R (2011) The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: a new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis 13(6):614–616PubMedCrossRef Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R (2011) The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: a new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis 13(6):614–616PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wyles SM, Miskovic D, Ni M, Kennedy RH, Hanna GB, Coleman MG (2012) ‘Trainee’ evaluation of the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14(6):352–357CrossRef Wyles SM, Miskovic D, Ni M, Kennedy RH, Hanna GB, Coleman MG (2012) ‘Trainee’ evaluation of the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14(6):352–357CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2011) Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 25(4):1136–1142PubMedCrossRef Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2011) Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 25(4):1136–1142PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Parvaiz A, Hanna GB (2012) Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level. Surg Endosc 26(3):796–803PubMedCrossRef Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Parvaiz A, Hanna GB (2012) Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level. Surg Endosc 26(3):796–803PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): CD003145 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): CD003145
12.
go back to reference Zhou X, Obuchowski N, McClish D (2002) Statistical methods in clinical medicine. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Zhou X, Obuchowski N, McClish D (2002) Statistical methods in clinical medicine. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Maeda T, Tan KY, Konishi F, Tsujinaka S, Mizokami K, Sasaki J, Kawamura YJ (2009) Trainee surgeons do not cause more conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised. World J Surg 33(11):2439–2443PubMedCrossRef Maeda T, Tan KY, Konishi F, Tsujinaka S, Mizokami K, Sasaki J, Kawamura YJ (2009) Trainee surgeons do not cause more conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised. World J Surg 33(11):2439–2443PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kroeze SG, Mayer EK, Chopra S, Aggarwal R, Darzi A, Patel A (2009) Assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills of urology residents: a pan-European study. Eur Urol 56(5):865–872PubMedCrossRef Kroeze SG, Mayer EK, Chopra S, Aggarwal R, Darzi A, Patel A (2009) Assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills of urology residents: a pan-European study. Eur Urol 56(5):865–872PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brown DC, Miskovic D, Tang B, Hanna GB (2011) Impact of established skills in open surgery on the proficiency gain process for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 24(6):1420–1426CrossRef Brown DC, Miskovic D, Tang B, Hanna GB (2011) Impact of established skills in open surgery on the proficiency gain process for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 24(6):1420–1426CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hunt D (2003) The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. J Intellectual Capital 4(1):100–113CrossRef Hunt D (2003) The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. J Intellectual Capital 4(1):100–113CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nadel FM, Lavelle JM, Fein JA, Giardino AP, Decker JM, Durbin DR (2000) Assessing pediatric senior residents’ training in resuscitation: fund of knowledge, technical skills, and perception of confidence. Pediatr Emerg Care 16(2):73–76PubMedCrossRef Nadel FM, Lavelle JM, Fein JA, Giardino AP, Decker JM, Durbin DR (2000) Assessing pediatric senior residents’ training in resuscitation: fund of knowledge, technical skills, and perception of confidence. Pediatr Emerg Care 16(2):73–76PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ivancic K, Hesketh B (2000) Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence. Ergonomics 43(12):1966–1984PubMedCrossRef Ivancic K, Hesketh B (2000) Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence. Ergonomics 43(12):1966–1984PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees
Authors
Hugh Mackenzie
Danilo Miskovic
Melody Ni
Amjad Parvaiz
Austin G. Acheson
John T. Jenkins
John Griffith
Mark G. Coleman
George B. Hanna
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2806-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2013 Go to the issue