Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2016

01-07-2016

A multi-modal approach to training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery accelerates proficiency gain

Authors: John T. Jenkins, Andrew Currie, Stefano Sala, Robin H. Kennedy

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

How to efficiently train and transfer skills in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is unclear. Errors are rarely avoidable during learning but may incur patient morbidity. Multi-modality training with a modular operative approach provides proficiency-based structured task-specific training in a sequential manner, fragmenting complex laparoscopic colorectal procedures by difficulty allowing more than one trainee to gain experience irrespective of prior experience. This study assessed multi-modality training and its effect on proficiency gain in laparoscopic colorectal fellows.

Methods

A prospective study of 750 consecutive laparoscopic colon and rectal resection training cases assessing proficiency gain using a modified direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) (behaviors-assessment) and weighted global modular attainment score (GMAS) (maneuvers-assessment) was carried out. Two mentors delivered training in a standardized format from 2008. Consequential intra-operative errors (requiring a corrective maneuver to permit further progression of the operation) were recorded. Eight Laparoscopic Fellows were assessed in six-month periods over 4 years. Primary outcome was proficiency gain measured by cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis with boot-strapping comparing weighted GMAS and modified DOPS assessment. Morbidity (Clavien–Dindo classification), and consequential errors were submitted to similar analysis to assess significant variations during the training period.

Results

Fellows were trained on over 100 laparoscopic colorectal resections in a six Fellowship month period. Proficiency gain was identifiable in the DOPS and GMAS with 32 (99 % CI 25–37) and 39 (99 % CI 32–44) cases, respectively. Two- versus single-mentor training improved proficiency gain 35 (99 % CI 30–43) versus 55 (99 % CI 50–60). Overall consequential error rate and major morbidity rate (CD III–IV) were stable over time at 25 and 8.7 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Multi-modality training with modular operative training and technique standardization shortens the time to proficiency gain with low morbidity accepting an intra-operative consequential error rate of 25 %.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300–1310CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300–1310CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252:943–951CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252:943–951CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Heniford BT (2009) The formula for a successful laparoscopic skills curriculum. Arch Surg 144:77–82 (discussion 82) CrossRefPubMed Stefanidis D, Heniford BT (2009) The formula for a successful laparoscopic skills curriculum. Arch Surg 144:77–82 (discussion 82) CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2006) Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 355:2695–2696CrossRefPubMed Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2006) Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 355:2695–2696CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Buchanan GN, Malik A, Parvaiz A, Sheffield JP, Kennedy RH (2008) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:893–902CrossRefPubMed Buchanan GN, Malik A, Parvaiz A, Sheffield JP, Kennedy RH (2008) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:893–902CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R (2006) Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 244:400–409PubMedPubMedCentral Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R (2006) Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 244:400–409PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, De Ridder D, Miserez M (2013) The optimal frequency of endoscopic skill labs for training and skill retention on suturing: a randomized controlled trial. J Surgl Educ 70:384–393CrossRef De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, De Ridder D, Miserez M (2013) The optimal frequency of endoscopic skill labs for training and skill retention on suturing: a randomized controlled trial. J Surgl Educ 70:384–393CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21:829–840CrossRefPubMed Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21:829–840CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Tanimura S, Takemura M, Osugi H (2008) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for neoplasm. A large series by a single surgeon. Surg Endosc 22:1452–1458CrossRefPubMed Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Tanimura S, Takemura M, Osugi H (2008) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for neoplasm. A large series by a single surgeon. Surg Endosc 22:1452–1458CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kayano H, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Tanigawa N (2011) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:2972–2979CrossRefPubMed Kayano H, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Tanigawa N (2011) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:2972–2979CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222CrossRefPubMed Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Maitra RK, Acheson AG, Gornall C, Scholefield JH, Williams JP, Maxwell-Armstrong CA (2014) Results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery from a national training center. Asian J Surg 37:1–7CrossRefPubMed Maitra RK, Acheson AG, Gornall C, Scholefield JH, Williams JP, Maxwell-Armstrong CA (2014) Results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery from a national training center. Asian J Surg 37:1–7CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Maeda T, Tan KY, Konishi F, Tsujinaka S, Mizokami K, Sasaki J, Kawamura YJ (2009) Trainee surgeons do not cause more conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised. World J Surg 33:2439–2443CrossRefPubMed Maeda T, Tan KY, Konishi F, Tsujinaka S, Mizokami K, Sasaki J, Kawamura YJ (2009) Trainee surgeons do not cause more conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised. World J Surg 33:2439–2443CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, Rattner DW (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:238–243CrossRefPubMed Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, Rattner DW (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:238–243CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bouchard A, Martel G, Sabri E, Schlachta CM, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Boushey RP (2009) Does experience with laparoscopic colorectal surgery influence intraoperative outcomes? Surg Endosc 23:862–868CrossRefPubMed Bouchard A, Martel G, Sabri E, Schlachta CM, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Boushey RP (2009) Does experience with laparoscopic colorectal surgery influence intraoperative outcomes? Surg Endosc 23:862–868CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R, National Training Programme L (2011) The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: a new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis 13:614–616CrossRefPubMed Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R, National Training Programme L (2011) The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: a new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis 13:614–616CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2011) Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 25:1136–1142CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2011) Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 25:1136–1142CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Ni M, Parvaiz A, Acheson AG, Jenkins JT, Griffith J, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2013) Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 27(8):2704–2711CrossRefPubMed Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Ni M, Parvaiz A, Acheson AG, Jenkins JT, Griffith J, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2013) Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 27(8):2704–2711CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Offodile AC 2nd, Feingold DL, Nasar A, Whelan RL, Arnell TD (2010) High incidence of technical errors involving the EEA circular stapler: a single institution experience. J Am Coll Surg 210:331–335CrossRefPubMed Offodile AC 2nd, Feingold DL, Nasar A, Whelan RL, Arnell TD (2010) High incidence of technical errors involving the EEA circular stapler: a single institution experience. J Am Coll Surg 210:331–335CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A multi-modal approach to training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery accelerates proficiency gain
Authors
John T. Jenkins
Andrew Currie
Stefano Sala
Robin H. Kennedy
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4591-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2016 Go to the issue