Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gastric Cancer 3/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

International comparison of the German evidence-based S3-guidelines on the diagnosis and multimodal treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus

Authors: Markus Moehler, Christoph T. H. Baltin, Matthias Ebert, Wolfgang Fischbach, Ines Gockel, Lars Grenacher, Arnulf H. Hölscher, Florian Lordick, Peter Malfertheiner, Helmut Messmann, Hans-Joachim Meyer, Anne Palmqvist, Christoph Röcken, Christoph Schuhmacher, Michael Stahl, Martin Stuschke, Michael Vieth, Christian Wittekind, Dorothea Wagner, Stefan P. Mönig

Published in: Gastric Cancer | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Clinical guidelines are essential in implementing and maintaining nationwide stage-specific diagnostic and therapeutic standards. In 2011, the first German expert consensus guideline defined the evidence for diagnosis and treatment of early and locally advanced esophagogastric cancers. Here, we compare this guideline with other national guidelines as well as current literature.

Methods

The German S3-guideline used an approved development process with de novo literature research, international guideline adaptation, or good clinical practice. Other recent evidence-based national guidelines and current references were compared with German recommendations.

Results

In the German S3 and other Western guidelines, adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) are classified according to formerly defined AEG I–III subgroups due to the high surgical impact. To stage local disease, computed tomography of the chest and abdomen and endosonography are reinforced. In contrast, laparoscopy is optional for staging. Mucosal cancers (T1a) should be endoscopically resected “en-bloc” to allow complete histological evaluation of lateral and basal margins. For locally advanced cancers of the stomach or esophagogastric junction (≥T3N+), preferred treatment is preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative radiochemotherapy is an evidence-based alternative for large AEG type I–II tumors (≥T3N+). Additionally, some experts recommend treating T2 tumors with a similar approach, mainly because pretherapeutic staging is often considered to be unreliable.

Conclusions

The German S3 guideline represents an up-to-date European position with regard to diagnosis, staging, and treatment recommendations for patients with locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. Effects of perioperative chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy are still to be investigated for adenocarcinoma of the cardia and the lower esophagus.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ajani JA, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9(8):830-87.PubMed Ajani JA, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9(8):830-87.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Okines A, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 5):v50–4.PubMedCrossRef Okines A, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 5):v50–4.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, et al. The diagnosis and management of gastric cancer: expert discussion and recommendations from the 12th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2010. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(Suppl 5):v1–9. Van Cutsem E, et al. The diagnosis and management of gastric cancer: expert discussion and recommendations from the 12th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2010. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(Suppl 5):v1–9.
4.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):113–23. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):113–23.
5.
go back to reference Popiela T. Polish Gastric Cancer Study Project; success or failure? Nowotwory. 2011;61(6):91e–3e. Popiela T. Polish Gastric Cancer Study Project; success or failure? Nowotwory. 2011;61(6):91e–3e.
6.
go back to reference NCCN Guidelines®: clinical practice guidelines in oncology: esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers V2.2013. http://nccn.org. NCCN Guidelines®: clinical practice guidelines in oncology: esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers V2.2013. http://​nccn.​org.
7.
go back to reference Moehler M, et al. S3-Leitlinie “Magenkarzinom”—Diagnostik und Therapie der Adenokarzinome des Magens und ösophagogastralen Übergangs (AWMF-Regist.-Nr. 032-009-OL). Z Gastroenterol. 2011;49:461–531.PubMedCrossRef Moehler M, et al. S3-Leitlinie “Magenkarzinom”—Diagnostik und Therapie der Adenokarzinome des Magens und ösophagogastralen Übergangs (AWMF-Regist.-Nr. 032-009-OL). Z Gastroenterol. 2011;49:461–531.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Allum WH, et al. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut. 2011;60(11):1449–72.PubMedCrossRef Allum WH, et al. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut. 2011;60(11):1449–72.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ajani JA, et al. Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(5):531–46.PubMed Ajani JA, et al. Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(5):531–46.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Peeters M, et al. Een nationale praktijkrichtlijn voor de aanpak van slokdarm—en maagkanker. Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE), Brussel KCE reports. 2008; p. 75. Peeters M, et al. Een nationale praktijkrichtlijn voor de aanpak van slokdarm—en maagkanker. Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE), Brussel KCE reports. 2008; p. 75.
11.
go back to reference Ychou M, et al. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: standards, options et recommandations 2003 pour la prise en charge des patients atteints d’ adénocarcinomes de l’estomac. 2004. Féderation nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer. Ychou M, et al. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: standards, options et recommandations 2003 pour la prise en charge des patients atteints d’ adénocarcinomes de l’estomac. 2004. Féderation nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer.
13.
go back to reference Yalamarthi S, et al. Missed diagnoses in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers. Endoscopy. 2004;36:874–9.PubMedCrossRef Yalamarthi S, et al. Missed diagnoses in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers. Endoscopy. 2004;36:874–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Voutilainen ME, Juhola MT. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of gastroscopy to detect gastric tumours: clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer missed on endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;17:1345–9.PubMedCrossRef Voutilainen ME, Juhola MT. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of gastroscopy to detect gastric tumours: clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer missed on endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;17:1345–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Amin A, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma missed at endoscopy. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2002;47:681–4.PubMed Amin A, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma missed at endoscopy. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2002;47:681–4.PubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Oldenburg A, Albrecht T. Baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver in tumor patients. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29:488–98.PubMedCrossRef Oldenburg A, Albrecht T. Baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver in tumor patients. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29:488–98.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference van Vliet EP, et al. Ultrasound, computed tomography, or the combination for the detection of supraclavicular lymph nodes in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a comparative study. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:200–6.PubMedCrossRef van Vliet EP, et al. Ultrasound, computed tomography, or the combination for the detection of supraclavicular lymph nodes in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a comparative study. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:200–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Power DG, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound can improve the selection for laparoscopy in patients with localized gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:173–8.PubMedCrossRef Power DG, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound can improve the selection for laparoscopy in patients with localized gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:173–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sano T, Aiko T. New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):97–100.PubMedCrossRef Sano T, Aiko T. New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):97–100.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Soetikno R, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4490–8.PubMedCrossRef Soetikno R, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4490–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sanomura Y, et al. Clinical validity of endoscopic submucosal dissection for submucosal invasive gastric cancer: a single-center study. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(1):97–105. Sanomura Y, et al. Clinical validity of endoscopic submucosal dissection for submucosal invasive gastric cancer: a single-center study. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(1):97–105.
23.
go back to reference Tanaka N, et al. Trends in characteristics of surgically treated early gastric cancer patients after the introduction of gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(2):74–7. Tanaka N, et al. Trends in characteristics of surgically treated early gastric cancer patients after the introduction of gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(2):74–7.
24.
go back to reference Hirasawa T, et al. Lymph node metastasis from undifferentiated-type mucosal gastric cancer satisfying the expanded criteria for endoscopic resection based on routine histological examination. Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(4):267–70. Hirasawa T, et al. Lymph node metastasis from undifferentiated-type mucosal gastric cancer satisfying the expanded criteria for endoscopic resection based on routine histological examination. Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(4):267–70.
25.
go back to reference Lorenzen S, et al. Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2119–27. Lorenzen S, et al. Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2119–27.
26.
go back to reference Shiraishi N, et al. Multivariate prognostic study on large gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:14–8.PubMedCrossRef Shiraishi N, et al. Multivariate prognostic study on large gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:14–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nitti D, et al. Recent advances in conventional and molecular prognostic factors for gastric carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2008;17:467–83, vii. Nitti D, et al. Recent advances in conventional and molecular prognostic factors for gastric carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2008;17:467–83, vii.
29.
go back to reference Degiuli M, et al. Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1727–32.PubMedCentralPubMed Degiuli M, et al. Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1727–32.PubMedCentralPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bonenkamp JJ, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(12):908–14.PubMedCrossRef Bonenkamp JJ, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(12):908–14.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, et al. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(9–10):1522–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, et al. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(9–10):1522–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hartgrink HH, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2069–77.PubMedCrossRef Hartgrink HH, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2069–77.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ. Status of extended lymph node dissection: locoregional control is the only way to survive gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005;90(3):153–65.PubMedCrossRef Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ. Status of extended lymph node dissection: locoregional control is the only way to survive gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005;90(3):153–65.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Songun I, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(5):439–49. Songun I, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(5):439–49.
35.
go back to reference Cunningham D, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Boige V, et al. Final results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative 5-fluorouracil (F)/cisplatin (P) to surgery alone in adenocarcinoma of stomach and lower esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:18S. Boige V, et al. Final results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative 5-fluorouracil (F)/cisplatin (P) to surgery alone in adenocarcinoma of stomach and lower esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:18S.
37.
go back to reference Schuhmacher C, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5210–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schuhmacher C, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5210–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kelsen DP, et al. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3719–25.PubMedCrossRef Kelsen DP, et al. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3719–25.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Allum W, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(30):5062–7.PubMedCrossRef Allum W, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(30):5062–7.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Gebski V, et al. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(3):226–34.PubMedCrossRef Gebski V, et al. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(3):226–34.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Urschel J, Vasan H, Blewett C. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. Am J Surg. 2002;183(2):274–8.PubMedCrossRef Urschel J, Vasan H, Blewett C. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. Am J Surg. 2002;183(2):274–8.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Crehange G, et al. Resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction care: which perioperative treatment? Cancer Radiother. 2008;12(5):365–73.PubMedCrossRef Crehange G, et al. Resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction care: which perioperative treatment? Cancer Radiother. 2008;12(5):365–73.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Okines A, et al. Meta-analysis of the REAL-2 and ML17032 trials: evaluating capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy and infused 5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(9):1529–34.PubMedCrossRef Okines A, et al. Meta-analysis of the REAL-2 and ML17032 trials: evaluating capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy and infused 5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(9):1529–34.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Kelsen D, et al. Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(27):1979–84.PubMedCrossRef Kelsen D, et al. Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(27):1979–84.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Walsh T, et al. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(7):462–7.PubMedCrossRef Walsh T, et al. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(7):462–7.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Urba S, et al. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(2):305–13.PubMed Urba S, et al. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(2):305–13.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Burmeister B, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(9):656–68.CrossRef Burmeister B, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(9):656–68.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Tepper J, et al. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(7):1086–92.PubMedCrossRef Tepper J, et al. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(7):1086–92.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Fiorica F, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Gut. 2004;53(7):925–30. Fiorica F, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Gut. 2004;53(7):925–30.
50.
go back to reference Geh J, et al. Systematic overview of preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy trials in oesophageal cancer: evidence of a radiation and chemotherapy dose response. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78(3):236–44.PubMedCrossRef Geh J, et al. Systematic overview of preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy trials in oesophageal cancer: evidence of a radiation and chemotherapy dose response. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78(3):236–44.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Urschel J, Vasan H. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):538–43. Urschel J, Vasan H. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):538–43.
53.
go back to reference Zhang Z, et al. Randomized clinical trial on the combination of preoperative irradiation and surgery in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of gastric cardia (AGC)–report on 370 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42(5):929–34.PubMedCrossRef Zhang Z, et al. Randomized clinical trial on the combination of preoperative irradiation and surgery in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of gastric cardia (AGC)–report on 370 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42(5):929–34.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Stahl M, et al. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(6):851–6.PubMedCrossRef Stahl M, et al. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(6):851–6.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference van Hagen P, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 366(22):2074–84. van Hagen P, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 366(22):2074–84.
56.
go back to reference Hofheinz RD, et al. Oxaliplatin and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer—an extended phase I MARGIT and AIO trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(1):142–7.PubMedCrossRef Hofheinz RD, et al. Oxaliplatin and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer—an extended phase I MARGIT and AIO trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(1):142–7.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Ho VK, Damhuis RA, Hartgrink HH. Adherence to national guidelines for gastric cancer in the Netherlands: a retrospective population-based audit. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(5):1156–61.PubMedCrossRef Ho VK, Damhuis RA, Hartgrink HH. Adherence to national guidelines for gastric cancer in the Netherlands: a retrospective population-based audit. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(5):1156–61.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Holmebakk T, Frykholm G, Viste A. Introducing national guidelines on perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Norway: a retrospective audit. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36(7):610–6.PubMedCrossRef Holmebakk T, Frykholm G, Viste A. Introducing national guidelines on perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Norway: a retrospective audit. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36(7):610–6.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Dikken JL, et al. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy or by surgery and chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS). BMC Cancer. 2011;11:329.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dikken JL, et al. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy or by surgery and chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS). BMC Cancer. 2011;11:329.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Messager M, et al. The impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with gastric signet ring cell adenocarcinoma: a multicenter comparative study. Ann Surg. 2011;254(5):684–93 (discussion 693). Messager M, et al. The impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with gastric signet ring cell adenocarcinoma: a multicenter comparative study. Ann Surg. 2011;254(5):684–93 (discussion 693).
61.
go back to reference Piessen G, et al. Phase II/III multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating a strategy of primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy versus peri-operative chemotherapy for resectable gastric signet ring cell adenocarcinomas—PRODIGE 19–FFCD1103–ADCI002. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:281.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Piessen G, et al. Phase II/III multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating a strategy of primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy versus peri-operative chemotherapy for resectable gastric signet ring cell adenocarcinomas—PRODIGE 19–FFCD1103–ADCI002. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:281.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Bosset J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(3):161–7.PubMedCrossRef Bosset J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(3):161–7.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Nygaard K, et al. Pre-operative radiotherapy prolongs survival in operable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized, multicenter study of pre-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The second Scandinavian trial in esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 1992;16(6):1104–9.PubMedCrossRef Nygaard K, et al. Pre-operative radiotherapy prolongs survival in operable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized, multicenter study of pre-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The second Scandinavian trial in esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 1992;16(6):1104–9.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Ronellenfitsch U, et al. Perioperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, and lower esophagus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:Cd008107. Ronellenfitsch U, et al. Perioperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, and lower esophagus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:Cd008107.
Metadata
Title
International comparison of the German evidence-based S3-guidelines on the diagnosis and multimodal treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus
Authors
Markus Moehler
Christoph T. H. Baltin
Matthias Ebert
Wolfgang Fischbach
Ines Gockel
Lars Grenacher
Arnulf H. Hölscher
Florian Lordick
Peter Malfertheiner
Helmut Messmann
Hans-Joachim Meyer
Anne Palmqvist
Christoph Röcken
Christoph Schuhmacher
Michael Stahl
Martin Stuschke
Michael Vieth
Christian Wittekind
Dorothea Wagner
Stefan P. Mönig
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Gastric Cancer / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0403-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Gastric Cancer 3/2015 Go to the issue