Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gastric Cancer 3/2015

Open Access 01-07-2015 | Original Article

Health utility of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: findings from GRID, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of regorafenib versus placebo

Authors: Chris D. Poole, Mark P. Connolly, Jane Chang, Craig J. Currie

Published in: Gastric Cancer | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In this analysis we report patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) refractory to imatinib and sunitinib therapy as derived from the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) for progression-free (PF) and progressive disease health status.

Methods

Data were analyzed from a phase III trial conducted at 57 hospitals in 17 countries (trial registration number, NCT01271712). Patients with advanced GIST were randomized (2:1) to receive blinded treatment using oral regorafenib 160 mg daily or placebo, plus best supportive care (BSC) in both groups, for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. EQ-5D-3L was administered on day 1 of each cycle before contact with their physician and before any study-related procedures. The effect of disease progression on the utility of EQ-5D was tested with paired-samples comparison and general linear mixed modeling (GLMM).

Results

One hundred and eighty five patients [93 % of the intention-to-treat (ITT) population] completed 803 EQ-5D questionnaires: 77.7 % in progression-free (PF) state, 6.5 % at progression, 13.9 % following first progression, and 1.9 % after second progression. Mean baseline utility was 0.767 (SD 0.221) with no significant between-group differences for active treatment and BSC. The first post-progression health state was 0.647 (SD 0.343), suggesting significantly impaired health-related quality of life after confirmed disease progression showed a decrease of −0.120 (paired samples t test, p = 0.001). GLMM showed no effect of study treatment or cycle number on utility.

Conclusions

We demonstrate a significant and clinically meaningful difference in health state utility values between PF and progression. Utility values remained stable over successive regorafenib cycles after controlling for disease status and treatment type.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Strickland L, Letson GD, Muro-Cacho CA. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Control. 2001;8(3):252–61.PubMed Strickland L, Letson GD, Muro-Cacho CA. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Control. 2001;8(3):252–61.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nilsson BP, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, Odén A, Dortok A, Gustavsson B, Sablinska K, Kindblom LG. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era. Cancer (Phila). 2005;103:821–9.CrossRef Nilsson BP, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, Odén A, Dortok A, Gustavsson B, Sablinska K, Kindblom LG. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era. Cancer (Phila). 2005;103:821–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Raut CP, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Sundar HM, Trent JC, Wayne JD. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8(suppl 2):S1–41.PubMedCentralPubMed Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Raut CP, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Sundar HM, Trent JC, Wayne JD. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8(suppl 2):S1–41.PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tryggvason G, Gíslason HG, Magnússon MK, Jónasson JG. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Iceland, 1990-2003: the icelandic GIST study, a population-based incidence and pathologic risk stratification study. Int J Cancer. 2005;117(2):289–93.PubMedCrossRef Tryggvason G, Gíslason HG, Magnússon MK, Jónasson JG. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Iceland, 1990-2003: the icelandic GIST study, a population-based incidence and pathologic risk stratification study. Int J Cancer. 2005;117(2):289–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O’Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33(5):459–65.PubMedCrossRef Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O’Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33(5):459–65.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Emile JF, Brahimi S, Coindre JM, et al. Frequencies of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in the MolecGIST prospective population-based study differ from those of advanced GISTs. Med Oncol. 2012;29(3):1765–72.PubMedCrossRef Emile JF, Brahimi S, Coindre JM, et al. Frequencies of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in the MolecGIST prospective population-based study differ from those of advanced GISTs. Med Oncol. 2012;29(3):1765–72.PubMedCrossRef
8.
10.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Lancet. 2013;382(9896):973–83.PubMedCrossRef Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Lancet. 2013;382(9896):973–83.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Meropol NJ, Egleston BL, Buzaglo JS, Benson AB 3rd, Cegala DJ, Diefenbach MA, Fleisher L, Miller SM, Sulmasy DP, Weinfurt KP, CONNECT Study Research Group. Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life. Cancer (Phila). 2008;113(12):3459–66.CrossRef Meropol NJ, Egleston BL, Buzaglo JS, Benson AB 3rd, Cegala DJ, Diefenbach MA, Fleisher L, Miller SM, Sulmasy DP, Weinfurt KP, CONNECT Study Research Group. Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life. Cancer (Phila). 2008;113(12):3459–66.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bond M, Hoyle M, Moxham T, Napier M, Anderson R. Sunitinib for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a critique of the submission from Pfizer. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(suppl 2):69–74.PubMedCrossRef Bond M, Hoyle M, Moxham T, Napier M, Anderson R. Sunitinib for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a critique of the submission from Pfizer. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(suppl 2):69–74.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fallowfield LJ, Fleissig A. The value of progression-free survival to patients with advanced-stage cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;9(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef Fallowfield LJ, Fleissig A. The value of progression-free survival to patients with advanced-stage cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;9(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79.PubMedCentralCrossRef U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79.PubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sorenson C, Drummond M, Kanavos P. Ensuring value for money in health care: the role of health technology assessment in the European Union. Observatory Studies Series No 11. World Health Organization 2008, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. ISBN 978 92 890 7183 3. Sorenson C, Drummond M, Kanavos P. Ensuring value for money in health care: the role of health technology assessment in the European Union. Observatory Studies Series No 11. World Health Organization 2008, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. ISBN 978 92 890 7183 3.
16.
go back to reference Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):344–9.PubMedCrossRef Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):344–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Demetri GD, Reichardt P, Kang Y-K, Blay J-Y, Rutkowski P, Gelderblom H, Casali PG. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):295–302.PubMedCrossRef Demetri GD, Reichardt P, Kang Y-K, Blay J-Y, Rutkowski P, Gelderblom H, Casali PG. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):295–302.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.PubMedCrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Desu MM, Raghavaro D. Sample size methodology. New York: Academic Press; 1990. p. 30–4. Desu MM, Raghavaro D. Sample size methodology. New York: Academic Press; 1990. p. 30–4.
23.
go back to reference Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(6):1523–32.PubMedCrossRef Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(6):1523–32.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM; 2011. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM; 2011.
25.
go back to reference Morita S, Kaptein AA, Tsuburaya A, Kodera Y, Matsui T, Sakamoto J. Assessment and data analysis of health-related quality of life in clinical trials for gastric cancer treatments. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9(4):254–61.PubMedCrossRef Morita S, Kaptein AA, Tsuburaya A, Kodera Y, Matsui T, Sakamoto J. Assessment and data analysis of health-related quality of life in clinical trials for gastric cancer treatments. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9(4):254–61.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health utility of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: findings from GRID, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of regorafenib versus placebo
Authors
Chris D. Poole
Mark P. Connolly
Jane Chang
Craig J. Currie
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Gastric Cancer / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0391-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Gastric Cancer 3/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.