Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 5/2005

01-05-2005 | Concise Article

Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology

Authors: P. I. Vergidis, A. I. Karavasiou, K. Paraschakis, I. A. Bliziotis, M. E. Falagas

Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

In order to expand upon the limited literature estimating the quantity and quality of worldwide research production in the field of microbiology, a bibliometric analysis was conducted for the period 1995–2003 using the PubMed and Journal Citation Reports databases. By searching the “microbiology” category of the Journal Citation Reports database, a total of 74 journals were identified that were also included in PubMed. From these journals, a total of 89,527 articles were identified for analysis, and data on the country in which the research originated was available for 88,456 (98.8%) of them. The individual countries were separated into nine world regions. In terms of research production for the period studied, Western Europe exceeded all other world regions, with the USA ranking second. The mean impact factor was highest for the USA at 3.4, while it was 2.8 for Western Europe and 2.4 for the rest of the world combined. The research productivity per unit of expenditure for research and development was higher for Canada and Western Europe than for the USA. The three regions in which research productivity increased the most were Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ramos JM, Gutierrez F, Masia M, Martin-Hidalgo A (2004) Publication of European Union research on infectious diseases (1991-2001): a bibliometric evaluation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23:180–184 Ramos JM, Gutierrez F, Masia M, Martin-Hidalgo A (2004) Publication of European Union research on infectious diseases (1991-2001): a bibliometric evaluation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23:180–184
2.
go back to reference Institute for Scientific Information (2004) SCI: Science Citation Index-Journal Citation Reports. The Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia Institute for Scientific Information (2004) SCI: Science Citation Index-Journal Citation Reports. The Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia
3.
go back to reference PubMed database (2004) National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed PubMed database (2004) National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​entrez/​query.​fcgi?​db=​PubMed
4.
go back to reference United Nations (2004) United Nations Statistical Yearbook, 48th issue, Part 2. United Nations, New York, pp 33–132 United Nations (2004) United Nations Statistical Yearbook, 48th issue, Part 2. United Nations, New York, pp 33–132
5.
go back to reference World Development Indicators Online (2004) The World Bank, Washington, D.C. http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/ World Development Indicators Online (2004) The World Bank, Washington, D.C. http://​devdata.​worldbank.​org/​dataonline/​
6.
go back to reference Winkmann G, Schweim HG (2000) Medical-bioscientific databanks and the impact factor. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 125:1133–1141 Winkmann G, Schweim HG (2000) Medical-bioscientific databanks and the impact factor. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 125:1133–1141
7.
go back to reference Whitehouse GH (2002) Impact factors: facts and myths. Eur Radiol 12:715–717 Whitehouse GH (2002) Impact factors: facts and myths. Eur Radiol 12:715–717
8.
go back to reference Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314:498–502 Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314:498–502
9.
go back to reference Barnaby DP, Gallagher EJ (1998) Alternative to the Science Citation Index impact factor as an assessment of emergency medicine’s scientific contributions. Ann Emerg Med 31:78–82 Barnaby DP, Gallagher EJ (1998) Alternative to the Science Citation Index impact factor as an assessment of emergency medicine’s scientific contributions. Ann Emerg Med 31:78–82
10.
go back to reference Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122:108–111 Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122:108–111
11.
go back to reference Luukkonen T (1990) Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. Ann Med 22:145–150 Luukkonen T (1990) Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. Ann Med 22:145–150
12.
go back to reference Boldt J, Haisch G, Maleck WH (2000) Changes in the impact factor of anesthesia/critical care journals within the past 10 years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44:842–849 Boldt J, Haisch G, Maleck WH (2000) Changes in the impact factor of anesthesia/critical care journals within the past 10 years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44:842–849
13.
go back to reference Jemec GB (2001) Impact factors of dermatological journals for 1991–2000. BMC Dermatol 1:7 Jemec GB (2001) Impact factors of dermatological journals for 1991–2000. BMC Dermatol 1:7
14.
go back to reference Gensini GF, Conti AA (1999) The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production. Ann Ital Med Int 14:130–133 Gensini GF, Conti AA (1999) The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production. Ann Ital Med Int 14:130–133
Metadata
Title
Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology
Authors
P. I. Vergidis
A. I. Karavasiou
K. Paraschakis
I. A. Bliziotis
M. E. Falagas
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0934-9723
Electronic ISSN: 1435-4373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-005-1306-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 5/2005 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.