Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 11/2020

Open Access 01-11-2020 | Pharmacokinetics | Original Article

Efficacy and safety results from a randomized double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product in subjects with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis

Authors: Gerd Burmester, Edit Drescher, Pawel Hrycaj, David Chien, Zhiying Pan, Stanley Cohen

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background/objectives

ABP 798 is a proposed biosimilar to the originator biologic rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. This comparative clinical study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of ABP 798 versus rituximab reference product (RP) in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

Adults with moderate-to-severe RA with an inadequate response or intolerance to other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs including 1 or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies (n = 311) received ABP 798, US-sourced rituximab RP (rituximab US), or EU-sourced rituximab RP (rituximab EU) (1000 mg, 2 weeks apart). At week 24, ABP 798- or rituximab EU-treated subjects received a second dose of the same treatment, while rituximab US-treated subjects transitioned to receive ABP 798. The key efficacy endpoint was DAS28-CRP change from baseline at week 24. Other efficacy endpoints included DAS28-CRP at other time points; ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 criteria; and hybrid ACR. The rituximab RP groups were pooled for all efficacy endpoints since PK equivalence had been established between rituximab US and rituximab EU.

Results

Clinical equivalence between ABP 798 and rituximab RP was established as the 90% confidence interval for DAS28-CRP change from baseline at week 24 fell within the prespecified equivalence margin (− 0.6, 0.6). Safety and immunogenicity profiles of ABP 798 were comparable across treatment groups and not affected by single transition from RP to ABP 798.

Conclusions

Clinical equivalence in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity was established between ABP 798 and rituximab RP in this comparative clinical trial in patients with moderate-to-severe RA.
Key Points
• ABP 798 provided similar efficacy as rituximab reference product (RP) in patients with moderate-severe rheumatoid arthritis.
• The safety and immunogenicity profiles for ABP 798 were similar to those for the rituximab RP.
• The single transition from rituximab RP to ABP 798 did not show differences in efficacy, safety, or immunogenicity.
Footnotes
1
At the time of this publication, ABP 798 has not been approved by the FDA or other relevant regulatory agency and the indications are yet undetermined. Please consult ABP 798’s later approved label in the relevant country for information regarding the approved uses for ABP 798 in your country.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rituxan (2019) Prescribing information. Genentech Inc, San Francisco Rituxan (2019) Prescribing information. Genentech Inc, San Francisco
2.
go back to reference MabThera (2019) Summary of product characteristics. Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen MabThera (2019) Summary of product characteristics. Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen
3.
go back to reference Weiner GJ (2010) Rituximab: mechanism of action. Semin Hematol 47(2):115–123CrossRef Weiner GJ (2010) Rituximab: mechanism of action. Semin Hematol 47(2):115–123CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Edwards JC, Cambridge G (2001) Sustained improvement in rheumatoid arthritis following a protocol designed to deplete B lymphocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 40:205–211 Edwards JC, Cambridge G (2001) Sustained improvement in rheumatoid arthritis following a protocol designed to deplete B lymphocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 40:205–211
11.
go back to reference Seo N, Huang A, Kuhns S, Sweet H, Cao S, Wikström M, Liu J. Analytical and functional similarity of biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product. Biologicals. 2020. Manuscript accepted. Seo N, Huang A, Kuhns S, Sweet H, Cao S, Wikström M, Liu J. Analytical and functional similarity of biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product. Biologicals. 2020. Manuscript accepted. 
12.
go back to reference Burmester G, Chien D, Chow V et al (2019) A randomized double-blind study comparing pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ABP 798 with rituximab in subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 719(S10):912 Burmester G, Chien D, Chow V et al (2019) A randomized double-blind study comparing pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ABP 798 with rituximab in subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 719(S10):912
13.
go back to reference Burmester G, Chien D, Chow V, Gessner M, Pan J, Cohen S (2020) A randomized double-blind study comparing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of proposed biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product in subjects with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Pharmacol Drug Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.845 Burmester G, Chien D, Chow V, Gessner M, Pan J, Cohen S (2020) A randomized double-blind study comparing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of proposed biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product in subjects with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Pharmacol Drug Development. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cpdd.​845
14.
go back to reference Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO III, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JMW, Hobbs K, Huizinga TWJ, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien TK, Laing T, Mease P, Ménard HA, Moreland LW, Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS, Vencovský J, Wolfe F, Hawker G (2010) 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria. An American College of Rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569–2581CrossRef Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO III, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JMW, Hobbs K, Huizinga TWJ, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien TK, Laing T, Mease P, Ménard HA, Moreland LW, Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS, Vencovský J, Wolfe F, Hawker G (2010) 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria. An American College of Rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569–2581CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JWJ et al (2010) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to targt: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 69:632–637 Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JWJ et al (2010) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to targt: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 69:632–637
16.
go back to reference Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F (1992) The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 35:498–502CrossRef Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F (1992) The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 35:498–502CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Van Riel PLCM, Van Gestel AM, Van De Putte LBA (1996) Development and validation of response criteria in rheumatoid arthritis: steps towards an international consensus on prognostic markers. Brit J Rheumatol 35(suppl 2):4–7CrossRef Van Riel PLCM, Van Gestel AM, Van De Putte LBA (1996) Development and validation of response criteria in rheumatoid arthritis: steps towards an international consensus on prognostic markers. Brit J Rheumatol 35(suppl 2):4–7CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Volkmann E, Agrawal H, Maranian P, Furst DE (2010) Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Med Insights Ther 2:749–760 Volkmann E, Agrawal H, Maranian P, Furst DE (2010) Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Med Insights Ther 2:749–760
19.
go back to reference Vander Cruyssen B, Van Looy S, Wyns B et al (2005) DAS28 best reflects the physician’s clinical judgement of response to infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients: validation of the DAS28 score in patients under infliximab treatment. Arthritis Res Ther. 7:R1063–R1071CrossRef Vander Cruyssen B, Van Looy S, Wyns B et al (2005) DAS28 best reflects the physician’s clinical judgement of response to infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients: validation of the DAS28 score in patients under infliximab treatment. Arthritis Res Ther. 7:R1063–R1071CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A, McMahon AD, Lock P, Vallance R, Porter D, Kincaid W (2004) Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 364:263–269CrossRef Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A, McMahon AD, Lock P, Vallance R, Porter D, Kincaid W (2004) Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 364:263–269CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fuchs HA (1993) The use of the disease activity score in the analysis of clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 20:1863–1866PubMed Fuchs HA (1993) The use of the disease activity score in the analysis of clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 20:1863–1866PubMed
22.
go back to reference Fransen J, van Riel PL (2004) Are better endpoints and better design of clinical trials needed? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 18:97–109CrossRef Fransen J, van Riel PL (2004) Are better endpoints and better design of clinical trials needed? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 18:97–109CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Felson DT, LaValley MP (2014) The ACR20 and defining a threshold for response in rheumatic diseases: too much of a good thing. Arthritis Res Ther 16(1):101CrossRef Felson DT, LaValley MP (2014) The ACR20 and defining a threshold for response in rheumatic diseases: too much of a good thing. Arthritis Res Ther 16(1):101CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Emery P, Gabay C, Kraan M, Gomez-Reino J (2007) Evidence-based review of biologic markers as indicators of disease progression and remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 27:793–806CrossRef Emery P, Gabay C, Kraan M, Gomez-Reino J (2007) Evidence-based review of biologic markers as indicators of disease progression and remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 27:793–806CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, Dougados M, Furie RA, Genovese MC, Keystone EC, Loveless JE, Burmester GR, Cravets MW, Hessey EW, Shaw T, Totoritis MC, REFLEX Trial Group (2006) Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum 54:2793–2806CrossRef Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, Dougados M, Furie RA, Genovese MC, Keystone EC, Loveless JE, Burmester GR, Cravets MW, Hessey EW, Shaw T, Totoritis MC, REFLEX Trial Group (2006) Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum 54:2793–2806CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Emery P, Fleischmann R, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, Schechtman J, Szczepanski L, Kavanaugh A, Racewicz AJ, van Vollenhoven RF, Li NF, Agarwal S, Hessey EW, Shaw TM, DANCER Study Group (2006) The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:1390–1400CrossRef Emery P, Fleischmann R, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, Schechtman J, Szczepanski L, Kavanaugh A, Racewicz AJ, van Vollenhoven RF, Li NF, Agarwal S, Hessey EW, Shaw TM, DANCER Study Group (2006) The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:1390–1400CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety results from a randomized double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product in subjects with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis
Authors
Gerd Burmester
Edit Drescher
Pawel Hrycaj
David Chien
Zhiying Pan
Stanley Cohen
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05305-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Clinical Rheumatology 11/2020 Go to the issue