Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2022

01-05-2022 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

Patient-specific estimation of the bone graft volume needed for maxillary sinus floor elevation: a radiographic study using cone-beam computed tomography

Authors: Kuo Feng Hung, Liu Ling Hui, Yiu Yan Leung

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To develop prediction models for estimating the bone-graft volume needed for sinus floor elevation (SFE) based on the augmentation site, elevation height, and sinus width using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods

CBCT scans with a medium-to-large field-of-view with bilateral maxillary sinuses partially/entirely visible, acquired from February 2016 to October 2020, were initially screened. Ten defined regions, above the maxillary first (MM1) and second molar (MM2) sites, in the sinuses of the included CBCTs were semi-automatically segmented, and the volumes of the regions were automatically measured using the ITK-SNAP program. The sinus widths at the height ranging between 8 and 16 mm from the sinus floor were measured at the MM1 to MM2 sites, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to establish prediction models for estimating the bone graft volume needed for SFE at the MM1 and/or MM2 sites with the sinus width and elevation height as predictors.

Results

A total of 133 scans (224 sinuses) were included. Three developed prediction models, composed of the sinus width and elevation height, explained 89–91% of the variation in the bone graft volumes estimated for SFE at the MM1, MM2, and MM1-MM2 sites. The mean absolute deviations and absolute percentage deviations between the measured and predicted volumes ranged from 0.12 to 0.28cm3 and from 9.78 to 10.62%, respectively.

Conclusion

The proposed prediction models may enable more patient-specific estimation of the bone graft volume needed for SFE.
Clinical relevance.
The proposed prediction models could facilitate the preparation of an adequate amount of bone graft material and patient-clinician communication about the cost of bone graft material.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP (2008) A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 35:216–240CrossRef Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP (2008) A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 35:216–240CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Raghoebar GM, Onclin P, Boven GC, Vissink A, Meijer HJA (2019) Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 46:307–318CrossRef Raghoebar GM, Onclin P, Boven GC, Vissink A, Meijer HJA (2019) Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 46:307–318CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stumbras A, Krukis MM, Januzis G, Juodzbalys G (2019) Regenerative bone potential after sinus floor elevation using various bone graft materials: a systematic review. Quintessence Int 50:548–558PubMed Stumbras A, Krukis MM, Januzis G, Juodzbalys G (2019) Regenerative bone potential after sinus floor elevation using various bone graft materials: a systematic review. Quintessence Int 50:548–558PubMed
4.
go back to reference Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM (2018) Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health 18:88CrossRef Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM (2018) Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health 18:88CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Krennmair S, Weinländer M, Malek M, Forstner T, Krennmair G, Stimmelmayr M (2018) Clinical outcome of implants placed in staged maxillary sinus augmentation using bovine bone mineral mixed with autogenous bone at three different ratios: a 5-year prospective follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 33:1351–1361CrossRef Krennmair S, Weinländer M, Malek M, Forstner T, Krennmair G, Stimmelmayr M (2018) Clinical outcome of implants placed in staged maxillary sinus augmentation using bovine bone mineral mixed with autogenous bone at three different ratios: a 5-year prospective follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 33:1351–1361CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shanbhag S, Shanbhag V, Stavropoulos A (2014) Volume changes of maxillary sinus augmentations over time: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:881–892CrossRef Shanbhag S, Shanbhag V, Stavropoulos A (2014) Volume changes of maxillary sinus augmentations over time: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:881–892CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Maier H, Weinländer M, Piehslinger E (2006) Computerized tomography-assisted calculation of sinus augmentation volume. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21:907–913PubMed Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Maier H, Weinländer M, Piehslinger E (2006) Computerized tomography-assisted calculation of sinus augmentation volume. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21:907–913PubMed
8.
go back to reference Buyukkurt MC, Tozoglu S, Yavuz MS, Aras MH (2010) Simulation of sinus floor augmentation with symphysis bone graft using three-dimensional computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:788–792CrossRef Buyukkurt MC, Tozoglu S, Yavuz MS, Aras MH (2010) Simulation of sinus floor augmentation with symphysis bone graft using three-dimensional computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:788–792CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gray CF, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Needham G, Renny NM (2000) Assessment of maxillary sinus volume for the sinus lift operation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 29:154–158CrossRef Gray CF, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Needham G, Renny NM (2000) Assessment of maxillary sinus volume for the sinus lift operation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 29:154–158CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Soejima Y (1998) Measurement of maxillary sinus volume using computerized tomographic images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:811–818PubMed Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Soejima Y (1998) Measurement of maxillary sinus volume using computerized tomographic images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:811–818PubMed
11.
go back to reference Niu L, Wang J, Yu H, Qiu L (2018) New classification of maxillary sinus contours and its relation to sinus floor elevation surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 20:493–500CrossRef Niu L, Wang J, Yu H, Qiu L (2018) New classification of maxillary sinus contours and its relation to sinus floor elevation surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 20:493–500CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Aghazadeh-Attari J, Mobaraki K, Ahmadzadeh J, Mansorian B, Mohebbi I (2018) Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes 11:266CrossRef Aghazadeh-Attari J, Mobaraki K, Ahmadzadeh J, Mansorian B, Mohebbi I (2018) Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes 11:266CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R (2019) The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 48:20190205CrossRef Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R (2019) The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 48:20190205CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128CrossRef Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cruz AD, Peixoto GA, Aguiar MF, Camargo GACG, Homs N (2017) Surgeons’ performance determining the amount of graft material for sinus floor augmentation using tomography. Braz Dent J 28:385–390CrossRef Cruz AD, Peixoto GA, Aguiar MF, Camargo GACG, Homs N (2017) Surgeons’ performance determining the amount of graft material for sinus floor augmentation using tomography. Braz Dent J 28:385–390CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gomes AF, Brasil DM, Silva AIV, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F, Groppo FC (2020) Accuracy of ITK-SNAP software for 3D analysis of a non-regular topography structure. Oral Radiol 36:183–189CrossRef Gomes AF, Brasil DM, Silva AIV, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F, Groppo FC (2020) Accuracy of ITK-SNAP software for 3D analysis of a non-regular topography structure. Oral Radiol 36:183–189CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Aktuna Belgin C, Colak M, Adiguzel O, Akkus Z, Orhan K (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:1493–1499CrossRef Aktuna Belgin C, Colak M, Adiguzel O, Akkus Z, Orhan K (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:1493–1499CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lovasova K, Kachlik D, Rozpravkova M, Matusevska M, Ferkova J, Kluchova D (2018) Three-dimensional CAD/CAM imaging of the maxillary sinus in ageing process. Ann Anat 218:69–82CrossRef Lovasova K, Kachlik D, Rozpravkova M, Matusevska M, Ferkova J, Kluchova D (2018) Three-dimensional CAD/CAM imaging of the maxillary sinus in ageing process. Ann Anat 218:69–82CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Alqahtani S, Alsheraimi A, Alshareef A, Alsaban R, Alqahtani A, Almgran M, Eldesouky M, Al-Omar A (2020) Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions in riyadh, saudi arabia: a cross-sectional study. Cureus 12:e6611 Alqahtani S, Alsheraimi A, Alshareef A, Alsaban R, Alqahtani A, Almgran M, Eldesouky M, Al-Omar A (2020) Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions in riyadh, saudi arabia: a cross-sectional study. Cureus 12:e6611
20.
go back to reference Chen YW, Finkelman M, Papaspirisdakos P, César-Neto JB, Weber HP, de Souza AB (2021) Comparative analysis of dimensional alterations following extraction of maxillary molars using three-dimensional images’ superimposition: a CBCT study. Odontology 109:514–523CrossRef Chen YW, Finkelman M, Papaspirisdakos P, César-Neto JB, Weber HP, de Souza AB (2021) Comparative analysis of dimensional alterations following extraction of maxillary molars using three-dimensional images’ superimposition: a CBCT study. Odontology 109:514–523CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schriber M, Bornstein MM, Suter VGA (2019) Is the pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus following tooth loss a reality? A retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography and a customised software program. Clin Oral Invest 23:1349–1358CrossRef Schriber M, Bornstein MM, Suter VGA (2019) Is the pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus following tooth loss a reality? A retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography and a customised software program. Clin Oral Invest 23:1349–1358CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Arias-Irimia Ó, Barona Dorado C, Gómez Moreno G, Brinkmann JC, Martínez-González JM (2012) Pre-operative measurement of the volume of bone graft in sinus lifts using CompuDent. Clin Oral Implant Res 23:1070–1074CrossRef Arias-Irimia Ó, Barona Dorado C, Gómez Moreno G, Brinkmann JC, Martínez-González JM (2012) Pre-operative measurement of the volume of bone graft in sinus lifts using CompuDent. Clin Oral Implant Res 23:1070–1074CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Luz J, Greutmann D, Wiedemeier D, Rostetter C, Rucker M, Stadlinger B (2018) 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dentistry 4:17CrossRef Luz J, Greutmann D, Wiedemeier D, Rostetter C, Rucker M, Stadlinger B (2018) 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dentistry 4:17CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mazzocco F, Lops D, Gobbato L, Lolato A, Romeo E, del Fabbro M (2014) Three-dimensional volume change of grafted bone in the maxillary sinus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:178–184CrossRef Mazzocco F, Lops D, Gobbato L, Lolato A, Romeo E, del Fabbro M (2014) Three-dimensional volume change of grafted bone in the maxillary sinus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:178–184CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gultekin BA, Cansiz E, Borahan O, Mangano C, Kolerman R, Mijiritsky E, Yalcin S (2016) Evaluation of volumetric changes of augmented maxillary sinus with different bone grafting biomaterials. J Craniofac Surg 27:e144-148CrossRef Gultekin BA, Cansiz E, Borahan O, Mangano C, Kolerman R, Mijiritsky E, Yalcin S (2016) Evaluation of volumetric changes of augmented maxillary sinus with different bone grafting biomaterials. J Craniofac Surg 27:e144-148CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jang HY, Kim HC, Lee SC, Lee JY (2010) Choice of graft material in relation to maxillary sinus width in internal sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1859–1868CrossRef Jang HY, Kim HC, Lee SC, Lee JY (2010) Choice of graft material in relation to maxillary sinus width in internal sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1859–1868CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zhou W, Wang F, Magic M, Zhuang M, Sun J, Wu Y (2021) The effect of anatomy on osteogenesis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic and histological analysis. Clin Oral Investigations 25:5197–5204CrossRef Zhou W, Wang F, Magic M, Zhuang M, Sun J, Wu Y (2021) The effect of anatomy on osteogenesis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic and histological analysis. Clin Oral Investigations 25:5197–5204CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Al-Moraissi EA, Alkhutari AS, Abotaleb B, Altairi NH, Del Fabbro M (2020) Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:107–120CrossRef Al-Moraissi EA, Alkhutari AS, Abotaleb B, Altairi NH, Del Fabbro M (2020) Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:107–120CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Machtei EE, Rozitky D, Zigdon-Giladi H, Horwitz J (2016) Dimensional changes following lateral wall sinus augmentation without concomitant implant placement using a composite bone graft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 31:87–91CrossRef Machtei EE, Rozitky D, Zigdon-Giladi H, Horwitz J (2016) Dimensional changes following lateral wall sinus augmentation without concomitant implant placement using a composite bone graft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 31:87–91CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Shavit E, Shavit I, Pinchasov D, Shavit D, Pinchasov G, Juodzbalys G (2019) The use of tooth derived bone graft materials in sinus augmentation procedures: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 10:e1 Shavit E, Shavit I, Pinchasov D, Shavit D, Pinchasov G, Juodzbalys G (2019) The use of tooth derived bone graft materials in sinus augmentation procedures: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 10:e1
31.
go back to reference Gandhi Y (2020) Endoscopically monitored maxillary sinus augmentation - the chairside approach (Rationale and protocol). J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 10:247–252CrossRef Gandhi Y (2020) Endoscopically monitored maxillary sinus augmentation - the chairside approach (Rationale and protocol). J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 10:247–252CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ueno D, Kurokawa T, Maruo K, Watanabe T, Jayawardena JA (2015) Palatal window osteotomy technique improves maxillary sinus augmentation in previously insufficient augmentation case. Int J Implant Dentistry 1:19CrossRef Ueno D, Kurokawa T, Maruo K, Watanabe T, Jayawardena JA (2015) Palatal window osteotomy technique improves maxillary sinus augmentation in previously insufficient augmentation case. Int J Implant Dentistry 1:19CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Younes R, Nader N, Khoury G (2015). Sinus grafting techniques a step-by-step guide. Springer. p:198 Younes R, Nader N, Khoury G (2015). Sinus grafting techniques a step-by-step guide. Springer. p:198
34.
go back to reference Avila G, Wang HL, Galindo-Moreno P, Misch CE, Bagramian RA, Rudek I, Benavides E, Moreno-Riestra I, Braun T, Neiva R (2010) The influence of the bucco-palatal distance on sinus augmentation outcomes. J Periodontol 81:1041–1050CrossRef Avila G, Wang HL, Galindo-Moreno P, Misch CE, Bagramian RA, Rudek I, Benavides E, Moreno-Riestra I, Braun T, Neiva R (2010) The influence of the bucco-palatal distance on sinus augmentation outcomes. J Periodontol 81:1041–1050CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient-specific estimation of the bone graft volume needed for maxillary sinus floor elevation: a radiographic study using cone-beam computed tomography
Authors
Kuo Feng Hung
Liu Ling Hui
Yiu Yan Leung
Publication date
01-05-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04354-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2022 Go to the issue