Top

Published in:

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Evaluation of accuracy in implant site preparation performed in single- or multi-step drilling procedures

Authors: Nadine Marheineke, Uta Scherer, Martin Rücker, Constantin von See, Björn Rahlf, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Marcus Stoetzer

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 5/2018

Abstract

Objectives

Dental implant failure and insufficient osseointegration are proven results of mechanical and thermal damage during the surgery process. We herein performed a comparative study of a less invasive single-step drilling preparation protocol and a conventional multiple drilling sequence. Accuracy of drilling holes was precisely analyzed and the influence of different levels of expertise of the handlers and additional use of drill template guidance was evaluated.

Material and methods

Six experimental groups, deployed in an osseous study model, were representing template-guided and freehanded drilling actions in a stepwise drilling procedure in comparison to a single-drill protocol. Each experimental condition was studied by the drilling actions of respectively three persons without surgical knowledge as well as three highly experienced oral surgeons. Drilling actions were performed and diameters were recorded with a precision measuring instrument.

Results

Less experienced operators were able to significantly increase the drilling accuracy using a guiding template, especially when multi-step preparations are performed. Improved accuracy without template guidance was observed when experienced operators were executing single-step versus multi-step technique.

Conclusion

Single-step drilling protocols have shown to produce more accurate results than multi-step procedures. The outcome of any protocol can be further improved by use of guiding templates. Operator experience can be a contributing factor.

Clinical relevance

Single-step preparations are less invasive and are promoting osseointegration. Even highly experienced surgeons are achieving higher levels of accuracy by combining this technique with template guidance. Hereby template guidance enables a reduction of hands-on time and side effects during surgery and lead to a more predictable clinical diameter.

Elias CN, Rocha FA, Nascimento AL, Coelho PG (2012) Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 16:169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.010 CrossRefPubMed

Brisman DL (1996) The effect of speed, pressure, and time on bone temperature during the drilling of implant sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11:35–37PubMed

Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Lee HJ, Moss ME, Graser GN (2004) The influence of drill wear on cutting efficiency and heat production during osteotomy preparation for dental implants: a study of drill durability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:335–349PubMed

Davidson SR, James DF (2003) Drilling in bone: modeling heat generation and temperature distribution. J Biomech Eng 125:305–314CrossRefPubMed

Eriksson RA, Adell R (1986) Temperatures during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(1):4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90006-6 CrossRefPubMed

Abouzgia MB, Symington JM (1996) Effect of drill speed on bone temperature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:394–399CrossRefPubMed

Sener BC, Dergin G, Gursoy B, Kelesoglu E, Slih I (2009) Effects of irrigation temperature on heat control in vitro at different drilling depths. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:294–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01643.x CrossRefPubMed

dos Santos PL, Queiroz TP, Margonar R, de Souza Carvalho AC, Betoni W Jr, Rezende RR, dos Santos PH, Garcia IR Jr (2014) Evaluation of bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after implant osteotomy: guided surgery and classic drilling procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(1):51–58. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919 CrossRefPubMed

Mohlhenrich SC, Abouridouane M, Heussen N, Modabber A, Klocke F, Holzle F (2016) Influence of bone density and implant drill diameter on the resulting axial force and temperature development in implant burs and artificial bone: an in vitro study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 20:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-015-0536-z CrossRefPubMed

10.

Fuchsberger A (1988) Damaging temperature during the machining of bone. Unfallchirurgie 14:173–183PubMed

11.

Augustin G, Davila S, Mihoci K, Udiljak T, Vedrina DS, Antabak A (2008) Thermal osteonecrosis and bone drilling parameters revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0427-3 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Iyer S, Weiss C, Mehta A (1997) Effects of drill speed on heat production and the rate and quality of bone formation in dental implant osteotomies. Part II: relationship between drill speed and healing. Int J Prosthodont 10:536–540PubMed

13.

Bettach R, Taschieri S, Boukhris G, Del Fabbro M (2015) Implant survival after preparation of the implant site using a single bur: a case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12082 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gehrke SA, Bettach R, Taschieri S, Boukhris G, Corbella S, Del Fabbro M (2015) Temperature changes in cortical bone after implant site preparation using a single bur versus multiple drilling steps: an in vitro investigation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17:700–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12172 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP (2008) A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 19(2):119–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x CrossRefPubMed

16.

Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T (2010) Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol 81:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090348 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A (2009) Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:234–242PubMed

18.

Bulloch SE, Olsen RG, Bulloch B (2012) Comparison of heat generation between internally guided (cannulated) single drill and traditional sequential drilling with and without a drill guide for dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1456–1460PubMed

19.

Bardyn T, Gedet P, Hallermann W, Buchler P (2009) Quantifying the influence of bone density and thickness on resonance frequency analysis: an in vitro study of biomechanical test materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:1006–1014PubMed

20.

Swami V, Vijayaraghavan V, Swami V (2016) Current trends to measure implant stability. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 16:124–130. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176539 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Scherer U, Stoetzer M, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC, von See C (2015) Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants. Clin Oral Investig 19:1339–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1346-7 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Oftadeh R, Perez-Viloria M, Villa-Camacho JC, Vaziri A, Nazarian A (2015) Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: a review. J Biomech Eng 137(1):010802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029176 CrossRef

23.

Haiat G, Wang HL, Brunski J (2014) Effects of biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface on dental implant stability: from in silico approaches to the patient’s mouth. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:187–213. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-104854 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Kim SK, Lee HN, Choi YC, Heo SJ, Lee CW, Choie MK (2006) Effects of anodized oxidation or turned implants on bone healing after using conventional drilling or trabecular compaction technique: histomorphometric analysis and RFA. Clin Oral Implants Res 17(6):644–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01285.x CrossRefPubMed

25.

Sennerby L (2008) Dental implants: matters of course and controversies. Periodontol 2000(47):9–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00268.x CrossRef

26.

Sennerby L, Meredith N (2008) implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 47:51–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x CrossRef

27.

Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L (2002) Clinical outcome of Branemark system implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:671–677PubMed

28.

Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA (2010) Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01823.x CrossRefPubMed

29.

MacAvelia T, Salahi M, Olsen M, Crookshank M, Schemitsch EH, Ghasempoor A, Janabi-Sharifi F, Zdero R (2012) Biomechanical measurements of surgical drilling force and torque in human versus artificial femurs. J Biomech Eng 134:124503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007953 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Macavelia T, Ghasempoor A, Janabi-Sharifi F (2012) Force and torque modelling of drilling simulation for orthopaedic surgery. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 17(12):1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2012.739163 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Dhore CR, Snel SJ, Jacques SV, Naert IE, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA (2008) In vitro osteogenic potential of bone debris resulting from placement of titanium screw-type implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:606–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01519.x CrossRefPubMed

32.

Beaman FD, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Kransdorf MJ (2006) Bone graft materials and synthetic substitutes. Radiol Clin North Am 44(3):451–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2006.01.001 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Beaman FD, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Menke DM, DeOrio JK (2006) Imaging characteristics of bone graft materials. Radiographics 26(2):373–388. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.262055039 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Gao SS, Zhang YR, Zhu ZL, Yu HY (2012) Micromotions and combined damages at the dental implant/bone interface. Int J Oral Sci 4:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.68 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH (1998) Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 43:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:23.0.CO;2-K CrossRefPubMed

36.

Frisardi G, Barone S, Razionale AV, Paoli A, Frisardi F, Tullio A, Lumbau A, Chessa G (2012) Biomechanics of the press-fit phenomenon in dental implantology: an image-based finite element analysis. Head Face Med 8(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-18 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Alghamdi H, Anand PS, Anil S (2011) Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: a prospective clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(12):e506–e512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Anitua E, Alkhraisat MH, Pinas L, Orive G (2014) Efficacy of biologically guided implant site preparation to obtain adequate primary implant stability. Ann Anat 199:9–15CrossRefPubMed

39.

Coelho PG, Marin C, Teixeira HS, Campos FE, Gomes JB, Guastaldi F, Anchieta RB, Silveira L, Bonfante EA (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of undersized drilling on implant biomechanical stability at early implantation times. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:e69–e75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.008 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Penarrocha M, Garcia B, Marti E, Balaguer J (2006) Pain and inflammation after periapical surgery in 60 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:429–433CrossRefPubMed

41.

Jimbo R, Janal MN, Marin C, Giro G, Tovar N, Coelho PG (2014) The effect of implant diameter on osseointegration utilizing simplified drilling protocols. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(11):1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12268 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Giro G, Tovar N, Marin C, Bonfante EA, Jimbo R, Suzuki M, Janal MN, Coelho PG (2013) The effect of simplifying dental implant drilling sequence on osseointegration: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Biomater 2013:230310–230316. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/230310 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Gehrke SA (2015) Evaluation of the cortical bone reaction around of implants using a single-use final drill: a histologic study. J Craniofac Surg 26:1482–1486. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001788 CrossRefPubMed

44.

Bratu E, Mihali S, Shapira L, Bratu DC, Wang HL (2015) Crestal bone remodeling around implants placed using a short drilling protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 30:435–440. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3526 CrossRefPubMed

45.

Jimbo R, Tovar N, Anchieta RB, Machado LS, Marin C, Teixeira HS, Coelho PG (2014) The combined effects of undersized drilling and implant macrogeometry on bone healing around dental implants: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43:1269–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.017 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Park SY, Shin SY, Yang SM, Kye SB (2010) Effect of implant drill design on the particle size of the bone collected during osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:1007–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.05.009 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Abboud M, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Kucine A, Rugova S, Balanta J, Calvo-Guirado JL (2015) Multistepped drill design for single-stage implant site preparation: experimental study in type 2 bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17(Suppl 2):e472–e485. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12273 CrossRefPubMed

48.

Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE (2009) A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(Suppl 4):73–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01788.x CrossRefPubMed

49.

Allsobrook OF, Leichter J, Holborrow D, Swain M (2011) Descriptive study of the longevity of dental implant surgery drills. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 13:244–254CrossRefPubMed

50.

Chacon GE, Bower DL, Larsen PE, McGlumphy EA, Beck FM (2006) Heat production by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.011 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G (2005) Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 16(4):495–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x CrossRefPubMed

52.

Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, Isidori M (2003) Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18(6):886–893PubMed

53.

Nickenig HJ, Eitner S, Rothamel D, Wichmann M, Zoller JE (2012) Possibilities and limitations of implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates. Int J Comput Dent 15:9–21PubMed

54.

Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N (2003) Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:571–577PubMed

55.

Schnitman PA, Hayashi C, Han RK (2014) Why guided when freehand is easier, quicker, and less costly? J Oral Implantol 40:670–678. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00231 CrossRefPubMed

56.

van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blomback U, Andersson M, Schutyser F, Pettersson A, Wendelhag I (2005) A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7(Suppl 1):S111–S120CrossRefPubMed

57.

D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H (2012) Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14:321–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00275.x CrossRefPubMed

Title: Evaluation of accuracy in implant site preparation performed in single- or multi-step drilling procedures
Authors: Nadine Marheineke
Uta Scherer
Martin Rücker
Constantin von See
Björn Rahlf
Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Marcus Stoetzer
Publication date: 01-06-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2312-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Evaluation of accuracy in implant site preparation performed in single- or multi-step drilling procedures

Abstract

Objectives

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients

Porous zirconia ceramic as an alternative to dentin for in vitro dentin barriers cytotoxicity test

The effectiveness of two types of MADS for OSA therapy

Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years

Therapeutic effect of andiroba oil (Carapa guianensis Aubl.) against oral mucositis: an experimental study in golden Syrian hamsters

Orofacial manifestations in outpatients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa focusing on the vomiting behavior