Published in:
01-12-2015 | Original Article
Three- to nine-year survival estimates and fracture mechanisms of zirconia- and alumina-based restorations using standardized criteria to distinguish the severity of ceramic fractures
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 9/2015
Login to get accessAbstract
Objectives
The aims of this study were set as follows:
1.
To provide verifiable criteria to categorize the ceramic fractures into non-critical (i.e., amenable to polishing) or critical (i.e., in need of replacement)
2.
To establish the corresponding survival rates for alumina and zirconia restorations
3.
To establish the mechanism of fracture using fractography
Materials and methods
Fifty-eight patients restored with 115 alumina-/zirconia-based crowns and 26 zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) were included. Ceramic fractures were classified into four types and further subclassified into “critical” or “non-critical.” Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were calculated for “critical fractures only” and “all fractures.” Intra-oral replicas were taken for fractographic analyses.
Results
Kaplan–Meier survival estimates for “critical fractures only” and “all fractures” were respectively: Alumina single crowns: 90.9 and 68.3 % after 9.5 years (mean 5.71 ± 2.6 years). Zirconia single crowns: 89.4 and 80.9 % after 6.3 years (mean 3.88 ± 1.2 years). Zirconia FDPs: 68.6 % (critical fractures) and 24.6 % (all fractures) after 7.2 and 4.6 years respectively (FDP mean observation time 3.02 ± 1.4 years). No core/framework fractures were detected.
Conclusions
Survival estimates varied significantly depending on whether “all” fractures were considered as failures or only those deemed as “critical”. For all restorations, fractographic analyses of failed veneering ceramics systematically demonstrated heavy occlusal wear at the failure origin. Therefore, the relief of local contact pressures on unsupported ceramic is recommended. Occlusal contacts on mesial or distal ridges should systematically be eliminated.
Clinical relevance
A classification standard for ceramic fractures into four categories with subtypes “critical” and “non-critical” provides a differentiated view of the survival of ceramic restorations.