Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2010

01-08-2010 | Original Article

FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples

Authors: Reinhard Hickel, Arnd Peschke, Martin Tyas, Ivar Mjör, Stephen Bayne, Mathilde Peters, Karl-Anton Hiller, Ross Randall, Guido Vanherle, Siegward D. Heintze

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

In 2007, new clinical criteria were approved by the FDI World Dental Federation and simultaneously published in three dental journals. The criteria were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria) and biological parameters (six criteria). Each criterion can be expressed with five scores, three for acceptable and two for non-acceptable (one for reparable and one for replacement). The criteria have been used in several clinical studies since 2007, and the resulting experience in their application has led to a requirement to modify some of the criteria and scores. The two major alterations involve staining and approximal contacts. As staining of the margins and the surface has different causes, both phenomena do not appear simultaneously. Thus, staining has been differentiated into marginal staining and surface staining. The approximal contact now appears under the name “approximal anatomic form” as the approximal contour is a specific, often non-esthetic issue that cannot be integrated into the criterion “esthetic anatomical form”. In 2008, a web-based training and calibration tool called e-calib (www.​e-calib.​info) was made available. Clinical investigators and other research workers can train and calibrate themselves interactively by assessing clinical cases of posterior restorations which are presented as high-quality pictures. Currently, about 300 clinical cases are included in the database which is regularly updated. Training for eight of the 16 clinical criteria is available in the program: “Surface lustre”; “Staining (surface, margins)”; “Color match and translucency”; Esthetic anatomical form”; “Fracture of material and retention”; “Marginal adaptation”; “Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction”; and “Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)”. Typical clinical cases are presented for each of these eight criteria and their corresponding five scores.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coelho-Souza FH, Piva F, Klein-Junior CA, Demarco FF, Camargo J, Balestrin M, Beskow T (2009) A clinical trial of composite restorations with or without bevel. J Dent Res Abstract No. 3521 Coelho-Souza FH, Piva F, Klein-Junior CA, Demarco FF, Camargo J, Balestrin M, Beskow T (2009) A clinical trial of composite restorations with or without bevel. J Dent Res Abstract No. 3521
2.
go back to reference Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Int Dent J 57:300–302PubMed Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Int Dent J 57:300–302PubMed
3.
go back to reference Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 11:5–33 (Epub 30 Jan 2007)CrossRefPubMed Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 11:5–33 (Epub 30 Jan 2007)CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials (Science Committee Project 2/98—FDI World Dental Federation). J Adhes Dent 9(Supplement 1):121–147PubMed Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials (Science Committee Project 2/98—FDI World Dental Federation). J Adhes Dent 9(Supplement 1):121–147PubMed
5.
go back to reference Knibbs PJ (1997) Methods of clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 24:109–123CrossRefPubMed Knibbs PJ (1997) Methods of clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 24:109–123CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Piva F, Coelho-Souza FH (2009) A deciduous teeth composite restoration clinica trial using two methods. J Dent Res Abstract No. 3241 Piva F, Coelho-Souza FH (2009) A deciduous teeth composite restoration clinica trial using two methods. J Dent Res Abstract No. 3241
7.
go back to reference Schattenberg A, Storck S, Busemann I, Willershausen B, Ernst C-P (2009) Clinical evaluation of a silorane restorative in class II cavities. J Dent Res, 88(Special Issue A):Abstract No. 1007. www.dentalresearch.org Schattenberg A, Storck S, Busemann I, Willershausen B, Ernst C-P (2009) Clinical evaluation of a silorane restorative in class II cavities. J Dent Res, 88(Special Issue A):Abstract No. 1007. www.​dentalresearch.​org
Metadata
Title
FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples
Authors
Reinhard Hickel
Arnd Peschke
Martin Tyas
Ivar Mjör
Stephen Bayne
Mathilde Peters
Karl-Anton Hiller
Ross Randall
Guido Vanherle
Siegward D. Heintze
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2010 Go to the issue