Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Original Article

Experimental evaluation of the fineness of needle forceps: advantages other than minimal access

Authors: Kenta Doden, Noriyuki Inaki, Toshikatsu Tsuji

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Needle forceps are used to limit damage to the abdominal wall in endoscopic surgery; however, few experimental studies have evaluated the fineness and performance of needle forceps. We conducted this study to identify the advantages of needle forceps over conventional 5 mm forceps, focusing on fine grasping and needle control.

Methods

Twenty physicians executed tasks using 5 mm forceps and 2.1 mm small diameter forceps in a laparoscopic experimental setting. First, we timed the execution and recorded the number of drops in a task of grasping and moving grains of rice and red beans. Next, we measured the execution time, looseness of the knot, and the deviation from the stitching point in a suture and ligation task using suture needles with a diameter of 17 or 26 mm.

Results

The needle forceps required a significantly shorter execution time to move the rice grains (37.7 s vs. 45.8 s; p = 0.01) and a significantly higher completion rate (90% vs 20%; p < 0.01). The deviation of the stitching point using the 17 mm needle with needle forceps was significantly smaller than with the 5 mm forceps (0.5 mm vs. 1.0 mm; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Needle forceps are better for procedures requiring fine grasping and enable more accurate small diameter needle control than 5 mm forceps.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, et al. COLOR II study group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.CrossRef Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, et al. COLOR II study group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg. 2015;39:2734–41.CrossRef Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg. 2015;39:2734–41.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258:554–9.CrossRef Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258:554–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, van der Horst S, Haverkamp L, Siersema PD, et al. Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):S1350–6.CrossRef van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, van der Horst S, Haverkamp L, Siersema PD, et al. Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):S1350–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Watanabe Y, Sato M, Ueda S, Abe Y, Horiuchi A, Doi T, et al. Microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy—the first 20 cases: is it an alternative to conventional LC. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:623–5.CrossRef Watanabe Y, Sato M, Ueda S, Abe Y, Horiuchi A, Doi T, et al. Microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy—the first 20 cases: is it an alternative to conventional LC. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:623–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A. Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:171–9.CrossRef Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A. Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:171–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Inaki N. Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy: a review, techniques, and perspective. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8:1–10.CrossRef Inaki N. Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy: a review, techniques, and perspective. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8:1–10.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schmidt J, Sparenberg C, Fraunhofer S, Zirngibl H. Sympathetic nervous system activity during laparoscopic and needlescopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:476–80.CrossRef Schmidt J, Sparenberg C, Fraunhofer S, Zirngibl H. Sympathetic nervous system activity during laparoscopic and needlescopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:476–80.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:458–64.CrossRef Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:458–64.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee AC, Haddad MJ, Hanna GB. Influence of instrument size on endoscopic task performance in pediatric intracorporeal knot tying: smaller instruments are better in infants. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2086–90.CrossRef Lee AC, Haddad MJ, Hanna GB. Influence of instrument size on endoscopic task performance in pediatric intracorporeal knot tying: smaller instruments are better in infants. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2086–90.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;48:452–8.CrossRef Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;48:452–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kondo A, Nishizawa Y, Horikiri Y, Amemori H, Tsukada Y, Sasaki T, et al. A novel device designed to improve the operability of energy devices with foot pedals in endoscopic surgery: the foot-site monitor. Surg Today. 2019;49:965–70.CrossRef Kondo A, Nishizawa Y, Horikiri Y, Amemori H, Tsukada Y, Sasaki T, et al. A novel device designed to improve the operability of energy devices with foot pedals in endoscopic surgery: the foot-site monitor. Surg Today. 2019;49:965–70.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Firme WA, Carvalho GL, Lima DL, Lopes VG, Montandon ID, Santos Filho F, et al. Low-friction minilaparoscopy outperforms regular 5-mm and 3-mm instruments for precise tasks. JSLS. 2015;19(e2015):00067. Firme WA, Carvalho GL, Lima DL, Lopes VG, Montandon ID, Santos Filho F, et al. Low-friction minilaparoscopy outperforms regular 5-mm and 3-mm instruments for precise tasks. JSLS. 2015;19(e2015):00067.
14.
go back to reference Araujo SE, Mendes CR, Carvalho GL, Lyra M. Surgeons’ perceptions of transanal endoscopic microsurgery using minilaparoscopic instruments in a simulator: the thinner the better. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2331–8.CrossRef Araujo SE, Mendes CR, Carvalho GL, Lyra M. Surgeons’ perceptions of transanal endoscopic microsurgery using minilaparoscopic instruments in a simulator: the thinner the better. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2331–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ishiyama Y, Inaki N, Bando H, Yamada T. Assessment of intracorporeal suturing in single-port surgery using an experimental suturing model. Indian J Surg. 2017;79:137–42.CrossRef Ishiyama Y, Inaki N, Bando H, Yamada T. Assessment of intracorporeal suturing in single-port surgery using an experimental suturing model. Indian J Surg. 2017;79:137–42.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tang B, Hou S, Cuschieri SA. Ergonomics of and technologies for single-port laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21:46–54.CrossRef Tang B, Hou S, Cuschieri SA. Ergonomics of and technologies for single-port laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21:46–54.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, Tori M, Ueshima S, Nishida T. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2400–4.CrossRef Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, Tori M, Ueshima S, Nishida T. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2400–4.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Park DJ, Lee JH, Ahn SH, Eng AK, Kim HH. Single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+β lymph node dissection for gastric cancers: report of 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:e214–6.CrossRef Park DJ, Lee JH, Ahn SH, Eng AK, Kim HH. Single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+β lymph node dissection for gastric cancers: report of 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:e214–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kanehira E, Tanida T, Kamei A, Nakagi M, Yoshida T, Touma S. Needlescopic intragastric surgery facilitated by newly developed 2 mm instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:210–4.CrossRef Kanehira E, Tanida T, Kamei A, Nakagi M, Yoshida T, Touma S. Needlescopic intragastric surgery facilitated by newly developed 2 mm instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:210–4.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kamei A, Kanehira E, Nakagi M, Tanida T. Development of scar-less laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP-252) facilitated by new 2 mm instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:314–8.CrossRef Kamei A, Kanehira E, Nakagi M, Tanida T. Development of scar-less laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP-252) facilitated by new 2 mm instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:314–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tagaya N, Kubota K. Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:137–43.CrossRef Tagaya N, Kubota K. Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:137–43.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ko HJ, Chiang XH, Yang SM, Yang MC. Needlescopic-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary anatomical lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: a bridge between multiportal and uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. Surg Today. 2019;49:49–55.CrossRef Ko HJ, Chiang XH, Yang SM, Yang MC. Needlescopic-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary anatomical lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: a bridge between multiportal and uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. Surg Today. 2019;49:49–55.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wada H, Kimura T, Kawabe A, Sato M, Miyaki Y, Tochikubo J, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1898–902.CrossRef Wada H, Kimura T, Kawabe A, Sato M, Miyaki Y, Tochikubo J, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1898–902.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chan YW, Hollinsky C. Needlescopic surgery versus single-port laparoscopy for inguinal hernia. JSLS. 2015;19:e2015.00056.CrossRef Chan YW, Hollinsky C. Needlescopic surgery versus single-port laparoscopy for inguinal hernia. JSLS. 2015;19:e2015.00056.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Kim KH, An CH, Kim JS. Innovative technique of needlescopic grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a comparative study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12857–64.CrossRef Kim SJ, Kim KH, An CH, Kim JS. Innovative technique of needlescopic grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a comparative study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12857–64.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Sturla D, Serati M, et al. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients. Surg Innov. 2013;20:493–501.CrossRef Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Sturla D, Serati M, et al. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients. Surg Innov. 2013;20:493–501.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tagaya N, Kubota K. Experience with endoscopic axillary lymphadenectomy using needlescopic instruments in patients with breast cancer: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:307–9.CrossRef Tagaya N, Kubota K. Experience with endoscopic axillary lymphadenectomy using needlescopic instruments in patients with breast cancer: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:307–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cundy TP, Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, MacKinnon T, Najmaldin AS, Yang GZ, et al. Robotic versus non-robotic instruments in spatially constrained operating workspaces: a pre-clinical randomized crossover study. BJU Int. 2015;116:415–22.CrossRef Cundy TP, Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, MacKinnon T, Najmaldin AS, Yang GZ, et al. Robotic versus non-robotic instruments in spatially constrained operating workspaces: a pre-clinical randomized crossover study. BJU Int. 2015;116:415–22.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Heo JE, Kang SK, Koh DH, Na JC, Lee YS, Han WK, et al. Pure single-site robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the da Vinci SP surgical system: initial experience. Investig Clin Urol. 2019;60:326–30.CrossRef Heo JE, Kang SK, Koh DH, Na JC, Lee YS, Han WK, et al. Pure single-site robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the da Vinci SP surgical system: initial experience. Investig Clin Urol. 2019;60:326–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Experimental evaluation of the fineness of needle forceps: advantages other than minimal access
Authors
Kenta Doden
Noriyuki Inaki
Toshikatsu Tsuji
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02224-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Surgery Today 7/2021 Go to the issue