Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Cholangiography | Original Article

Incidence of anastomotic stricture after hepaticojejunostomy with continuous sutures in patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors: Yuichi Nagakawa, Shingo Kozono, Chie Takishita, Hiroaki Osakabe, Hitoe Nishino, Naoya Nakagawa, Kenta Suzuki, Yutaka Hayashi, Tetsuo Ishizaki, Kenji Katsumata, Akihiko Tsuchida

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic hepatojejunostomy (HJ) with continuous sutures is commonly performed in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). This study aimed to investigate the long-term surgical outcomes of HJ in LPD.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 103 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy via laparoscopic HJ with continuous suturing using multifilament (n = 48) or monofilament-absorbable sutures (n = 47).

Results

During follow-up, anastomotic stricture of HJ was identified in 8 (7.8%) patients via balloon enteroscopy-assisted cholangiography. The median time from surgery to confirmation of stricture formation was 7.6 months (range 3.6–19.4). The incidence of HJ stricture was significantly higher in patients with a thin bile duct (diameter < 6.0 mm) than in those with a thick bile duct (diameter ≥ 6.0 mm) [7/27 (25.9%) vs. 1/76 (1.3%), respectively, p < 0.01]. Similarly, it was significantly higher in the monofilament group than in the multifilament group [7/54 (13.0%) vs. 1/49 (2.0%), respectively, p = 0.04]. In the monofilament suture group, 37.5% of patients with thin bile ducts developed stricture after HJ. A multivariate analysis revealed that a thin bile duct was an independent risk factor for HJ stricture (hazard ratio: 25.3, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Stricture after laparoscopic HJ using continuous sutures frequently occurs in patients with thin bile ducts, particularly when monofilament-absorbable suture is used.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:19–23.CrossRef Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:19–23.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:222–30.CrossRef Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:222–30.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:810–9.CrossRef Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:810–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim SC, Song KB, Jung YS, Kim YH, Park DH, Lee SS, et al. Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:95–103.CrossRef Kim SC, Song KB, Jung YS, Kim YH, Park DH, Lee SS, et al. Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:95–103.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262:372–7.CrossRef Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262:372–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, Babu NS, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Anand Vijai N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1443–50.CrossRef Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, Babu NS, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Anand Vijai N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1443–50.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Poves I, Burdío F, Morató O, Iglesias M, Radosevic A, Ilzarbe L, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018;268:731–9.CrossRef Poves I, Burdío F, Morató O, Iglesias M, Radosevic A, Ilzarbe L, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018;268:731–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a Pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg. 2019;269:10–7.CrossRef van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a Pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg. 2019;269:10–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference House MG, Cameron JL, Schulick RD, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, et al. Incidence and outcome of biliary strictures after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;243:571–6 (discussion 6–8).CrossRef House MG, Cameron JL, Schulick RD, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, et al. Incidence and outcome of biliary strictures after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;243:571–6 (discussion 6–8).CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Asano T, Natsume S, Senda Y, Sano T, Matsuo K, Kodera Y, et al. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic stenosis of continuous hepaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:628–35.CrossRef Asano T, Natsume S, Senda Y, Sano T, Matsuo K, Kodera Y, et al. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic stenosis of continuous hepaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:628–35.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Sumiyoshi T, Sui K, Iwata J, Morita S, et al. Incidence and risk factors of cholangitis after hepaticojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:676–83.CrossRef Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Sumiyoshi T, Sui K, Iwata J, Morita S, et al. Incidence and risk factors of cholangitis after hepaticojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:676–83.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dimou FM, Adhikari D, Mehta HB, Olino K, Riall TS, Brown KM. Incidence of hepaticojejunostomy stricture after hepaticojejunostomy. Surgery. 2016;160:691–8.CrossRef Dimou FM, Adhikari D, Mehta HB, Olino K, Riall TS, Brown KM. Incidence of hepaticojejunostomy stricture after hepaticojejunostomy. Surgery. 2016;160:691–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ueda H, Ban D, Kudo A, Ochiai T, Tanaka S, Tanabe M. Refractory long-term cholangitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study. World J Surg. 2017;41:1882–9.CrossRef Ueda H, Ban D, Kudo A, Ochiai T, Tanaka S, Tanabe M. Refractory long-term cholangitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study. World J Surg. 2017;41:1882–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Duconseil P, Turrini O, Ewald J, Berdah SV, Moutardier V, Delpero JR. Biliary complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: skinny bile ducts are surgeons’ enemies. World J Surg. 2014;38:2946–51.CrossRef Duconseil P, Turrini O, Ewald J, Berdah SV, Moutardier V, Delpero JR. Biliary complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: skinny bile ducts are surgeons’ enemies. World J Surg. 2014;38:2946–51.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nagakawa Y, Nakamura Y, Honda G, Gotoh Y, Ohtsuka T, Ban D, et al. Learning curve and surgical factors influencing the surgical outcomes during the initial experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:498–507.CrossRef Nagakawa Y, Nakamura Y, Honda G, Gotoh Y, Ohtsuka T, Ban D, et al. Learning curve and surgical factors influencing the surgical outcomes during the initial experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:498–507.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zielsdorf SM, Klein JJ, Fleetwood VA, Hertl M, Chan EY. Hepaticojejunostomy for benign disease: long-term stricture rate and management. Am Surg. 2019;85:1350–3.CrossRef Zielsdorf SM, Klein JJ, Fleetwood VA, Hertl M, Chan EY. Hepaticojejunostomy for benign disease: long-term stricture rate and management. Am Surg. 2019;85:1350–3.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Itokawa F, Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A, Moriyasu F. Single- and double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Roux-en-Y plus hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis and Whipple resection. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(Suppl 2):136–43.CrossRef Itokawa F, Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A, Moriyasu F. Single- and double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Roux-en-Y plus hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis and Whipple resection. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(Suppl 2):136–43.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Malgras B, Duron S, Gaujoux S, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Rebours V, et al. Early biliary complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: prevalence and risk factors. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18:367–74.CrossRef Malgras B, Duron S, Gaujoux S, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Rebours V, et al. Early biliary complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: prevalence and risk factors. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18:367–74.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bustos R, Fernandes E, Mangano A, Aguiluz G, Valle V, Masrur M, et al. Robotic hepaticojejunostomy: surgical technique and risk factor analysis for anastomotic leak and stenosis. HPB. 2020;22:1442–9.CrossRef Bustos R, Fernandes E, Mangano A, Aguiluz G, Valle V, Masrur M, et al. Robotic hepaticojejunostomy: surgical technique and risk factor analysis for anastomotic leak and stenosis. HPB. 2020;22:1442–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incidence of anastomotic stricture after hepaticojejunostomy with continuous sutures in patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
Yuichi Nagakawa
Shingo Kozono
Chie Takishita
Hiroaki Osakabe
Hitoe Nishino
Naoya Nakagawa
Kenta Suzuki
Yutaka Hayashi
Tetsuo Ishizaki
Kenji Katsumata
Akihiko Tsuchida
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02223-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Surgery Today 7/2021 Go to the issue