Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Diabetologica 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Losartan | Original Article

Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus: results from the PREVER-treatment randomized controlled trial

Authors: Flávio D. Fuchs, Luiz C. N. Scala, José F. Vilela-Martin, Paul K. Whelton, Carlos E. Poli-de-Figueiredo, Ricardo Pereira E Silva, Miguel Gus, Luiz A. Bortolotto, Fernanda M. Consolim-Colombo, Rosane P. Schlatter, José E. Cesarino, Iran Castro, José A. Figueiredo Neto, Hilton Chaves, André A. Steffens, João G. Alves, Andréa A. Brandão, Marcos R. de Sousa, Paulo C. Jardim, Leila B. Moreira, Roberto S. Franco, Marco M. Gomes, Abrahão Afiune Neto, Felipe C. Fuchs, Dario C. Sobral Filho, Antônio C. Nóbrega, Fernando Nobre, Otávio Berwanger, Sandra C. Fuchs

Published in: Acta Diabetologica | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

To compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of a chlorthalidone/amiloride combination pill with losartan, during initial management of JNC 7 Stage I hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

In an a priori subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, volunteers aged 30–70 years, with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus, were randomized to 12.5/2.5 mg of chlorthalidone/amiloride (N = 47) or 50 mg of losartan (N = 50), and followed for 18 months in 21 clinical centers. If BP remained uncontrolled after three months, study medication dose was doubled, and if uncontrolled after six months, amlodipine (5 and 10 mg) and propranolol (40 and 80 mg BID) were added as open label drugs in a progressive fashion.

Results

Systolic BP decreased to a greater extent in participants allocated to diuretics compared to losartan (P < 0.001). After 18 months of follow-up, systolic BP was 128.4 ± 10.3 mmHg in the diuretic group versus 133.5 ± 8.0 in the losartan group (P < 0.01). In the diuretic group, 36 out of 43 participants (83.7%) had a JNC 7 normal BP, compared to 31/47 (66%) in the losartan group (P = 0.089). Serum cholesterol was higher in the diuretic arm at the end of the trial. Other biochemical parameters and reports of adverse events did not differ by treatment.

Conclusions

Treatment of hypertension based on a combination of chlorthalidone and amiloride is more effective for BP lowering compared to losartan in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Trial registration

Clinical trials registration number: NCT00971165
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison-Himmelfarb C et al (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension 71:e13–e115. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065CrossRefPubMed Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison-Himmelfarb C et al (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension 71:e13–e115. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​HYP.​0000000000000065​CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fuchs FD (ed) (2018) Essentials of Hypertension. Springer, Cham Fuchs FD (ed) (2018) Essentials of Hypertension. Springer, Cham
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus: results from the PREVER-treatment randomized controlled trial
Authors
Flávio D. Fuchs
Luiz C. N. Scala
José F. Vilela-Martin
Paul K. Whelton
Carlos E. Poli-de-Figueiredo
Ricardo Pereira E Silva
Miguel Gus
Luiz A. Bortolotto
Fernanda M. Consolim-Colombo
Rosane P. Schlatter
José E. Cesarino
Iran Castro
José A. Figueiredo Neto
Hilton Chaves
André A. Steffens
João G. Alves
Andréa A. Brandão
Marcos R. de Sousa
Paulo C. Jardim
Leila B. Moreira
Roberto S. Franco
Marco M. Gomes
Abrahão Afiune Neto
Felipe C. Fuchs
Dario C. Sobral Filho
Antônio C. Nóbrega
Fernando Nobre
Otávio Berwanger
Sandra C. Fuchs
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Acta Diabetologica / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0940-5429
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01611-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Acta Diabetologica 2/2021 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.