Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Article

Anatomical feasibility for safe occipital condyle screw fixation

Authors: Ho Jin Lee, Doo Yong Choi, Myoung Hoon Shin, Jong Tae Kim, Il Sup Kim, Jae Taek Hong

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The occipital condyle (OC) screw can be a viable alternative option for the occipito-cervical fixation. However, the risk of vertebral artery (VA) injury during the direct OC screw fixation has not been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study was to establish the course of the VA (V3) relative to the nearby osseous structures to estimate the feasibility of OC screw fixation and describe its anatomical relationship depending on patient’s age and sex.

Methods

A total of 387 three-dimensional computed tomographic angiograms (3D-CTA) were used and compared between two age groups. The vertebral artery diameter and two kinds of bony space were measured. The occipito-C1 arch space (O-C1S) and VA-occipital bone distance (VOD, six entry points) were measured on both sides. The feasibility of direct OC screw fixation can be represented by the VOD value; the minimum feasible value was determined to be 4 mm. Angular measurements (O-C1A and O-C2A) were also taken to assess their relationship to the bony space.

Results

The mean value of the O-C1S ranged from 9.0 to 9.9 mm. The mean value of the VOD ranged from 3.2 to 3.5 mm, and the proportion of individuals for which direct OC screw fixation was considered feasible ranged from 32 to 42 % in both age groups and there was no significant difference between two age groups. The VOD value was not affected by laterality or by gender (P > 0.05). The mean kyphosis of the O-C1A (−5° ± 5.2°, range −22° to 8°) was significantly smaller in the young age group compared to the older age group (−7.6° ± 5.3°, range −26° to 2°). The mean lordosis of the O-C2A (12.4° ± 6.4°, range 3°–33°) was significantly higher in the young age group compared to the older age group (10.4° ± 6.4°, range 0°–36°).

Conclusions

The direct OC screw fixation was not possible in a considerable number of cases due to the limited space and the position of the VA regardless of age group. Only about one quarter (21–24 %) of all patients was affordable to place the direct OC screw bilaterally. There was more space available to place the direct OC screw when the angle of the upper cervical spine is more kyphotic.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Izeki M, Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Otsuki B, Watanabe M, Koizumi K, Matsuda A, Nagai K, Matsuda S (2013) Utility of the analysis of intracranial venous sinuses using preoperative computed tomography venography for safe occipital screw insertion. Spine 38:E1149–E1155. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829c0e1a CrossRefPubMed Izeki M, Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Otsuki B, Watanabe M, Koizumi K, Matsuda A, Nagai K, Matsuda S (2013) Utility of the analysis of intracranial venous sinuses using preoperative computed tomography venography for safe occipital screw insertion. Spine 38:E1149–E1155. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31829c0e1a​ CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hong JT, Takigawa T, Sugisaki K, Espinoza Orias AA, Inoue N, An HS (2011) Biomechanical and morphometric evaluation of occipital condyle for occipitocervical segmental fixation. Neurol Med Chir 51:701–706CrossRef Hong JT, Takigawa T, Sugisaki K, Espinoza Orias AA, Inoue N, An HS (2011) Biomechanical and morphometric evaluation of occipital condyle for occipitocervical segmental fixation. Neurol Med Chir 51:701–706CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Frankel BM, Hanley M, Vandergrift A, Monroe T, Morgan S, Rumboldt Z (2010) Posterior occipitocervical (C0–3) fusion using polyaxial occipital condyle to cervical spine screw and rod fixation: a radiographic and cadaveric analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 12:509–516. doi:10.3171/2009.11.spine09172 CrossRefPubMed Frankel BM, Hanley M, Vandergrift A, Monroe T, Morgan S, Rumboldt Z (2010) Posterior occipitocervical (C0–3) fusion using polyaxial occipital condyle to cervical spine screw and rod fixation: a radiographic and cadaveric analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 12:509–516. doi:10.​3171/​2009.​11.​spine09172 CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Hong JT, Lee SW, Son BC, Sung JH, Yang SH, Kim IS, Park CK (2008) Analysis of anatomical variations of bone and vascular structures around the posterior atlantal arch using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg Spine 8:230–236. doi:10.3171/spi/2008/8/3/230 CrossRefPubMed Hong JT, Lee SW, Son BC, Sung JH, Yang SH, Kim IS, Park CK (2008) Analysis of anatomical variations of bone and vascular structures around the posterior atlantal arch using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg Spine 8:230–236. doi:10.​3171/​spi/​2008/​8/​3/​230 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Maruiwa H, Nakamura M, Nishizawa T, Toyama Y (2003) Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg 99:80–83PubMed Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Maruiwa H, Nakamura M, Nishizawa T, Toyama Y (2003) Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg 99:80–83PubMed
15.
go back to reference Huang DG, He SM, Pan JW, Hui H, Hu HM, He BR, Li H, Zhang XF, Hao DJ (2014) Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion? Eur Spine J 23:1109–1114. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3217-y CrossRefPubMed Huang DG, He SM, Pan JW, Hui H, Hu HM, He BR, Li H, Zhang XF, Hao DJ (2014) Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion? Eur Spine J 23:1109–1114. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-014-3217-y CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Anatomical feasibility for safe occipital condyle screw fixation
Authors
Ho Jin Lee
Doo Yong Choi
Myoung Hoon Shin
Jong Tae Kim
Il Sup Kim
Jae Taek Hong
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4399-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

European Spine Journal 6/2016 Go to the issue