Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Original Article

Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?

Authors: Da-Geng Huang, Si-Min He, Jun-Wei Pan, Hua Hui, Hui-Min Hu, Bao-Rong He, Hui Li, Xue-Fang Zhang, Ding-Jun Hao

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of C1 pedicle screw fixation in patients whose atlas vertebral artery groove (defined as the C1 pedicle) height is less than 4 mm, but with a medullary canal.

Methods

From January 2010 to January 2013, 7 patients (6 males, 1 female) with atlantoaxial instability whose C1 pedicle height was less than 4.0 mm on one or both sides were treated by C1 pedicle screw fixation at our institution. Thirteen of the 14 C1 pedicles were less than 4.0 mm in height, but all had a medullary canal. Patients were followed up at regular intervals. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to assess if C1 pedicle screw placement was successful. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to postoperative complications, the American Spinal Injury Association grading system, and bone graft status.

Results

Thirteen C1 pedicles with a height less than 4.0 mm were inserted by 13 3.5- or 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screws, and one C1 pedicle whose height was 4.1 mm was inserted by a 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screw. In addition, 14 pedicle screws were inserted in the axis. The mean follow-up period was 23 (range 8–38) months. No neurologic or vascular complications occurred in any of the seven patients. Postoperative CT three-dimensional reconstruction images showed that all 14 pedicle screws were inserted in the C1 pedicles without destruction of the atlas pedicle cortical bone. All patients demonstrated bony fusion 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

If there is a medullary canal in the C1 pedicle, a 3.5- or 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screw can be safely inserted into the atlas and C1 pedicle screw fixation can be performed without any impact on fixation stability and clinical efficacy, even if the C1 pedicle height is less than 4.0 mm.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elliott RE, Tanweer O, Smith ML, Frempong-Boadu A (2013) Impact of starting point and bicortical purchase of C1 lateral mass screws on atlantoaxial fusion: meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828ffc97 Elliott RE, Tanweer O, Smith ML, Frempong-Boadu A (2013) Impact of starting point and bicortical purchase of C1 lateral mass screws on atlantoaxial fusion: meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0b013e31828ffc97​
2.
go back to reference Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Xiang M, Zhao WD, Zhong SZ (2009) C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:371–377. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318193a21b CrossRef Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Xiang M, Zhao WD, Zhong SZ (2009) C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:371–377. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318193a21b​ CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Resnick DK, Benzel EC (2002) C1–C2 pedicle screw fixation with rigid cantilever beam construct: case report and technical note. Neurosurgery 50:426–428PubMed Resnick DK, Benzel EC (2002) C1–C2 pedicle screw fixation with rigid cantilever beam construct: case report and technical note. Neurosurgery 50:426–428PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Zhong SZ (2005) Anatomic considerations for the pedicle screw placement in the first cervical vertebra. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1519–1523CrossRef Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Zhong SZ (2005) Anatomic considerations for the pedicle screw placement in the first cervical vertebra. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1519–1523CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Goel A, Laheri V (1994) Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 129:47–53CrossRef Goel A, Laheri V (1994) Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 129:47–53CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2467–2471CrossRef Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2467–2471CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Geck MJ, Truumees E, Hawthorne D, Singh D, Stokes JK, Flynn A (2013) Feasibility of rigid upper cervical instrumentation in children: tomographic analysis of children aged 2–6. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318291ce46 PubMed Geck MJ, Truumees E, Hawthorne D, Singh D, Stokes JK, Flynn A (2013) Feasibility of rigid upper cervical instrumentation in children: tomographic analysis of children aged 2–6. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0b013e318291ce46​ PubMed
18.
go back to reference Padua MR, Yeom JS, Em HT, Kim HJ, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD (2013) Feasibility of laminar screw placement in the upper thoracic spine: analysis using 3-dimensional computed tomographic simulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1146–1153. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828aadf5 CrossRef Padua MR, Yeom JS, Em HT, Kim HJ, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD (2013) Feasibility of laminar screw placement in the upper thoracic spine: analysis using 3-dimensional computed tomographic simulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1146–1153. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31828aadf5​ CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sjostrom L, Jacobsson O, Karlstrom G, Pech P, Rauschning W (1993) CT analysis of pedicles and screw tracts after implant removal in thoracolumbar fractures. J Spinal Disord 6:225–231PubMedCrossRef Sjostrom L, Jacobsson O, Karlstrom G, Pech P, Rauschning W (1993) CT analysis of pedicles and screw tracts after implant removal in thoracolumbar fractures. J Spinal Disord 6:225–231PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?
Authors
Da-Geng Huang
Si-Min He
Jun-Wei Pan
Hua Hui
Hui-Min Hu
Bao-Rong He
Hui Li
Xue-Fang Zhang
Ding-Jun Hao
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3217-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

European Spine Journal 5/2014 Go to the issue