Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2019

01-09-2019

Delaying laparoscopic surgery in pregnant patients with an equivocal acute appendicitis: a step-wise approach does not affect maternal or fetal safety

Authors: James Tankel, Shlomo Yellinek, Yonat Shechter, Dmitry Greenman, Alexander Ioscovich, Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky, Petachia Reissman

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Accurate and timely diagnoses of acute appendicitis (AA) during pregnancy avoids maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. We present our experience of using an initial transabdominal ultrasound (US) performed at presentation to diagnose AA in pregnant patients as well as the value of a delayed repeat study in those who remain equivocal. We explore the sensitivity and specificity of this algorithm as well as the maternal and fetal safety of this approach.

Methods

Of the 225 patients identified within the study period who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, 216 met the inclusion criteria and were retrospectively analyzed. If the US performed on presentation revealed AA, surgery was performed. Patients with a non-diagnostic US were admitted with surgery performed if there was clinical and/or biochemical deterioration. Patients who remained equivocal underwent a repeat delayed study. The results of the initial versus delayed studies were compared. Maternal and fetal complications were recorded and contrasted.

Results

Of the 216 patients included, 164 (75.9%) had AA, 14 (6.5%) had complicated AA and 38 (17.6%) had a normal appendix. Initial US was diagnostic for 125/216 (57.9%) of patients and 19/34 (55.8%) of patients who underwent a delayed repeat study. The remaining patients underwent empirical surgery. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US for the cohort was 79.2% and 92.1%, respectively. There was no difference in proxies of maternal or fetal safety between the groups.

Conclusion

US is a useful tool for diagnosing AA in pregnancy. In this cohort, performing a delayed repeat US during a period of observation in those patients who remained otherwise equivocal increased the diagnostic yield of the US. Delaying surgery in this specific group of patients does not affect maternal or fetal safety.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wilasrusmee C, Sukrat B, McEvoy M, Attia J, Thakkinstian A (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy. Br J Surg 99:1470–1478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilasrusmee C, Sukrat B, McEvoy M, Attia J, Thakkinstian A (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy. Br J Surg 99:1470–1478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Drake FT, Kotagal M, Simmons LE, Parr Z, Dighe MK, Flum DR (2015) Single institution and statewide performance of ultrasound in diagnosing appendicitis in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28(6):727–733CrossRefPubMed Drake FT, Kotagal M, Simmons LE, Parr Z, Dighe MK, Flum DR (2015) Single institution and statewide performance of ultrasound in diagnosing appendicitis in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28(6):727–733CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yazar FM, Bakacak M, Emre A, Urfalioglu A, Serin S, Cengiz E et al (2015) Predictive role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios for diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 31(11):591–596CrossRefPubMed Yazar FM, Bakacak M, Emre A, Urfalioglu A, Serin S, Cengiz E et al (2015) Predictive role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios for diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 31(11):591–596CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bickell NA, Aufses AH, Rojas M, Bodian C (2006) How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 202:401–406CrossRefPubMed Bickell NA, Aufses AH, Rojas M, Bodian C (2006) How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 202:401–406CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bouyou J, Gaujoux S, Marcellin L, Leconte M, Goffinet F, Chapron C et al (2015) Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy. J Visc Surg 152:S105–S115CrossRefPubMed Bouyou J, Gaujoux S, Marcellin L, Leconte M, Goffinet F, Chapron C et al (2015) Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy. J Visc Surg 152:S105–S115CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ito K, Ito H, Whang EE, Tavakkolizadeh A (2012) Appendectomy in pregnancy: evaluation of the risks of a negative appendectomy. Am J Surg 203(2):145–150CrossRefPubMed Ito K, Ito H, Whang EE, Tavakkolizadeh A (2012) Appendectomy in pregnancy: evaluation of the risks of a negative appendectomy. Am J Surg 203(2):145–150CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J (2004) MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. Am J Roentgenol 183(3):671–675CrossRef Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J (2004) MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. Am J Roentgenol 183(3):671–675CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 159:539–542CrossRef Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 159:539–542CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, Warnock N, Berbaum KS (1995) Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 20(2):149–151CrossRefPubMed Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, Warnock N, Berbaum KS (1995) Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 20(2):149–151CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lehnert BE, Gross JA, Linnau KF, Moshiri M (2012) Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 19:293–299CrossRefPubMed Lehnert BE, Gross JA, Linnau KF, Moshiri M (2012) Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 19:293–299CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Birchard KR, Brown M, Hyslop WB, Firat Z, Semelka RC (2005) MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:452–458CrossRefPubMed Birchard KR, Brown M, Hyslop WB, Firat Z, Semelka RC (2005) MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:452–458CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hauptfleisch J, Meagher TM, King D, López De Heredia L, Hughes RJ (2013) Out-of-hours MRI provision in the UK and models of service delivery. Clin Radiol 68(5):e245CrossRefPubMed Hauptfleisch J, Meagher TM, King D, López De Heredia L, Hughes RJ (2013) Out-of-hours MRI provision in the UK and models of service delivery. Clin Radiol 68(5):e245CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dilley A, Wesson D, Munden M, Hicks J, Brandt M, Minifee P et al (2001) The impact of ultrasound examinations on the management of children with suspected appendicitis: a 3-year analysis. J Pediatric Surg 36:303–308CrossRef Dilley A, Wesson D, Munden M, Hicks J, Brandt M, Minifee P et al (2001) The impact of ultrasound examinations on the management of children with suspected appendicitis: a 3-year analysis. J Pediatric Surg 36:303–308CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y (2007) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy—risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 5(3):192–197CrossRefPubMed Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y (2007) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy—risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 5(3):192–197CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM (2007) Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 205(4):534–540CrossRefPubMed McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM (2007) Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 205(4):534–540CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wallace CA, Petrov MS, Soybel DI, Ferzoco SJ, Ashley SW, Tavakkolizadeh A (2008) Influence of imaging on the negative appendectomy rate in pregnancy. J Gastrointest Surg 12(1):46–50CrossRefPubMed Wallace CA, Petrov MS, Soybel DI, Ferzoco SJ, Ashley SW, Tavakkolizadeh A (2008) Influence of imaging on the negative appendectomy rate in pregnancy. J Gastrointest Surg 12(1):46–50CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Delaying laparoscopic surgery in pregnant patients with an equivocal acute appendicitis: a step-wise approach does not affect maternal or fetal safety
Authors
James Tankel
Shlomo Yellinek
Yonat Shechter
Dmitry Greenman
Alexander Ioscovich
Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky
Petachia Reissman
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6600-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2019 Go to the issue