Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1/2008

01-01-2008 | SSAT quick shot

Influence of Imaging on the Negative Appendectomy Rate in Pregnancy

Authors: Carmelita A. Wallace, Maxim S. Petrov, David I. Soybel, Stephen J. Ferzoco, Stanley W. Ashley, Ali Tavakkolizadeh

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Appendectomy is the most common non-gynecologic surgery performed during pregnancy. Little data exist on the accuracy of imaging studies in the diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the probability of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scan in diagnosing appendicitis in pregnancy, as reflected in the negative appendectomy rate. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 86 pregnant women who underwent an appendectomy between January 1, 1997 and January 1, 2006. Patients were divided into three groups: clinical evaluation, ultrasound, and ultrasound followed by a CT scan. The clinical evaluation group had 13 patients, with a negative appendectomy rate of 54% (7/13). Fifty-five patients underwent an ultrasound alone, with a negative appendectomy rate 36% (20/55). In the ultrasound/CT group (n = 13), the negative appendectomy rate was 8% (1/13). There was a significant reduction in the negative appendectomy rate in the ultrasound/CT scan group compared to clinical evaluation group (54 vs 8%, p < 0.05). This reduction was not achieved in the ultrasound group when compared to the clinical evaluation group or the ultrasound/CT group (p = 0.05). A significant reduction was achieved when the ultrasound/CT group was compared to the patients in the ultrasound only group who had a normal or inconclusive ultrasound (p < 0.05). Our data documents a very high negative appendectomy rate in the pregnant patient. We recommend an ultrasound followed by a CT scan in patients with a normal or inconclusive ultrasound.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L. Appendicitis in pregnancy: New information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;82:1027–1029.CrossRef Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L. Appendicitis in pregnancy: New information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;82:1027–1029.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Andersson REB, Lambe M. Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1281–1285.PubMedCrossRef Andersson REB, Lambe M. Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1281–1285.PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Andersen B, Nielsen TF. Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:758–762.PubMedCrossRef Andersen B, Nielsen TF. Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:758–762.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:401–406.PubMedCrossRef Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:401–406.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasound to detect acute appendicitis I adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:537–546.PubMed Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasound to detect acute appendicitis I adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:537–546.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Miller JC. Risks from ionizing radiation in pregnancy. Radiology Rounds 2004;2. Miller JC. Risks from ionizing radiation in pregnancy. Radiology Rounds 2004;2.
8.
go back to reference Styrud J, Josephson T, Eriksson S. Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis. Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12:65–68.PubMedCrossRef Styrud J, Josephson T, Eriksson S. Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis. Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12:65–68.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Poortman P, Lohle P, Shoemaker C, Oostvogel H, Teepen H, Zwinderman K, Hamming J. Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A blinded prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1355–1359.PubMed Poortman P, Lohle P, Shoemaker C, Oostvogel H, Teepen H, Zwinderman K, Hamming J. Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A blinded prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1355–1359.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, et al. Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 1995;20:149–151.PubMedCrossRef Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, et al. Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 1995;20:149–151.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:539–542.PubMed Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:539–542.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, et al. MR Imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 2006;38:891–899.CrossRef Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, et al. MR Imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 2006;38:891–899.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kuczkowski KM. Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy: what are the risks of anesthesia? Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004;59:52–56.PubMedCrossRef Kuczkowski KM. Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy: what are the risks of anesthesia? Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004;59:52–56.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of Imaging on the Negative Appendectomy Rate in Pregnancy
Authors
Carmelita A. Wallace
Maxim S. Petrov
David I. Soybel
Stephen J. Ferzoco
Stanley W. Ashley
Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0377-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1/2008 Go to the issue