Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Original Article

Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy

Authors: Bruce E. Lehnert, Joel A. Gross, Ken F. Linnau, Mariam Moshiri

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the right lower quadrant ultrasounds in women presenting during the second or third trimester of pregnancy for the frequency of appendix visualization and accuracy in diagnosing appendicitis. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. We reviewed imaging records from 99 consecutive pregnant women from 2001 to 2011 who presented during the second (≥14 weeks gestation) or third trimester for right lower quadrant ultrasound to evaluate the appendix. Visualization of the appendix as well as the size and compressibility, if identified, were recorded. The medical records and labs related to the initial patient presentation, subsequent management, and follow-up were reviewed for surgical and clinical outcomes. Pathology records were reviewed to determine if appendicitis was present when appendectomy was performed. Patients who underwent appendectomy were considered to have appendicitis based on pathology results, and patients managed non-operatively with symptom improvement and those with a normal appendix at pathology were considered to not have appendicitis. During the study period, 99 women meeting inclusion criteria presented to our institution for right lower quadrant ultrasound to evaluate the appendix during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. The mean gestational age at presentation was 23 weeks (±7 weeks). The mean maternal age was 28 years (±6.6 years). The appendix was not visualized in 97% (96/99) of right lower quadrant ultrasound examinations. Of the three studies in which the appendix was visualized, two were considered positive for appendicitis and one was considered negative. Eight patients in this group ultimately underwent appendectomy, including the two patients with positive right lower quadrant ultrasounds, and appendicitis confirmed at pathology in seven of these cases (87.5%). Right lower quadrant ultrasound successfully demonstrated an abnormal appendix in 28.7% (two of seven) of surgically confirmed cases; however, this technique did not detect appendicitis in 71% (five of seven) of patients with surgically proven disease due to nonvisualization of the appendix. Retrospective review of right lower quadrant ultrasounds performed during the second and third trimester of pregnancy suggests that this modality has limited utility for diagnosing appendicitis due to infrequent visualization of the appendix.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kort B, Katz VL, Watson WJ (1993) The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:371–376PubMed Kort B, Katz VL, Watson WJ (1993) The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:371–376PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kammerer WS (1979) Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 63:1157–1164PubMed Kammerer WS (1979) Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 63:1157–1164PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kammerer WS (1987) Nonobstetric surgery in pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 71:551–560PubMed Kammerer WS (1987) Nonobstetric surgery in pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 71:551–560PubMed
4.
go back to reference Andersen B, Nielsen TF (1999) Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78:758–762PubMedCrossRef Andersen B, Nielsen TF (1999) Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78:758–762PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L (2000) Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1027–1029PubMedCrossRef Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L (2000) Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1027–1029PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stone K (2002) Acute abdominal emergencies associated with pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:553–561PubMedCrossRef Stone K (2002) Acute abdominal emergencies associated with pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:553–561PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bailey LE, Finley RK, Miller SF, Jones LM (1986) Acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Am Surg 52:218–221PubMed Bailey LE, Finley RK, Miller SF, Jones LM (1986) Acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Am Surg 52:218–221PubMed
8.
go back to reference Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y (2007) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy—risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 5:192–197PubMedCrossRef Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y (2007) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy—risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 5:192–197PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ (1992) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41PubMed Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ (1992) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41PubMed
11.
go back to reference Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA et al (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317PubMedCrossRef Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA et al (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hale DA, Molloy M, Pearl RH, Schutt DC, Jaques DP (1997) Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg 225:252–261PubMedCrossRef Hale DA, Molloy M, Pearl RH, Schutt DC, Jaques DP (1997) Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg 225:252–261PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281PubMedCrossRef Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Rofsky NM, Zucker R (1998) Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Am J Gastroenterol 93:768–771PubMedCrossRef Balthazar EJ, Rofsky NM, Zucker R (1998) Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Am J Gastroenterol 93:768–771PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffrey RB (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136PubMedCrossRef Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffrey RB (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM (2007) Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 205:534–540PubMedCrossRef McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM (2007) Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 205:534–540PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ueberrueck T, Koch A, Meyer L, Hinkel M, Gastinger I (2004) Ninety-four appendectomies for suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy. World J Surg 28:508–511PubMedCrossRef Ueberrueck T, Koch A, Meyer L, Hinkel M, Gastinger I (2004) Ninety-four appendectomies for suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy. World J Surg 28:508–511PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mazze RI, Källén B (1991) Appendectomy during pregnancy: a Swedish registry study of 778 cases. Obstet Gynecol 77:835–840PubMed Mazze RI, Källén B (1991) Appendectomy during pregnancy: a Swedish registry study of 778 cases. Obstet Gynecol 77:835–840PubMed
20.
go back to reference Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB et al (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468PubMedCrossRef Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB et al (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Basaran A, Basaran M (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64:481–488, quiz 499PubMedCrossRef Basaran A, Basaran M (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64:481–488, quiz 499PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112:333–340PubMedCrossRef Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112:333–340PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA et al (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 8:749–755PubMedCrossRef Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA et al (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 8:749–755PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360PubMed Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360PubMed
25.
go back to reference Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI et al (1987) A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 317:666–669PubMedCrossRef Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI et al (1987) A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 317:666–669PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C (1994) Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 190:31–35PubMed Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C (1994) Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 190:31–35PubMed
27.
go back to reference Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:539–542PubMed Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:539–542PubMed
28.
go back to reference Israel GM, Malguria N, McCarthy S, Copel J, Weinreb J (2008) MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:428–433PubMedCrossRef Israel GM, Malguria N, McCarthy S, Copel J, Weinreb J (2008) MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:428–433PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Oto A, Srinivasan PN, Ernst RD et al (2006) Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:883–887PubMedCrossRef Oto A, Srinivasan PN, Ernst RD et al (2006) Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:883–887PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Baer JL, Reis RA, Arens RA (1932) Appendicitis in pregnancy with changes in position and axis of the normal appendix in pregnancy. JAMA 98:1359–1364CrossRef Baer JL, Reis RA, Arens RA (1932) Appendicitis in pregnancy with changes in position and axis of the normal appendix in pregnancy. JAMA 98:1359–1364CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, Warnock N, Berbaum KS (1995) Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 20:149–151PubMedCrossRef Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, Warnock N, Berbaum KS (1995) Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 20:149–151PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM (2006) MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 238:891–899PubMedCrossRef Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM (2006) MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 238:891–899PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J (2004) MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:671–675PubMed Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J (2004) MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:671–675PubMed
34.
go back to reference Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al (2009) Levels of evidence. Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, Oxford Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al (2009) Levels of evidence. Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, Oxford
35.
go back to reference Andersson RE, Lambe M (2001) Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 30:1281–1285PubMedCrossRef Andersson RE, Lambe M (2001) Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 30:1281–1285PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92PubMedCrossRef Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy
Authors
Bruce E. Lehnert
Joel A. Gross
Ken F. Linnau
Mariam Moshiri
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1029-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Emergency Radiology 4/2012 Go to the issue