Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 7/2011

01-10-2011 | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Authors: Yanming Zhou, Donghui Xu, Lupeng Wu, Bin Li

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The choice between anatomic resection (AR) versus nonanatomic resection (NAR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. This study is a meta-analysis of the available evidence.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing AR with NAR for HCC published from 1985 to 2009 in PubMed and Medline database, Cochrane database, Embase database, and Science Citation index were conducted. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence rate were considered as primary outcomes. Pooled effect was calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model.

Results

Sixteen nonrandomized studies involving 2,917 patients were analyzed; 1,577 patients were in the AR group, and 1,340 were in the NAR group. Patients in the AR group were characterized by lower prevalence of cirrhosis and hepatitis virus infection, more favorable hepatic function, and larger tumor size compared with patients in the NAR group. AR provided a better 5-year overall survival than NAR (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.15–2.32). Local recurrence (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16–0.50) and early (≤2 years) recurrence (OR, 0.55; 95 CI, 0.34–0.89) were all significantly lower in the AR group. AR improved disease-free survival significantly at 3 years (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.52–2.88) and 5 years (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.85–2.72). No differences were found between the two groups with respect to postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

AR was superior to NAR in terms of better survival and preventing local recurrence for the treatment of HCC.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Adachi E, Maeda T, Kajiyama K, Kinukawa N, Matsumata T, Sugimachi K, Tsuneyoshi M (1996) Factors correlated with portal venous invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses of 232 resected cases without preoperative treatments. Cancer 77:2022–2031PubMedCrossRef Adachi E, Maeda T, Kajiyama K, Kinukawa N, Matsumata T, Sugimachi K, Tsuneyoshi M (1996) Factors correlated with portal venous invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses of 232 resected cases without preoperative treatments. Cancer 77:2022–2031PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S (1985) Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:346–350PubMed Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S (1985) Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:346–350PubMed
7.
go back to reference Fuster J, García-Valdecasas JC, Grande L et al (1996) Hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Results of surgical treatment in a European series. Ann Surg 223:297–302PubMedCrossRef Fuster J, García-Valdecasas JC, Grande L et al (1996) Hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Results of surgical treatment in a European series. Ann Surg 223:297–302PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, Ishida K, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S (1999) Prognostic significance of anatomical resection and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 86:1032–1038PubMedCrossRef Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, Ishida K, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S (1999) Prognostic significance of anatomical resection and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 86:1032–1038PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Ohtsubo T, Katsuragawa H, Fukuda C, Katagiri S (2001) Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson's pedicle transection at the hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis. Surgery 130:443–448. doi:10.1067/msy.2001.116406 PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Ohtsubo T, Katsuragawa H, Fukuda C, Katagiri S (2001) Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson's pedicle transection at the hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis. Surgery 130:443–448. doi:10.​1067/​msy.​2001.​116406 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Itoh S, Kitagawa D, Kayashima H, Harimoto N, Tsujita E, Kuroda Y, Maehara Y (2007) Long term favorable results of limited hepatic resections for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: 20 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 205:19–26. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.069 PubMedCrossRef Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Itoh S, Kitagawa D, Kayashima H, Harimoto N, Tsujita E, Kuroda Y, Maehara Y (2007) Long term favorable results of limited hepatic resections for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: 20 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 205:19–26. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jamcollsurg.​2007.​01.​069 PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Tanaka E et al (2003) Risk factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. J Hepatol 38:200–207PubMedCrossRef Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Tanaka E et al (2003) Risk factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. J Hepatol 38:200–207PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S et al (2008) Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery 143(4):469–75. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.12.003 PubMedCrossRef Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S et al (2008) Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery 143(4):469–75. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2007.​12.​003 PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cho YB, Lee KU, Lee HW et al (2007) Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for small single hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 54:1766–1769PubMed Cho YB, Lee KU, Lee HW et al (2007) Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for small single hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 54:1766–1769PubMed
21.
go back to reference Arii S, Tanaka S, Mitsunori Y, Nakamura N, Kudo A, Noguchi N, Irie T (2010) Surgical strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma with special reference to anatomical hepatic resection and intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Oncology 78(Suppl 1):125–130. doi:10.1159/000315240 PubMedCrossRef Arii S, Tanaka S, Mitsunori Y, Nakamura N, Kudo A, Noguchi N, Irie T (2010) Surgical strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma with special reference to anatomical hepatic resection and intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Oncology 78(Suppl 1):125–130. doi:10.​1159/​000315240 PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O, Dondero F, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J (2002) Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 131:311–317. doi:10.1067/msy.2002.121892 PubMedCrossRef Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O, Dondero F, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J (2002) Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 131:311–317. doi:10.​1067/​msy.​2002.​121892 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nanashima A, Sumida Y, Abo T et al (2008) Comparison of survival between anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: significance of surgical margin in non-anatomic resection. Acta Chir Belg 108:532–537PubMed Nanashima A, Sumida Y, Abo T et al (2008) Comparison of survival between anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: significance of surgical margin in non-anatomic resection. Acta Chir Belg 108:532–537PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kobayashi A, Miyagawa S, Miwa S, Nakata T (2008) Prognostic impact of anatomical resection on early and late intrahepatic recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:515–521. doi:10.1007/s00534-007-1293-7 PubMedCrossRef Kobayashi A, Miyagawa S, Miwa S, Nakata T (2008) Prognostic impact of anatomical resection on early and late intrahepatic recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:515–521. doi:10.​1007/​s00534-007-1293-7 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ueno S, Kubo F, Sakoda M et al (2008) Efficacy of anatomic resection vs nonanatomic resection for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma based on gross classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:493–500. doi:10.1007/s00534-007-1312-8 PubMedCrossRef Ueno S, Kubo F, Sakoda M et al (2008) Efficacy of anatomic resection vs nonanatomic resection for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma based on gross classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:493–500. doi:10.​1007/​s00534-007-1312-8 PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kamiyama T, Nakanishi K, Yokoo H, Kamachi H, Matsushita M, Todo S (2010) The impact of anatomical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma that meets the Milan criteria. J Surg Oncol 101:54–60. doi:10.1002/jso.21414 PubMedCrossRef Kamiyama T, Nakanishi K, Yokoo H, Kamachi H, Matsushita M, Todo S (2010) The impact of anatomical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma that meets the Milan criteria. J Surg Oncol 101:54–60. doi:10.​1002/​jso.​21414 PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Eltawil KM, Kidd M, Giovinazzo F, Helmy AH, Salem RR (2010) Differentiating the impact of anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection on early recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 8:43. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-8-43 PubMedCrossRef Eltawil KM, Kidd M, Giovinazzo F, Helmy AH, Salem RR (2010) Differentiating the impact of anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection on early recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 8:43. doi:10.​1186/​1477-7819-8-43 PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Yamazaki O, Matsuyama M, Horii K et al (2010) Comparison of the outcomes between anatomical resection and limited resection for single hepatocellular carcinomas no larger than 5 cm in diameter: a single-center study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:349–358. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0253-9 PubMedCrossRef Yamazaki O, Matsuyama M, Horii K et al (2010) Comparison of the outcomes between anatomical resection and limited resection for single hepatocellular carcinomas no larger than 5 cm in diameter: a single-center study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:349–358. doi:10.​1007/​s00534-009-0253-9 PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Song F, Eastwood AJ, Gilbody S, Duley L, Sutton AJ (2000) Publication and related biases. Health Technol Assess 4:1–105 Song F, Eastwood AJ, Gilbody S, Duley L, Sutton AJ (2000) Publication and related biases. Health Technol Assess 4:1–105
36.
go back to reference Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(iii-x):1–173 Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(iii-x):1–173
37.
go back to reference Ferguson D, Laupacis A, Salmi LR, McAlister FA, Huet C (2000) What should be included in meta-analysis? An exploration of methodological issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:1109–1119CrossRef Ferguson D, Laupacis A, Salmi LR, McAlister FA, Huet C (2000) What should be included in meta-analysis? An exploration of methodological issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:1109–1119CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Meta-analysis of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma
Authors
Yanming Zhou
Donghui Xu
Lupeng Wu
Bin Li
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0784-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 7/2011 Go to the issue