Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Infertility | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Only women’s age and the duration of infertility are the prognostic factors for the success rate of natural cycle IVF

Authors: Michael von Wolff, Alexandra Kohl Schwartz, Norman Bitterlich, Petra Stute, Monika Fäh

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

It is controversial who should be recommended to undergo natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF). Therefore, objective prognostic criteria which are already known at the time of counselling were defined.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was performed with 201 couples (age 34.7 ± 4.1) undergoing 311 NC-IVF treatments with 201 transfers, corresponding to a transfer rate of 65.3%. The first cycle resulting in a transfer of one embryo was further analysed. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were analysed.

Results

Pregnancy rate and live birth rates per first cycle were 21.9% and 13.2%, respectively. Groupwise comparison revealed the following clinical pregnancy/live birth rates per transfer cycle: duration of infertility 1–2 years 34.3/25.7%, 3–4 years 21.8/14.9% and > 4 years 9.1/4.5%. Women’s age  < 34 years 26.3/22.4%, 34–37 years 25.7/18.9% and 38–42 years 15.7/3.9%. Linear regression analysis showed that pregnancy and live birth rate correlated negatively with the duration of infertility and that live birth rate but not pregnancy rate correlated negatively with increasing female age. In contrast, AMH and infertility factors did not correlate with the success rate. Statistically significant correlations remained if a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, supporting further that the duration of infertility (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.86) (P = 0.006) and female age (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.95) (P = 0.008) are the predictors for live birth rates in NC-IVF transfer cycles.

Conclusions

Based on the success rates, NC-IVF can especially be recommended for women with short duration of infertility and young age, whereas older women and those with long duration of infertility are not the best candidates for this technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gordon JD, DiMattina M, Reh A, Botes A, Celia G, Payson M (2013) Utilization and success rates of unstimulated in vitro fertilization in the United States: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database. Fertil Steril 100:392–395CrossRefPubMed Gordon JD, DiMattina M, Reh A, Botes A, Celia G, Payson M (2013) Utilization and success rates of unstimulated in vitro fertilization in the United States: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database. Fertil Steril 100:392–395CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Haemmerli Keller K, Alder G, Faeh M, Rohner S, von Wolff M (2018) Three natural cycle IVF treatment imposes less psychological stress than one conventional IVF treatment cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 97:269–276CrossRefPubMed Haemmerli Keller K, Alder G, Faeh M, Rohner S, von Wolff M (2018) Three natural cycle IVF treatment imposes less psychological stress than one conventional IVF treatment cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 97:269–276CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference von Wolff M, Rohner S, Santi A, Stute P, Popovici R, Weiss B (2014) Modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization an alternative in vitro fertilization treatment with lower costs per achieved pregnancy but longer treatment time. J Reprod Med 59:553–559 von Wolff M, Rohner S, Santi A, Stute P, Popovici R, Weiss B (2014) Modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization an alternative in vitro fertilization treatment with lower costs per achieved pregnancy but longer treatment time. J Reprod Med 59:553–559
5.
go back to reference Aleersma T, Farquhar C, Cantineau AE (2013) Natural cycle in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for subfertile couples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD010550 Aleersma T, Farquhar C, Cantineau AE (2013) Natural cycle in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for subfertile couples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD010550
6.
go back to reference van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F (2010) Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 16:577–589CrossRefPubMed van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F (2010) Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 16:577–589CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wang YA, Healy D, Black D, Sullivan EA (2008) Age-specific success rate for women undertaking their first assisted reproduction technology treatment using their own oocytes in Australia, 2002–2005. Hum Reprod 23:1633–1638CrossRefPubMed Wang YA, Healy D, Black D, Sullivan EA (2008) Age-specific success rate for women undertaking their first assisted reproduction technology treatment using their own oocytes in Australia, 2002–2005. Hum Reprod 23:1633–1638CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference González-Foruria I, Peñarrubia J, Borràs A, Manau D, Casals G, Peralta S, Creus M, Ferreri J, Vidal E, Carmona F, Balasch J, Fàbregues F (2016) Age, independent from ovarian reserve status, is the main prognostic factor in natural cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 106:342–347.e2CrossRefPubMed González-Foruria I, Peñarrubia J, Borràs A, Manau D, Casals G, Peralta S, Creus M, Ferreri J, Vidal E, Carmona F, Balasch J, Fàbregues F (2016) Age, independent from ovarian reserve status, is the main prognostic factor in natural cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 106:342–347.e2CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, Broekmans FJ (2014) Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 20:530–541CrossRefPubMed Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, Broekmans FJ (2014) Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 20:530–541CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mitter V, Kohl Schwartz A, Fäh M, Griesinger G, von Wolff M (2017) Endometrial thickness is associated with the clinical pregnancy rate in unstimulated menstrual cycles—a study based on natural cycle IVF. Hum Reprod 32(Supp 1):i351–i352 Mitter V, Kohl Schwartz A, Fäh M, Griesinger G, von Wolff M (2017) Endometrial thickness is associated with the clinical pregnancy rate in unstimulated menstrual cycles—a study based on natural cycle IVF. Hum Reprod 32(Supp 1):i351–i352
11.
go back to reference von Wolff M, Nitzschke M, Stute P, Bitterlich N, Rohner S (2014) Low-dosage clomiphene reduces premature ovulation rates and increases transfer rates in natural-cycle IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 29:209–215CrossRef von Wolff M, Nitzschke M, Stute P, Bitterlich N, Rohner S (2014) Low-dosage clomiphene reduces premature ovulation rates and increases transfer rates in natural-cycle IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 29:209–215CrossRef
12.
go back to reference von Wolff M, Hua YZ, Santi A, Ocon E, Weiss B (2013) Follicle flushing in monofollicular IVF almost doubles the number of transferable embryos. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:346–368CrossRef von Wolff M, Hua YZ, Santi A, Ocon E, Weiss B (2013) Follicle flushing in monofollicular IVF almost doubles the number of transferable embryos. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:346–368CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kawachiya S, Matsumoto T, Bodri D, Kato K, Takehara Y, Kato O (2012) Short-term, low-dose, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug application diminishes premature ovulation in natural-cycle IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 24:308–313CrossRefPubMed Kawachiya S, Matsumoto T, Bodri D, Kato K, Takehara Y, Kato O (2012) Short-term, low-dose, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug application diminishes premature ovulation in natural-cycle IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 24:308–313CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Only women’s age and the duration of infertility are the prognostic factors for the success rate of natural cycle IVF
Authors
Michael von Wolff
Alexandra Kohl Schwartz
Norman Bitterlich
Petra Stute
Monika Fäh
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-5034-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2019 Go to the issue