Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Original Article

A comparison between intrastomal 3D ultrasonography, CT scanning and findings at surgery in patients with stomal complaints

Authors: P. Näsvall, F. Wikner, U. Gunnarsson, J. Rutegård, K. Strigård

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Since there are no reliable investigative tools for imaging parastomal hernia, new techniques are needed. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of intrastomal three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D) as an alternative to CT scanning for the assessment of stomal complaints.

Method

Twenty patients with stomal complaints, indicating surgery, were examined preoperatively with a CT scan in the supine position and 3D intrastomal ultrasonography in the supine and erect positions. Comparison with findings at surgery, considered to be the true state, was made.

Results

Both imaging methods, 3D ultrasonography and CT scanning, showed high sensitivity (ultrasound 15/18, CT scan 15/18) and specificity (ultrasound 2/2, CT scan 1/2) when judged by a dedicated radiologist. Corresponding values for interpretation of CT scans in routine clinical practice was for sensitivity 17/18 and for specificity 1/2.

Conclusion

3D ultrasonography has a high validity and is a promising alternative to CT scanning in the supine position to distinguish a bulge from a parastomal hernia.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1559–1563PubMedCrossRef Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1559–1563PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Londono-Schimmer E, Leong A, Phillips R (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920PubMedCrossRef Londono-Schimmer E, Leong A, Phillips R (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gurmu A, Matthiessen P, Nilsson S, Påhlman L, Rutegård J, Gunnarsson U (2011) The inter-observer reliability is very low at clinical examination of parastomal hernia. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(1):89–95PubMedCrossRef Gurmu A, Matthiessen P, Nilsson S, Påhlman L, Rutegård J, Gunnarsson U (2011) The inter-observer reliability is very low at clinical examination of parastomal hernia. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(1):89–95PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moreno‐Matias J, Serra‐Aracil X, Darnell‐Martin A, Bombardo‐Junca J, Mora‐Lopez L, Alcantara‐Moral M et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico‐radiological classification. Color Dis 11(2):173–177CrossRef Moreno‐Matias J, Serra‐Aracil X, Darnell‐Martin A, Bombardo‐Junca J, Mora‐Lopez L, Alcantara‐Moral M et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico‐radiological classification. Color Dis 11(2):173–177CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jänes A, Weisby L, Israelsson LA (2011) Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions. Hernia 15(2):189–192PubMedCrossRef Jänes A, Weisby L, Israelsson LA (2011) Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions. Hernia 15(2):189–192PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sjödahl RI, Thorelius L, Hallböök OJ (2011) Ultrasonographic findings in patients with peristomal bulging. Scand J Gastroenterol 46(6):745–9PubMedCrossRef Sjödahl RI, Thorelius L, Hallböök OJ (2011) Ultrasonographic findings in patients with peristomal bulging. Scand J Gastroenterol 46(6):745–9PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gurmu A, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K (2011) Imaging of parastomal hernia using three‐dimensional intrastomal ultrasonography. Br J Surg 98(7):1026–1029PubMedCrossRef Gurmu A, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K (2011) Imaging of parastomal hernia using three‐dimensional intrastomal ultrasonography. Br J Surg 98(7):1026–1029PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Strigård K, Gurmu A, Näsvall P, Påhlman P, Gunnarsson U (2013) Intrastomal 3D ultrasound; an inter- and intra-observer evaluation. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef Strigård K, Gurmu A, Näsvall P, Påhlman P, Gunnarsson U (2013) Intrastomal 3D ultrasound; an inter- and intra-observer evaluation. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gunnarsson U, Strigård K (2012) 3D intrastomal ultrasonography, an instrument for detecting stoma-related fistula. Tech Coloproctol 16(3):233–236PubMedCrossRef Gunnarsson U, Strigård K (2012) 3D intrastomal ultrasonography, an instrument for detecting stoma-related fistula. Tech Coloproctol 16(3):233–236PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brandl H, Gritzky A, Haizinger M (1999) 3D ultrasound: a dedicated system. Eur Radiol 9(3):S331–S333PubMedCrossRef Brandl H, Gritzky A, Haizinger M (1999) 3D ultrasound: a dedicated system. Eur Radiol 9(3):S331–S333PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A comparison between intrastomal 3D ultrasonography, CT scanning and findings at surgery in patients with stomal complaints
Authors
P. Näsvall
F. Wikner
U. Gunnarsson
J. Rutegård
K. Strigård
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1944-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2014 Go to the issue