Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 2/2011

01-04-2011 | Original Article

Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions

Authors: A. Jänes, L. Weisby, L. A. Israelsson

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication after stoma formation. No consistent definition of parastomal hernia has been used in previous studies using clinical examination or computed tomography (CT) scan. The correlation between herniation rates found with clinical examination and CT scan has been poor. A definition of parastomal hernia with clinical examination that correlates with findings from CT scan should be sought.

Methods

Parastomal hernia, was with surgeons’ clinical examination, defined as any protrusion in the vicinity of the stoma with the patient straining in a supine and an erect position. A new CT scan method was developed with the patient examined in the prone position. Radiologists defined herniation as any intra-abdominal content protruding beyond the peritoneum or the presence of a hernia sac. The correlation between investigators and methods were estimated by calculating Fleiss’ Kappa values.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were assessed by three surgeons and three radiologists. For the surgeons, the Kappa value was 0.85. For the radiologists, it was 0.85 with CT scan in the prone position and 0.82 in the supine position. For the surgeons and radiologists collectively, the Kappa value was 0.80 for CT scan in the prone position and 0.63 in the supine position.

Conclusion

With the new CT scan method examining patients in the prone position, the clinical and radiological definitions were highly reproducible and correlated strongly between methods and raters. With the strong correlation between clinical and radiological assessments, clinical examination alone is sufficient as follow-up. Conventional CT scan with the patient supine is not a reliable tool for diagnosing parastomal hernia.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563PubMedCrossRef Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 91:280–282PubMedCrossRef Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 91:280–282PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 33:118–121 discussion 122-3PubMedCrossRef Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 33:118–121 discussion 122-3PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch Surg 139:1356–1358PubMedCrossRef Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch Surg 139:1356–1358PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, Mathew G (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 8:672–675PubMedCrossRef Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, Mathew G (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 8:672–675PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hammond TM, Huang A, Prosser K, Frye JN, Williams NS (2008) Parastomal hernia prevention using a novel collagen implant: a randomised controlled phase 1 study. Hernia 12:475–481PubMedCrossRef Hammond TM, Huang A, Prosser K, Frye JN, Williams NS (2008) Parastomal hernia prevention using a novel collagen implant: a randomised controlled phase 1 study. Hernia 12:475–481PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, Darnell A, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S (2009) Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 249:583–587PubMedCrossRef Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, Darnell A, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S (2009) Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 249:583–587PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gögenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T, Rosenberg J, Fischer A (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1131–1135PubMedCrossRef Gögenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T, Rosenberg J, Fischer A (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1131–1135PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ortiz H, Sara MJ, Armendariz P, de Miguel M, Marti J, Chocarro C (1994) Does the frequency of paracolostomy hernias depend on the position of the colostomy in the abdominal wall? Int J Colorectal Dis 9:65–67PubMedCrossRef Ortiz H, Sara MJ, Armendariz P, de Miguel M, Marti J, Chocarro C (1994) Does the frequency of paracolostomy hernias depend on the position of the colostomy in the abdominal wall? Int J Colorectal Dis 9:65–67PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Helgstrand F, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J (2008) Prevention of parastomal hernia by the placement of a mesh at the primary operation. Hernia 12:577–582PubMedCrossRef Helgstrand F, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J (2008) Prevention of parastomal hernia by the placement of a mesh at the primary operation. Hernia 12:577–582PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, Bombardo-Junca J, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Rebasa P, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 11:173–177PubMedCrossRef Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, Bombardo-Junca J, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Rebasa P, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 11:173–177PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Olsen M, Gamble P, Chiu M, Tumia N, Boyle RA, Schemitsch EH (2010) Assessment of accuracy and reliability in preoperative templating for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:445–449PubMedCrossRef Olsen M, Gamble P, Chiu M, Tumia N, Boyle RA, Schemitsch EH (2010) Assessment of accuracy and reliability in preoperative templating for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:445–449PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions
Authors
A. Jänes
L. Weisby
L. A. Israelsson
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Hernia / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0769-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Hernia 2/2011 Go to the issue