Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Computed Tomography | Musculoskeletal

Milk cloud appearance—a characteristic sign of fibrous dysplasia on contrast-enhanced MR imaging

Authors: Daniela Franz, Judith Wechselberger, Michael Rasper, Katja Specht, Victoria Kehl, Ernst J. Rummeny, Klaus Woertler

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images in histologically proven fibrous dysplasia (FD) for the prevalence of “milk cloud appearance” and its association with ground-glass appearance (GGA) on radiography or computed tomography (CT).

Methods

For this retrospective cohort study, 37 patients with histologically proven FD imaged preoperatively with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and radiography or CT were identified at our institution. Three radiologists independently evaluated MR images for the presence of milk cloud appearance on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images, sites of skeletal involvement, type of bone involved, uni- vs. multifocality, mono- vs. polyostotic disease, maximum diameter, proportion of bone involved, expansile remodeling, and T2 homogeneity. The presence or absence of GGA on radiography or CT was determined in consensus. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated for milk cloud appearance using Cohen’s kappa, and associations between milk cloud appearance and other imaging parameters were tested using Spearman’s rho.

Results

Among the 37 histologically proven FD lesions, GGA was identified in 70% of the lesions, while milk cloud appearance was found in 82% of the lesions. Inter-reader agreement for milk cloud appearance on MR imaging was good to excellent (κ 0.65, 0.82, and 0.8). A significant correlation was found between milk cloud appearance and GGA (ρ = 0.31, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Milk cloud appearance is a characteristic sign of FD on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. Recognition of this feature may be helpful when radiographs are equivocal or unremarkable or when MR imaging is performed as the primary imaging modality in cases of FD.

Key Points

• Fibrous dysplasia displays a characteristic feature on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging: milk cloud appearance.
• Milk cloud appearance correlates well with the radiographic or CT finding of ground-glass appearance.
• Recognition of milk cloud appearance on contrast-enhanced MR imaging may be helpful when radiographs are equivocal or unremarkable or when MR imaging is performed as the primary imaging modality in cases of fibrous dysplasia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F (2013) WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th edn. IARC Press Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F (2013) WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th edn. IARC Press
2.
go back to reference DiCaprio MR, Enneking WF (2005) Fibrous dysplasia. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1848–1864PubMed DiCaprio MR, Enneking WF (2005) Fibrous dysplasia. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1848–1864PubMed
3.
go back to reference Forest M, Tomeno B, Vanel D (1998) Orthopedic surgical pathology: diagnosis of tumors and pseudotumoral lesions of bone and joints. Churchill Livingstone Forest M, Tomeno B, Vanel D (1998) Orthopedic surgical pathology: diagnosis of tumors and pseudotumoral lesions of bone and joints. Churchill Livingstone
5.
go back to reference Grabias SL, Campbell CJ (1977) Fibrous dysplasia. Orthop Clin North Am 8:771–783PubMed Grabias SL, Campbell CJ (1977) Fibrous dysplasia. Orthop Clin North Am 8:771–783PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schwartz DT, Alpert M (1964) The malignant transformation of fibrous dysplasia. Am J Med Sci 247:1–20CrossRefPubMed Schwartz DT, Alpert M (1964) The malignant transformation of fibrous dysplasia. Am J Med Sci 247:1–20CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jee WH, Choi KH, Choe BY, Park JM, Shinn KS (1996) Fibrous dysplasia: MR imaging characteristics with radiopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1523–1527CrossRefPubMed Jee WH, Choi KH, Choe BY, Park JM, Shinn KS (1996) Fibrous dysplasia: MR imaging characteristics with radiopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1523–1527CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Utz JA, Kransdorf MJ, Jelinek JS, Moser RP Jr, Berrey BH (1989) MR appearance of fibrous dysplasia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:845–851CrossRefPubMed Utz JA, Kransdorf MJ, Jelinek JS, Moser RP Jr, Berrey BH (1989) MR appearance of fibrous dysplasia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:845–851CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fisher AJ, Totty WG, Kyriakos M (1994) MR appearance of cystic fibrous dysplasia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:315–318CrossRefPubMed Fisher AJ, Totty WG, Kyriakos M (1994) MR appearance of cystic fibrous dysplasia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:315–318CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick KA, Taljanovic MS, Speer DP et al (2004) Imaging findings of fibrous dysplasia with histopathologic and intraoperative correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1389–1398CrossRef Fitzpatrick KA, Taljanovic MS, Speer DP et al (2004) Imaging findings of fibrous dysplasia with histopathologic and intraoperative correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1389–1398CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shah ZK, Peh WC, Koh WL, Shek TW (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of fibrous dysplasia. Br J Radiol 78:1104–1115CrossRefPubMed Shah ZK, Peh WC, Koh WL, Shek TW (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of fibrous dysplasia. Br J Radiol 78:1104–1115CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Parekh SG, Donthineni-Rao R, Ricchetti E, Lackman RD (2004) Fibrous dysplasia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:305–313CrossRefPubMed Parekh SG, Donthineni-Rao R, Ricchetti E, Lackman RD (2004) Fibrous dysplasia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:305–313CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Tokano H, Sugimoto T, Noguchi Y, Kitamura K (2001) Sequential computed tomography images demonstrating characteristic changes in fibrous dysplasia. J Laryngol Otol 115:757–759PubMed Tokano H, Sugimoto T, Noguchi Y, Kitamura K (2001) Sequential computed tomography images demonstrating characteristic changes in fibrous dysplasia. J Laryngol Otol 115:757–759PubMed
17.
go back to reference Riminucci M, Liu B, Corsi A et al (1999) The histopathology of fibrous dysplasia of bone in patients with activating mutations of the Gs alpha gene: site-specific patterns and recurrent histological hallmarks. J Pathol 187:249–258CrossRef Riminucci M, Liu B, Corsi A et al (1999) The histopathology of fibrous dysplasia of bone in patients with activating mutations of the Gs alpha gene: site-specific patterns and recurrent histological hallmarks. J Pathol 187:249–258CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Riminucci M, Saggio I, Robey PG, Bianco P (2006) Fibrous dysplasia as a stem cell disease. J Bone Miner Res 21(Suppl 2):P125–P131CrossRef Riminucci M, Saggio I, Robey PG, Bianco P (2006) Fibrous dysplasia as a stem cell disease. J Bone Miner Res 21(Suppl 2):P125–P131CrossRef
19.
go back to reference de Souza Faloni AP, Schoenmaker T, Azari A et al (2011) Jaw and long bone marrows have a different osteoclastogenic potential. Calcif Tissue Int 88:63–74CrossRefPubMed de Souza Faloni AP, Schoenmaker T, Azari A et al (2011) Jaw and long bone marrows have a different osteoclastogenic potential. Calcif Tissue Int 88:63–74CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Milk cloud appearance—a characteristic sign of fibrous dysplasia on contrast-enhanced MR imaging
Authors
Daniela Franz
Judith Wechselberger
Michael Rasper
Katja Specht
Victoria Kehl
Ernst J. Rummeny
Klaus Woertler
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06245-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

European Radiology 7/2019 Go to the issue