Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2016

01-12-2016 | Chest

Submillisievert CT using model-based iterative reconstruction with lung-specific setting: An initial phantom study

Authors: Akinori Hata, Masahiro Yanagawa, Osamu Honda, Tomoko Gyobu, Ken Ueda, Noriyuki Tomiyama

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess image quality of filtered back-projection (FBP) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) with a conventional setting and a new lung-specific setting on submillisievert CT.

Methods

A lung phantom with artificial nodules was scanned with 10 mA at 120 kVp and 80 kVp (0.14 mSv and 0.05 mSv, respectively); images were reconstructed using FBP and MBIR with conventional setting (MBIRStnd) and lung-specific settings (MBIRRP20/Tx and MBIRRP20). Three observers subjectively scored overall image quality and image findings on a 5-point scale (1 = worst, 5 = best) compared with reference standard images (50 mA-FBP at 120, 100, 80 kVp). Image noise was measured objectively.

Results

MBIRRP20/Tx performed significantly better than MBIRStnd for overall image quality in 80-kVp images (p < 0.01), blurring of the border between lung and chest wall in 120p-kVp images (p < 0.05) and the ventral area of 80-kVp images (p < 0.001), and clarity of small vessels in the ventral area of 80-kVp images (p = 0.037). At 120 kVp, 10 mA-MBIRRP20 and 10 mA-MBIRRP20/Tx showed similar performance to 50 mA-FBP. MBIRStnd was better for noise reduction. Except for blurring in 120 kVp-MBIRStnd, MBIRs performed better than FBP.

Conclusion

Although a conventional setting was advantageous in noise reduction, a lung-specific setting can provide more appropriate image quality, even on submillisievert CT.

Key Points

• Lung-specific submillisievert 10 mA-MBIR CT setting has similar performance to 50 mA-FBP
• The new lung-specific settings improve vessel clarity and blurring of borders
• The new settings may provide more appropriate images than conventional settings
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A et al (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199CrossRefPubMed Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A et al (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rampinelli C, Origgi D, Vecchi V et al (2015) Ultra-low-dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): detection of ground-glass nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom study. Radiol Med 120:611–617 Rampinelli C, Origgi D, Vecchi V et al (2015) Ultra-low-dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): detection of ground-glass nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom study. Radiol Med 120:611–617
3.
go back to reference Haggerty JE, Smith EA, Kunisaki SM, Dillman JR (2015) CT imaging of congenital lung lesions: effect of iterative reconstruction on diagnostic performance and radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 45:989–997CrossRefPubMed Haggerty JE, Smith EA, Kunisaki SM, Dillman JR (2015) CT imaging of congenital lung lesions: effect of iterative reconstruction on diagnostic performance and radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 45:989–997CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22:1613–1623CrossRefPubMed Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22:1613–1623CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study. Investig Radiol 47:482–489CrossRef Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study. Investig Radiol 47:482–489CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yanagawa M, Gyobu T, Leung AN et al (2014) Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality. Acad Radiol 21:695–703CrossRefPubMed Yanagawa M, Gyobu T, Leung AN et al (2014) Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality. Acad Radiol 21:695–703CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Notohamiprodjo S, Deak Z, Meurer F et al (2014) Image quality of iterative reconstruction in cranial CT imaging: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR). Eur Radiol 25:140–146 Notohamiprodjo S, Deak Z, Meurer F et al (2014) Image quality of iterative reconstruction in cranial CT imaging: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR). Eur Radiol 25:140–146
8.
go back to reference Hérin E, Gardavaud F, Chiaradia M et al (2015) Use of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose CT for routine follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma: dose savings, image quality and phantom study. Eur Radiol 25:2362–2370 Hérin E, Gardavaud F, Chiaradia M et al (2015) Use of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose CT for routine follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma: dose savings, image quality and phantom study. Eur Radiol 25:2362–2370
10.
go back to reference Widmann G, Schullian P, Gassner E-M et al (2015) Ultralow-dose CT of the craniofacial bone for navigated surgery using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction: 2D and 3D image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:563–569CrossRefPubMed Widmann G, Schullian P, Gassner E-M et al (2015) Ultralow-dose CT of the craniofacial bone for navigated surgery using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction: 2D and 3D image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:563–569CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH et al (2012) Abdominal CT with Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. Am J Roentgenol 199:1266–1274CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH et al (2012) Abdominal CT with Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. Am J Roentgenol 199:1266–1274CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lubner MG, Pooler BD, Kitchin DR et al (2015) Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging. Eur Radiol 25:2089–2102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lubner MG, Pooler BD, Kitchin DR et al (2015) Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging. Eur Radiol 25:2089–2102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Fontarensky M, Alfidja A, Perignon R et al (2015) Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic. Radiology 276:156–166CrossRefPubMed Fontarensky M, Alfidja A, Perignon R et al (2015) Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic. Radiology 276:156–166CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shampain KL, Davenport MS, Cohan RH et al (2015) Effect of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on CT Number Measurements Within Small (10-29 mm) Low-Attenuation Renal Masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:85–89CrossRefPubMed Shampain KL, Davenport MS, Cohan RH et al (2015) Effect of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on CT Number Measurements Within Small (10-29 mm) Low-Attenuation Renal Masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:85–89CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Boudabbous S, Arditi D, Paulin E et al (2015) Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) for the Reduction of Metal Artifacts on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:380–385CrossRefPubMed Boudabbous S, Arditi D, Paulin E et al (2015) Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) for the Reduction of Metal Artifacts on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:380–385CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vardhanabhuti V, James J, Nensey R et al (2015) Model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose CT colonography-feasibility study in 65 patients for symptomatic investigation. Acad Radiol 22:563–571CrossRefPubMed Vardhanabhuti V, James J, Nensey R et al (2015) Model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose CT colonography-feasibility study in 65 patients for symptomatic investigation. Acad Radiol 22:563–571CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Annoni AD, Andreini D, Pontone G et al (2015) Ultra-low-dose CT for left atrium and pulmonary veins imaging using new model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:1366–1373 Annoni AD, Andreini D, Pontone G et al (2015) Ultra-low-dose CT for left atrium and pulmonary veins imaging using new model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:1366–1373
18.
go back to reference Padole A, Singh S, Ackman JB et al (2014) Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:772–781CrossRefPubMed Padole A, Singh S, Ackman JB et al (2014) Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:772–781CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Goldman LW (2007) Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol 35:213–225CrossRefPubMed Goldman LW (2007) Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol 35:213–225CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Christe A, Torrente JC, Lin M et al (2011) CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:623–630CrossRefPubMed Christe A, Torrente JC, Lin M et al (2011) CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:623–630CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR et al (2009) A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:445–453CrossRefPubMed Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR et al (2009) A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:445–453CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Boehm T, Willmann JK, Hilfiker PR et al (2003) Thin-section CT of the lung: does electrocardiographic triggering influence diagnosis? Radiology 229:483–491CrossRefPubMed Boehm T, Willmann JK, Hilfiker PR et al (2003) Thin-section CT of the lung: does electrocardiographic triggering influence diagnosis? Radiology 229:483–491CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Mayo JR, Webb WR, Gould R et al (1987) High-resolution CT of the lungs: an optimal approach. Radiology 163:507–510CrossRefPubMed Mayo JR, Webb WR, Gould R et al (1987) High-resolution CT of the lungs: an optimal approach. Radiology 163:507–510CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Murata K, Khan A, Rojas KA, Herman PG (1988) Optimization of computed tomography technique to demonstrate the fine structure of the lung. Investig Radiol 23:170–175CrossRef Murata K, Khan A, Rojas KA, Herman PG (1988) Optimization of computed tomography technique to demonstrate the fine structure of the lung. Investig Radiol 23:170–175CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mathieu KB, Ali H, Fox PS et al (2014) Radiation dose reduction for CT lung cancer screening using ASIR and MBIR: a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15:4515PubMed Mathieu KB, Ali H, Fox PS et al (2014) Radiation dose reduction for CT lung cancer screening using ASIR and MBIR: a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15:4515PubMed
Metadata
Title
Submillisievert CT using model-based iterative reconstruction with lung-specific setting: An initial phantom study
Authors
Akinori Hata
Masahiro Yanagawa
Osamu Honda
Tomoko Gyobu
Ken Ueda
Noriyuki Tomiyama
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4307-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

European Radiology 12/2016 Go to the issue