Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2012

01-08-2012 | Computed Tomography

Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique

Authors: Masaki Katsura, Izuru Matsuda, Masaaki Akahane, Jiro Sato, Hiroyuki Akai, Koichiro Yasaka, Akira Kunimatsu, Kuni Ohtomo

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To prospectively evaluate dose reduction and image quality characteristics of chest CT reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).

Methods

One hundred patients underwent reference-dose and low-dose unenhanced chest CT with 64-row multidetector CT. Images were reconstructed with 50 % ASIR-filtered back projection blending (ASIR50) for reference-dose CT, and with ASIR50 and MBIR for low-dose CT. Two radiologists assessed the images in a blinded manner for subjective image noise, artefacts and diagnostic acceptability. Objective image noise was measured in the lung parenchyma. Data were analysed using the sign test and pair-wise Student’s t-test.

Results

Compared with reference-dose CT, there was a 79.0 % decrease in dose–length product with low-dose CT. Low-dose MBIR images had significantly lower objective image noise (16.93 ± 3.00) than low-dose ASIR (49.24 ± 9.11, P < 0.01) and reference-dose ASIR images (24.93 ± 4.65, P < 0.01). Low-dose MBIR images were all diagnostically acceptable. Unique features of low-dose MBIR images included motion artefacts and pixellated blotchy appearances, which did not adversely affect diagnostic acceptability.

Conclusion

Diagnostically acceptable chest CT images acquired with nearly 80 % less radiation can be obtained using MBIR. MBIR shows greater potential than ASIR for providing diagnostically acceptable low-dose CT images without severely compromising image quality.

Key Points

Model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) creates high-quality low-dose CT images.
MBIR significantly improves image noise and artefacts over adaptive statistical iterative techniques.
MBIR shows greater potential than ASIR for diagnostically acceptable low-dose CT.
The prolonged processing time of MBIR may currently limit its routine use in clinical practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schauer DA, Linton OW (2009) NCRP report no. 160, ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, medical exposure—are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys 97:1–5PubMedCrossRef Schauer DA, Linton OW (2009) NCRP report no. 160, ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, medical exposure—are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys 97:1–5PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE et al (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284PubMedCrossRef Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE et al (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: Frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources – 1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: Frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources – 1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Nicolas V (2007) Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: Prospective randomized study. Radiology 245:577–583PubMedCrossRef Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Nicolas V (2007) Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: Prospective randomized study. Radiology 245:577–583PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Diel J, Perlmutter S, Venkataramanan N, Mueller R, Lane MJ, Katz DS (2000) Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: An effective technique for radiation dose reduction? J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:795–801PubMedCrossRef Diel J, Perlmutter S, Venkataramanan N, Mueller R, Lane MJ, Katz DS (2000) Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: An effective technique for radiation dose reduction? J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:795–801PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV et al (2003) Low-dose CT of the abdomen: Evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. Radiology 228:251–256PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV et al (2003) Low-dose CT of the abdomen: Evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. Radiology 228:251–256PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: Feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764–771PubMedCrossRef Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: Feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764–771PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:126–131PubMedCrossRef Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:126–131PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: Assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: Assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR (2010) A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1095–1099PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR (2010) A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1095–1099PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR et al (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: Initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:40–45PubMedCrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR et al (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: Initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:40–45PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK et al (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45:202–210PubMedCrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK et al (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45:202–210PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q (2010) Abdominal CT: Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719PubMedCrossRef Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q (2010) Abdominal CT: Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD et al (2011) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: A pilot study. Radiology 259:565–573PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD et al (2011) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: A pilot study. Radiology 259:565–573PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J et al (2010) Abdominal CT: Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257:373–383PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J et al (2010) Abdominal CT: Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257:373–383PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cornfeld D, Israel G, Detroy E, Bokhari J, Mojibian H (2011) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W336–W340PubMedCrossRef Cornfeld D, Israel G, Detroy E, Bokhari J, Mojibian H (2011) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W336–W340PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yu Z, Thibault JB, Bouman CA, Sauer KD, Hsieh J (2011) Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogeneous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process 20:161–175PubMedCrossRef Yu Z, Thibault JB, Bouman CA, Sauer KD, Hsieh J (2011) Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogeneous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process 20:161–175PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Strub WM, Weiss KL, Sun D (2007) Hybrid reconstruction kernel: Optimized chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W115–W116PubMedCrossRef Strub WM, Weiss KL, Sun D (2007) Hybrid reconstruction kernel: Optimized chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W115–W116PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Weiss KL, Cornelius RS, Greeley AL et al (2011) Hybrid convolution kernel: Optimized CT of the head, neck, and spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:403–406PubMedCrossRef Weiss KL, Cornelius RS, Greeley AL et al (2011) Hybrid convolution kernel: Optimized CT of the head, neck, and spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:403–406PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Prakash P, Kalra MK, Ackman JB et al (2010) Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology 256:261–269PubMedCrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Ackman JB et al (2010) Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology 256:261–269PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253PubMedCrossRef National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980PubMedCrossRef Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique
Authors
Masaki Katsura
Izuru Matsuda
Masaaki Akahane
Jiro Sato
Hiroyuki Akai
Koichiro Yasaka
Akira Kunimatsu
Kuni Ohtomo
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2452-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2012

European Radiology 8/2012 Go to the issue