Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Musculoskeletal

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma

Authors: T. De Coninck, L. Jans, G. Sys, W. Huysse, T. Verstraeten, R. Forsyth, B. Poffyn, K. Verstraete

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate benign from malignant cartilage tumours compared to standard MRI. To investigate whether a cutoff value could be determined to differentiate enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma (CS) more accurately.

Methods

One hundred six patients were included in this retrospective study: 75 with enchondromas (mean age = 41 years) and 31 with CS (mean age = 47 years). Within this population, a subgroup of patients was selected with the tumour arising in a long bone. At the time of diagnosis, the tumours were evaluated on MRI, including standard MRI, DCE-MRI, and region-of-interest (ROI) analysis to obtain information on tumour vascularisation and perfusion.

Results

The main cutoff value to differentiate enchondroma from CS contained a two-fold more relative enhancement compared with muscle, combined with a 4.5 (= 76°) slope value, with 100 % sensitivity and 63.3 % specificity. The prediction of CS diagnosis with DCE-MRI had 93.4 % accuracy. The accuracy of the standard MRI parameters was equal to the DCE-MRI parameters.

Conclusions

Standard MRI and DCE-MRI both play an important and complementary role in differentiating enchondroma from low-grade CS. A combination of both imaging techniques leads to the highest diagnostic accuracy for differentiating cartilaginous tumours.

Key Points

DCE-MRI plays an important role in differentiating benign from malignant cartilage tumours.
Retrospective study defined a threshold for 100 % detection of chondrosarcoma with DCE-MRI.
The threshold values were relative enhancement = 2 and slope = 4.5.
One hundred per cent chondrosarcoma detection corresponds with 36.7 % false-positive diagnosis of enchondroma.
Standard MRI is complementary to DCE-MRI in differentiating cartilaginous tumours.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, Bloem JL, Taminiau AH, van der Woude HJ (2000) Cartilaginous tumours: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 214:539–546PubMed Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, Bloem JL, Taminiau AH, van der Woude HJ (2000) Cartilaginous tumours: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 214:539–546PubMed
2.
go back to reference Geirnaerdt MJ, Hermans J, Bloem JL et al (1997) Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade I chondrosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1097–1104PubMedCrossRef Geirnaerdt MJ, Hermans J, Bloem JL et al (1997) Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade I chondrosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1097–1104PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT (1998) Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics 18:1213–1237PubMed Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT (1998) Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics 18:1213–1237PubMed
4.
go back to reference De Beuckeleer LHL, De Schepper AMA, Ramon F (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumours: is it useful or necessary? Skeletal Radiol 25:137–141PubMedCrossRef De Beuckeleer LHL, De Schepper AMA, Ramon F (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumours: is it useful or necessary? Skeletal Radiol 25:137–141PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Verstraete KL, De Deene Y, Roels H, Dierick A, Uyttendaele D, Kunnen M (1994) Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularisation and perfusion. Radiology 192:835–843PubMed Verstraete KL, De Deene Y, Roels H, Dierick A, Uyttendaele D, Kunnen M (1994) Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularisation and perfusion. Radiology 192:835–843PubMed
6.
go back to reference Tokuda O, Hayashi N, Taguchi K, Matsunaga N (2005) Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging of diseased vertebrae: analysis of three parameters and the distribution of the time-intensity curve patterns. Skeletal Radiol 34:632–638PubMedCrossRef Tokuda O, Hayashi N, Taguchi K, Matsunaga N (2005) Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging of diseased vertebrae: analysis of three parameters and the distribution of the time-intensity curve patterns. Skeletal Radiol 34:632–638PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Geirnaerdt MJ, Bloem JL, Eulderink F, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH (1993) Cartilaginous tumours: correlation of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology 186:813–817PubMed Geirnaerdt MJ, Bloem JL, Eulderink F, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH (1993) Cartilaginous tumours: correlation of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology 186:813–817PubMed
8.
go back to reference Murphey MD, Walker EA, Wilson AJ et al (2003) From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of primary chondrosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 23:1245PubMedCrossRef Murphey MD, Walker EA, Wilson AJ et al (2003) From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of primary chondrosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 23:1245PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn PC, Dijkstra SD et al (2008) The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. Oncologist 13:320–329PubMedCrossRef Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn PC, Dijkstra SD et al (2008) The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. Oncologist 13:320–329PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mohler DG, Chiu R, McCall DA, Avedian RS (2010) Curettage and cryosurgery for low-grade cartilage tumours is associated with low recurrence and high function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2765–2773PubMedCrossRef Mohler DG, Chiu R, McCall DA, Avedian RS (2010) Curettage and cryosurgery for low-grade cartilage tumours is associated with low recurrence and high function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2765–2773PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Verstraete KL, van der Woude HJ, Hogendoorn PC, De Deene Y, Kunnen M, Bloem JL (1996) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumours: basic principles and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 6:311–321PubMedCrossRef Verstraete KL, van der Woude HJ, Hogendoorn PC, De Deene Y, Kunnen M, Bloem JL (1996) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumours: basic principles and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 6:311–321PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Holscher HC, Bloem JL, van der Woude HJ et al (1995) Can MRI predict the histopathological response in patients with osteosarcoma after the first cycle of chemotherapy? Clin Radiol 50:384–390PubMedCrossRef Holscher HC, Bloem JL, van der Woude HJ et al (1995) Can MRI predict the histopathological response in patients with osteosarcoma after the first cycle of chemotherapy? Clin Radiol 50:384–390PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Douis H, Saifuddin A (2012) The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. I. Benign lesions. Skeletal Radiol 41:1195–1212PubMedCrossRef Douis H, Saifuddin A (2012) The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. I. Benign lesions. Skeletal Radiol 41:1195–1212PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Douis H, Saifuddin A (2013) The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. II. Chondrosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 42:611–626PubMedCrossRef Douis H, Saifuddin A (2013) The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. II. Chondrosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 42:611–626PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Landis R, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis R, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ferrer-Santacreu EM, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, González-López JM, Pérez Fernández E (2012) Enchondroma versus low-grade chondrosarcoma in appendicular skeleton: clinical and radiological criteria. J Oncology 2012:437958 Ferrer-Santacreu EM, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, González-López JM, Pérez Fernández E (2012) Enchondroma versus low-grade chondrosarcoma in appendicular skeleton: clinical and radiological criteria. J Oncology 2012:437958
19.
go back to reference Poffyn B, Sys G, Mulliez A et al (2011) Extracorporeally irradiated autografts for the treatment of bone tumours: tips and tricks. Int Orthop 35:889–895PubMedCrossRef Poffyn B, Sys G, Mulliez A et al (2011) Extracorporeally irradiated autografts for the treatment of bone tumours: tips and tricks. Int Orthop 35:889–895PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kendell SD, Collins MS, Adkins MC, Sundaram M, Unni KK (2004) Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula. Skeletal Radiol 33:458–466PubMedCrossRef Kendell SD, Collins MS, Adkins MC, Sundaram M, Unni KK (2004) Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula. Skeletal Radiol 33:458–466PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Woertler K (2003) Benign bone tumours and tumour-like lesions: value of cross-sectional imaging. Eur Radiol 13:1820–1835PubMedCrossRef Woertler K (2003) Benign bone tumours and tumour-like lesions: value of cross-sectional imaging. Eur Radiol 13:1820–1835PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Soldatos T, McCarthy EF, Attar S, Carrino JA, Fayad LM (2011) Imaging features of chondrosarcoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:504–511PubMedCrossRef Soldatos T, McCarthy EF, Attar S, Carrino JA, Fayad LM (2011) Imaging features of chondrosarcoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:504–511PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Collins MS, Koyama T, Swee RB, Inwards CY (2003) Clear cell chondrosarcoma: radiographic, computed tomographic, and magnetic resonance findings in 34 patients with pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol 32:687–694PubMedCrossRef Collins MS, Koyama T, Swee RB, Inwards CY (2003) Clear cell chondrosarcoma: radiographic, computed tomographic, and magnetic resonance findings in 34 patients with pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol 32:687–694PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kalil RK, Inwards CY, Unni KK et al (2000) Dedifferentiated clear cell chondrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 24:1079–1086PubMedCrossRef Kalil RK, Inwards CY, Unni KK et al (2000) Dedifferentiated clear cell chondrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 24:1079–1086PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma
Authors
T. De Coninck
L. Jans
G. Sys
W. Huysse
T. Verstraeten
R. Forsyth
B. Poffyn
K. Verstraete
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2913-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

European Radiology 11/2013 Go to the issue