Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Head and Neck

Non-ECG-gated unenhanced MRA of the carotids: Optimization and clinical feasibility

Authors: H. Raoult, J. Y. Gauvrit, P. Schmitt, V. Le Couls, E. Bannier

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To optimise and assess the clinical feasibility of a carotid non-ECG-gated unenhanced MRA sequence.

Methods

Sixteen healthy volunteers and 11 patients presenting with internal carotid artery (ICA) disease underwent large field-of-view balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) unenhanced MRA at 3T. Sampling schemes acquiring the k-space centre either early (kCE) or late (kCL) in the acquisition window were evaluated. Signal and image quality was scored in comparison to ECG-gated kCE unenhanced MRA and TOF. For patients, computed tomography angiography was used as the reference.

Results

In volunteers, kCE sampling yielded higher image quality than kCL and TOF, with fewer flow artefacts and improved signal homogeneity. kCE unenhanced MRA image quality was higher without ECG-gating. Arterial signal and artery/vein contrast were higher with both bSSFP sampling schemes than with TOF. The kCE sequence allowed correct quantification of ten significant stenoses, and it facilitated the identification of an infrapetrous dysplasia, which was outside of the TOF imaging coverage.

Conclusions

Non-ECG-gated bSSFP carotid imaging offers high-quality images and is a promising sequence for carotid disease diagnosis in a short acquisition time with high spatial resolution and a large field of view.

Key Points

• Non-ECG-gated unenhanced bSSFP MRA offers high-quality imaging of the carotid arteries.
• Sequences using early acquisition of the k-space centre achieve higher image quality.
• Non-ECG-gated unenhanced bSSFP MRA allows quantification of significant carotid stenosis.
• Short MR acquisition times and ungated sequences are helpful in clinical practice.
• High 3D spatial resolution and a large field of view improve diagnostic performance.
Literature
1.
Rothwell PM, Coull AJ, Silver LE et al (2005) Population-based study of event-rate, incidence, case fatality, and mortality for all acute vascular events in all arterial territories (Oxford Vascular Study). Lancet 366:1773–1783PubMedCrossRef
2.
Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Mandrekar JN et al (2007) Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 243:812–819PubMedCrossRef
3.
Clevert DA, Johnson T, Michaely H et al (2006) High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging. Eur J Radiol 60:379–386PubMedCrossRef
4.
Schernthaner R, Stadler A, Lomoschitz F et al (2008) Multidetector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses. Eur Radiol 18:665–671PubMedCrossRef
5.
Nael K, Villablanca JP, Pope WB et al (2007) Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T–highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view. Radiology 242:600–609PubMedCrossRef
6.
Gough MJ (2011) Preprocedural imaging strategies in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 54:1215–1218PubMedCrossRef
7.
Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y (2009) MRA for carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 40:e77, author reply e8PubMedCrossRef
8.
Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR et al (2007) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 243:148–157PubMedCrossRef
9.
Lummel N, Boeckh-Behrens T, Lutz J et al (2012) Evaluation of the supraaortic arteries using unenhanced velocity MR angiography "Inhance". Neuroradiology 54:1215–1219PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, Mali WP et al (2002) Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg 36:806–813PubMed
12.
Herborn CU, Watkins DM, Runge VM et al (2006) Renal arteries: comparison of steady-state free precession MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 239:263–268PubMedCrossRef
13.
Kramer H, Runge VM, Morelli JN et al (2011) Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of unenhanced and contrast enhanced techniques. Eur Radiol 21:1667–1676PubMedCrossRef
14.
Katoh M, Buecker A, Stuber M et al (2004) Free-breathing renal MR angiography with steady-state free-precession (SSFP) and slab-selective spin inversion: initial results. Kidney Int 66:1272–1278PubMedCrossRef
15.
Lanzman RS, Voiculescu A, Walther C et al (2009) ECG-gated nonenhanced 3D steady-state free precession MR angiography in assessment of transplant renal arteries: comparison with DSA. Radiology 252:914–921PubMedCrossRef
16.
Li W, Storey P, Chen Q et al (2004) Dark flow artefacts with steady-state free precession cine MR technique: causes and implications for cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 230:569–575PubMedCrossRef
17.
Miyazaki M, Akahane M (2012) Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: established techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1–19PubMedCrossRef
18.
Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962PubMedCrossRef
19.
Satogami N, Okada T, Koyama T et al (2009) Visualization of external carotid artery and its branches: unenhanced MR angiography using balanced steady-state free-precession sequence and a time-spatial labeling inversion pulse. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:678–683PubMedCrossRef
20.
Wheaton AJ, Miyazaki M (2012) Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: physical principles. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:286–304PubMedCrossRef
21.
Koktzoglou I, Gupta N, Edelman RR (2011) Nonenhanced extracranial carotid MR angiography using arterial spin labeling: improved performance with pseudocontinuous tagging. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:384–394PubMedCrossRef
22.
Takei N, Miyoshi M, Kabasawa H (2012) Noncontrast MR angiography for supraaortic arteries using inflow enhanced inversion recovery fast spin echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:957–962PubMedCrossRef
23.
Babiarz LS, Romero JM, Murphy EK et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining ≥70% internal carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:761–768PubMedCrossRef
24.
Debrey SM, Yu H, Lynch JK et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 39:2237–2248PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zavodni AE, Emery DJ, Wilman AH (2005) Performance of steady-state free precession for imaging carotid artery disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:86–90PubMedCrossRef
26.
Koktzoglou I, Edelman RR (2009) STAR and STARFIRE for flow-dependent and flow-independent noncontrast carotid angiography. Magn Reson Med 61:117–124PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Non-ECG-gated unenhanced MRA of the carotids: Optimization and clinical feasibility
Authors
H. Raoult
J. Y. Gauvrit
P. Schmitt
V. Le Couls
E. Bannier
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2931-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

European Radiology 11/2013 Go to the issue

Urogenital

Computed diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T: impact on image quality and tumour detection

Musculoskeletal

Lumbar facet joint injection: feasibility as an alternative method in high-risk patients

Computed Tomography

An optimised patient-specific approach to administration of contrast agent for CT pulmonary angiography

Interventional

Percutaneous lung biopsies: performance of an optical CT-based navigation system with a low-dose protocol

Musculoskeletal

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma

Magnetic Resonance

Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis