Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Computed Tomography

Effective dose estimates for cone beam computed tomography in interventional radiology

Authors: Y. M. Kwok, F. G. Irani, K. H. Tay, C. C. Yang, C. G. Padre, B. S. Tan

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To compare radiation doses in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with those of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) using manufacturers’ standard protocols.

Methods

Dose-levels in head and abdominal imaging were evaluated using a dosimetric phantom. Effective dose estimates were performed by placing thermoluminescent dosimeters in the phantom. Selected protocols for two CBCT systems and comparable protocols for one MDCT system were evaluated. Organ doses were measured and effective doses derived by applying the International Commission on Radiological Protection 2007 tissue weighting factors.

Results

Effective doses estimated for the head protocol were 4.4 and 5.4 mSv for the two CBCT systems respectively and 4.3 mSv for MDCT. Eye doses for one CBCT system and MDCT were comparable (173.6 and 148.4 mGy respectively) but significantly higher compared with the second CBCT (44.6 mGy). Two abdominal protocols were evaluated for each system; the effective doses estimated were 15.0 and 18.6 mSv, 25.4 and 37.0 mSv, and 9.8 and 13.5 mSv, respectively, for each of the CBCT and MDCT systems.

Conclusions

The study demonstrated comparable dose-levels for CBCT and MDCT systems in head studies, but higher dose levels for CBCT in abdominal studies. There was a significant difference in eye doses observed between the CBCT systems.

Key Points

• Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is increasingly utilised in interventional radiology.
• Effective doses for selected CBCT and MDCT protocols were estimated and compared.
• Dose levels in CBCT and MDCT were comparable for head studies.
• Dose levels were higher in CBCT for abdominal studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gupta R, Grasruck M, Suess et al (2006) Ultra high resolution flat panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture and system characterization. Eur Radiol 16:1191–1205PubMedCrossRef Gupta R, Grasruck M, Suess et al (2006) Ultra high resolution flat panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture and system characterization. Eur Radiol 16:1191–1205PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Paul J, Jacobi V, Farhang M, Bazrafshan B, Vogl TJ, Mbalisike EC (2012) Radiation dose and image quality of X-ray volume imaging systems: cone-beam computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography and digital fluoroscopy. Eur Radiol 23:1582–1593PubMedCrossRef Paul J, Jacobi V, Farhang M, Bazrafshan B, Vogl TJ, Mbalisike EC (2012) Radiation dose and image quality of X-ray volume imaging systems: cone-beam computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography and digital fluoroscopy. Eur Radiol 23:1582–1593PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD (2008) C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:814–820PubMedCrossRef Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD (2008) C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:814–820PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Davis SD, Ross CK, Mobit PN, Van der Zwan L, Chase WJ, Shortt KR (2003) The response of LiF thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV X-rays to 60Co gamma rays. Radiat Prot Dosim 106:33–43CrossRef Davis SD, Ross CK, Mobit PN, Van der Zwan L, Chase WJ, Shortt KR (2003) The response of LiF thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV X-rays to 60Co gamma rays. Radiat Prot Dosim 106:33–43CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mobit PN, Mayles P, Nahum AE (1996) The quality dependence of LiF TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments. Phys Med Biol 41:387–398PubMedCrossRef Mobit PN, Mayles P, Nahum AE (1996) The quality dependence of LiF TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments. Phys Med Biol 41:387–398PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB (2006) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:219–226PubMedCrossRef Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB (2006) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:219–226PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yasuda H (2009) Effective dose measured with a life size human phantom in a low earth orbit mission. J Radiat Res 50:89–96PubMedCrossRef Yasuda H (2009) Effective dose measured with a life size human phantom in a low earth orbit mission. J Radiat Res 50:89–96PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37 (2–4) International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37 (2–4)
9.
go back to reference White SC, Rose TC (1979) Absorbed bone marrow dose in certain dental radiographic techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 98:553–558PubMed White SC, Rose TC (1979) Absorbed bone marrow dose in certain dental radiographic techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 98:553–558PubMed
10.
go back to reference Martin CJ (2007) Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 80:639–647PubMedCrossRef Martin CJ (2007) Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 80:639–647PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brenner D, Huda W (2008) Effective dose: a useful concept in diagnostic radiology? Radiat Prot Dosim 128:503–508CrossRef Brenner D, Huda W (2008) Effective dose: a useful concept in diagnostic radiology? Radiat Prot Dosim 128:503–508CrossRef
12.
go back to reference McNitt-Gray MF (2002) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiographics 22:1541–1553PubMedCrossRef McNitt-Gray MF (2002) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiographics 22:1541–1553PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2010) Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures. Publication 116. Ann ICRP 40 (2–5) International Commission on Radiological Protection (2010) Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures. Publication 116. Ann ICRP 40 (2–5)
14.
go back to reference Aschan C (1999) Applicability of thermoluminescent dosimeters in X-ray organ dose determination and in the dosimetry of systemic and boron neutron capture radiotherapy. Academic Dissertation. University of Helsinki, Helsinki Aschan C (1999) Applicability of thermoluminescent dosimeters in X-ray organ dose determination and in the dosimetry of systemic and boron neutron capture radiotherapy. Academic Dissertation. University of Helsinki, Helsinki
15.
go back to reference Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR (2008) Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology 248:995–1003PubMedCrossRef Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR (2008) Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology 248:995–1003PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Groves AM, Owen KE, Courtney HM et al (2004) 16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation. Br J Radiol 77:662–665PubMedCrossRef Groves AM, Owen KE, Courtney HM et al (2004) 16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation. Br J Radiol 77:662–665PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Geleijns J, Van Unnik JG, Zoetelief J, Zweers D, Broerse JJ (1994) Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. Br J Radiol 67:360–365CrossRef Geleijns J, Van Unnik JG, Zoetelief J, Zweers D, Broerse JJ (1994) Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. Br J Radiol 67:360–365CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effective dose estimates for cone beam computed tomography in interventional radiology
Authors
Y. M. Kwok
F. G. Irani
K. H. Tay
C. C. Yang
C. G. Padre
B. S. Tan
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2934-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

European Radiology 11/2013 Go to the issue