Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Magnetic Resonance

Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis

Authors: Ayse Ahsen Bakan, Ercan Inci, Selim Bakan, Suut Gokturk, Tan Cimilli

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the usefulness of diffusion- weighted MRI (DWI) in the detection and staging of liver fibrosis and inflammation.

Methods

DWI was performed with b-factors of 0, 500 and 1000 s/mm². ADC values were obtained by placing circular regions of interest in four segments of the liver. Differences between the study (n = 34) and control groups’ (n = 25) ADC values were examined. Further, this study investigated if and how ADC values were related to fibrosis stages and histological activity index (HAI) scores.

Results

The mean ADC value of the liver was smaller in the study group compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Spearman rho correlation analyses showed lower ADC values were associated with higher fibrosis and HAI scores (P < 0.01). There were statistically significant differences in liver ADC values between each combination of fibrosis stages (e.g. stages 0 and 1, 0 and 2) except for stages 1 and 2.

Conclusions

ADC values prove to be a valuable technique for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and inflammation. They can also be useful in fibrosis staging, particularly in distinguishing later stages of fibrosis from intermediate and early stages.

Key Points

  • Diffusion Weighted MRI is a promising technique for diagnosis of liver fibrosis.
  • Apparent Diffusion Coefficients provide valuable information for staging of liver fibrosis.
  • DWI may offer alternative to biopsy for assessing liver fibrosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malekzadeh R, Mohamadnejad M, Nasseri-Moghaddam S et al (2004) Reversibility of cirrhosis in autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Med 117:125–129PubMedCrossRef Malekzadeh R, Mohamadnejad M, Nasseri-Moghaddam S et al (2004) Reversibility of cirrhosis in autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Med 117:125–129PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wanless IR, Nakashima E, Sherman M (2000) Regression of human cirrhosis: morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:1599–1607PubMed Wanless IR, Nakashima E, Sherman M (2000) Regression of human cirrhosis: morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:1599–1607PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dufour JF, DeLellis R, Kaplan MM (1998) Regression of hepatic fibrosis in hepatitis C with long-term interferon treatment. Dig Dis Sci 43:2573–2576PubMedCrossRef Dufour JF, DeLellis R, Kaplan MM (1998) Regression of hepatic fibrosis in hepatitis C with long-term interferon treatment. Dig Dis Sci 43:2573–2576PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rambaldi A, Gluud C (2005) Colchicine for alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD002148PubMed Rambaldi A, Gluud C (2005) Colchicine for alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD002148PubMed
5.
go back to reference Safadi R, Zigmond E, Pappo O, Shalev Z, Ilan Y (2007) Amelioration of hepatic fibrosis via beta-glucosyl- ceramide-mediated immune modulation is associated with altered CD8 and NKT lymphocyte distribution. Int Immunol 19:1021–1029PubMedCrossRef Safadi R, Zigmond E, Pappo O, Shalev Z, Ilan Y (2007) Amelioration of hepatic fibrosis via beta-glucosyl- ceramide-mediated immune modulation is associated with altered CD8 and NKT lymphocyte distribution. Int Immunol 19:1021–1029PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Berg T, Sarrazin C, Hinrichsen H et al (2004) Does non-invasive staging of fibrosis challenge liver biopsy as a gold standard in chronic hepatitis C? Hepatology 39:1456–1457PubMedCrossRef Berg T, Sarrazin C, Hinrichsen H et al (2004) Does non-invasive staging of fibrosis challenge liver biopsy as a gold standard in chronic hepatitis C? Hepatology 39:1456–1457PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Afdhal NH, Nunes D (2004) Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1160–1174PubMedCrossRef Afdhal NH, Nunes D (2004) Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1160–1174PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B et al (2007) FIB- 4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection—comparison with liver biopsy and FibroTest. Hepatology 46:32–36PubMedCrossRef Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B et al (2007) FIB- 4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection—comparison with liver biopsy and FibroTest. Hepatology 46:32–36PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A et al (2005) Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 41:48–54PubMedCrossRef Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A et al (2005) Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 41:48–54PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rouvire O, Yin M, Dresner MA et al (2006) MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology 240:440–448CrossRef Rouvire O, Yin M, Dresner MA et al (2006) MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology 240:440–448CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J et al (2005) Prospective comparison of transient elastography, FibroTest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 128:343–350PubMedCrossRef Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J et al (2005) Prospective comparison of transient elastography, FibroTest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 128:343–350PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Annet L, Materne R, Danse E, Jamart J, Horsmans Y, Van Beers BE (2003) Hepatic flow parameters measured with MR imaging and Doppler US: correlations with degree of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Radiology 229:409–414PubMedCrossRef Annet L, Materne R, Danse E, Jamart J, Horsmans Y, Van Beers BE (2003) Hepatic flow parameters measured with MR imaging and Doppler US: correlations with degree of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Radiology 229:409–414PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hagiwara M, Rusinek H, Lee VS et al (2008) Quantification of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease using 3D perfusion-weighted MR imaging: preliminary experience. Radiology 246:926–934PubMedCrossRef Hagiwara M, Rusinek H, Lee VS et al (2008) Quantification of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease using 3D perfusion-weighted MR imaging: preliminary experience. Radiology 246:926–934PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R, Nievelstein RA, Luijten PR (2008) Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology. Eur Radiol 18:1937–1952PubMedCrossRef Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R, Nievelstein RA, Luijten PR (2008) Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology. Eur Radiol 18:1937–1952PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kele PG, van der Jagt EJ (2010) Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver. World J Gastroenterol 16:1567–1576PubMedCrossRef Kele PG, van der Jagt EJ (2010) Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver. World J Gastroenterol 16:1567–1576PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Muraoka N, Uematsu H, Kimura H et al (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer: characterisation and histopathological correlations. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:1302–1308PubMedCrossRef Muraoka N, Uematsu H, Kimura H et al (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer: characterisation and histopathological correlations. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:1302–1308PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H et al (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15:71–78PubMedCrossRef Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H et al (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15:71–78PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Cimilli T (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of primary solid and cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.024 Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Cimilli T (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of primary solid and cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2011.​02.​024
20.
go back to reference Inci E, Kilickesmez O, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Bayramoglu S, Cimilli T (2011) Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol 21:768PubMedCrossRef Inci E, Kilickesmez O, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Bayramoglu S, Cimilli T (2011) Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol 21:768PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Girometti R, Furlan A, Bazzocchi M et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhotic patients. Radiol Med 112:394–408PubMedCrossRef Girometti R, Furlan A, Bazzocchi M et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhotic patients. Radiol Med 112:394–408PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2006) Evaluation of hepatic lesions and hepatic parenchyma using diffusion weighted echo-planar MR with three values of gradient b-factor. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:637–645PubMedCrossRef Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2006) Evaluation of hepatic lesions and hepatic parenchyma using diffusion weighted echo-planar MR with three values of gradient b-factor. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:637–645PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1997) Focal liver masses: characterisation with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744PubMed Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1997) Focal liver masses: characterisation with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744PubMed
24.
go back to reference Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:397–402PubMed Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:397–402PubMed
25.
go back to reference Taouli B, Tolia AJ, Losada M et al (2007) Diffusion weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:799–806PubMedCrossRef Taouli B, Tolia AJ, Losada M et al (2007) Diffusion weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:799–806PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lewin M, Poujol-Robert A, Boelle PY et al (2007) Diffusion- weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 46:658–665PubMedCrossRef Lewin M, Poujol-Robert A, Boelle PY et al (2007) Diffusion- weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 46:658–665PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sandrasegaran K, Akışık FM, Lin C, Tahir B, Rajan J, Saxena R, Aisen AM (2009) Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1556–60PubMedCrossRef Sandrasegaran K, Akışık FM, Lin C, Tahir B, Rajan J, Saxena R, Aisen AM (2009) Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1556–60PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Soylu A, Kılıçkesmez Ö, Poturoğlu Ş, Dolapçıoğlu C, Serez K, Sevindir İ, Yaşar N, Akyıldız M, Kumbasar B (2010) Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic active hepatitis. Diagn Interv Radiol 16:204–208PubMed Soylu A, Kılıçkesmez Ö, Poturoğlu Ş, Dolapçıoğlu C, Serez K, Sevindir İ, Yaşar N, Akyıldız M, Kumbasar B (2010) Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic active hepatitis. Diagn Interv Radiol 16:204–208PubMed
29.
go back to reference Koinuma M, Ohashi I, Hanafusa K, Shibuya H (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:80–85PubMedCrossRef Koinuma M, Ohashi I, Hanafusa K, Shibuya H (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:80–85PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Boulanger Y, Amara M, Lepanto L et al (2003) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver of hepatitis C patients. NMR Biomed 16:132–136PubMedCrossRef Boulanger Y, Amara M, Lepanto L et al (2003) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver of hepatitis C patients. NMR Biomed 16:132–136PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Knodell RG, Ishak KG, Black WC et al (1981) Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology 1:431–435PubMedCrossRef Knodell RG, Ishak KG, Black WC et al (1981) Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology 1:431–435PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis
Authors
Ayse Ahsen Bakan
Ercan Inci
Selim Bakan
Suut Gokturk
Tan Cimilli
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2295-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

European Radiology 3/2012 Go to the issue