Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Pancreatic Cancer | Original Scientific Report

Twelve Hundred Consecutive Pancreato-Duodenectomies from Single Centre: Impact of Centre of Excellence on Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Across India

Authors: Shailesh V. Shrikhande, Rajesh S. Shinde, Vikram A. Chaudhari, Sagar R. Kurunkar, Ashwin L. Desouza, Vandana Agarwal, Manish S. Bhandare

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pancreato-duodenectomy (PD) is a technically challenging operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Over the period of time, Tata Memorial Centre has evolved into a high-volume centre for management of pancreatic cancer. Aim of this study is to report the short- and long-term outcomes of 1200 consecutive PDs performed at single tertiary cancer centre in India.

Methods

1200 PDs were performed from 1992 to 2017. Prospectively maintained database was used to retrospectively assess the short- and long-term outcomes.

Results

Study cohort was divided into periods A and B (500 and 700 patients, respectively). Both groups were comparable for demographic variables. Overall morbidity and mortality in entire cohort were 31.2% and 3.9%, respectively. Period B documented significant reduction in post-operative mortality (5.4% vs 2.8%), post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (5.8% vs 3%) and bile leaks (3.4% vs 1.3%). However, incidence of delayed gastric emptying and clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula was higher in period B. With median follow-up of 25 months, 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival for patients with pancreatic cancer were 43.7% and 38.7%, respectively, and that for periampullary tumours were 65.9% and 59.4%, respectively. Period B also corresponded with dissemination of technical expertise across diverse regions of India with specialised training of 35 surgeons.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of delivering high-quality care in a dedicated high-volume centre even in a country with low incidence of pancreatic cancer with marked disparities in medical care and socio-economic conditions. Improved outcomes underscore the need to promote regionalisation via a dedicated training programme.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson K, Mack T, Silverman D (2018) Cancer of the pancreas. In: Cancer epidemiology and prevention. Oxford University Press; ISBN: 9780190238667 Anderson K, Mack T, Silverman D (2018) Cancer of the pancreas. In: Cancer epidemiology and prevention. Oxford University Press; ISBN: 9780190238667
2.
go back to reference Salim EI, Moore MA, Bener A et al (2010) Cancer epidemiology in South-West Asia—past, present and future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 11(Suupl 2):33–48PubMed Salim EI, Moore MA, Bener A et al (2010) Cancer epidemiology in South-West Asia—past, present and future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 11(Suupl 2):33–48PubMed
4.
go back to reference Dal Molin M, Zhang M, de Wilde RF et al (2015) Very long term survival following resection for pancreatic cancer is not explained by commonly mutated genes: results of whole-exome sequencing analysis. Clin Cancer Res 21:1944–1950PubMedCentral Dal Molin M, Zhang M, de Wilde RF et al (2015) Very long term survival following resection for pancreatic cancer is not explained by commonly mutated genes: results of whole-exome sequencing analysis. Clin Cancer Res 21:1944–1950PubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN et al (1997) Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 125:250–256 Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN et al (1997) Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 125:250–256
6.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257PubMedPubMedCentral Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:10–15PubMedPubMedCentral Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:10–15PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2006) Periampullary and pancreatic incidentaloma: a single institution’s experience with an increasingly common diagnosis. Ann Surg 243:673–680PubMedPubMedCentral Winter JM, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2006) Periampullary and pancreatic incidentaloma: a single institution’s experience with an increasingly common diagnosis. Ann Surg 243:673–680PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S et al (1997) Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK pancreatic cancer group. Br J Surg 84:1370–1376PubMed Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S et al (1997) Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK pancreatic cancer group. Br J Surg 84:1370–1376PubMed
10.
go back to reference Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2006) Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up. Surgery 140:764–772PubMed Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2006) Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up. Surgery 140:764–772PubMed
11.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 10:1199–1210PubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 10:1199–1210PubMed
12.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Somashekar BA et al (2013) Evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy in a tertiary cancer center in India: improved results from service reconfiguration. Pancreatology 13:63–71PubMed Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Somashekar BA et al (2013) Evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy in a tertiary cancer center in India: improved results from service reconfiguration. Pancreatology 13:63–71PubMed
13.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Barreto G, Shukla PJ (2008) Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:87–91PubMed Shrikhande SV, Barreto G, Shukla PJ (2008) Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:87–91PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bal M, Rane S, Talole S et al (2018) Tumour origin and R1 rates in pancreatic resections: towards consilience in pathology reporting. Virchows Arch 473:293–303PubMed Bal M, Rane S, Talole S et al (2018) Tumour origin and R1 rates in pancreatic resections: towards consilience in pathology reporting. Virchows Arch 473:293–303PubMed
15.
go back to reference Kimmings AN, van Deventer SJ, Obertop H et al (2000) Endotoxin, cytokines, and endotoxin binding proteins in obstructive jaundice and after preoperative biliary drainage. Gut 46:725–731PubMedPubMedCentral Kimmings AN, van Deventer SJ, Obertop H et al (2000) Endotoxin, cytokines, and endotoxin binding proteins in obstructive jaundice and after preoperative biliary drainage. Gut 46:725–731PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Isenberg G, Gouma DJ et al (2002) The ongoing debate about preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 56:310–315PubMed Isenberg G, Gouma DJ et al (2002) The ongoing debate about preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 56:310–315PubMed
17.
go back to reference Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shrikhande SV et al (2005) Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:356–361PubMed Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shrikhande SV et al (2005) Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:356–361PubMed
18.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Sivasankar M, Vollmer CM et al (2017) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 161:1221–1234PubMed Shrikhande SV, Sivasankar M, Vollmer CM et al (2017) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 161:1221–1234PubMed
19.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMed
20.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591PubMed Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMed
22.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Post pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Post pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M et al (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155:977–988PubMed Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M et al (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155:977–988PubMed
24.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Sanjay P, Takaori K, Govil S et al (2012) Artery first approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 99:1027–1035PubMed Sanjay P, Takaori K, Govil S et al (2012) Artery first approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 99:1027–1035PubMed
26.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Bodhankar YD et al (2011) Superior mesenteric artery first combined with uncinate process approach versus uncinate process first approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparative study evaluating perioperative outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1205–1212PubMed Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Bodhankar YD et al (2011) Superior mesenteric artery first combined with uncinate process approach versus uncinate process first approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparative study evaluating perioperative outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1205–1212PubMed
27.
go back to reference Mitra A, Pai E, Dusane R et al (2018) Extended pancreatectomy as defined by the ISGPS: useful in selected cases of pancreatic cancer but invaluable in other complex pancreatic tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 403:203–212PubMed Mitra A, Pai E, Dusane R et al (2018) Extended pancreatectomy as defined by the ISGPS: useful in selected cases of pancreatic cancer but invaluable in other complex pancreatic tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 403:203–212PubMed
28.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG (2010) Extended pancreatic resections and lymphadenectomy: an appraisal of the current evidence. World J Gastrointest Surg 2:39–46PubMedPubMedCentral Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG (2010) Extended pancreatic resections and lymphadenectomy: an appraisal of the current evidence. World J Gastrointest Surg 2:39–46PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Kumar NAN, Bhandare MS, Chaudhari V et al (2019) Analysis of 50 cases of solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas: aggressive surgical resection provides excellent outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:187–191PubMed Kumar NAN, Bhandare MS, Chaudhari V et al (2019) Analysis of 50 cases of solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas: aggressive surgical resection provides excellent outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:187–191PubMed
30.
go back to reference Ironside N, Barreto SG, Loveday B et al (2018) Meta-analysis of an artery-first approach versus standard pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes and survival. Br J Surg 105:628–636PubMed Ironside N, Barreto SG, Loveday B et al (2018) Meta-analysis of an artery-first approach versus standard pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes and survival. Br J Surg 105:628–636PubMed
31.
go back to reference Batra S, Suradkar K, Talole S et al (2016) Major gastrointestinal cancer resections in the elderly in India: poised for future challenges. Dig Surg 33(146–1):56 Batra S, Suradkar K, Talole S et al (2016) Major gastrointestinal cancer resections in the elderly in India: poised for future challenges. Dig Surg 33(146–1):56
32.
go back to reference Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schimied BM et al (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection, towards the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314PubMed Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schimied BM et al (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection, towards the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314PubMed
33.
go back to reference El Nakeeb A, Askar W, Atef E et al (2017) Trends and outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: a 25-year single-centre study of 1000 consecutive cases. World J Gastroenterol 23:7025–7036PubMedPubMedCentral El Nakeeb A, Askar W, Atef E et al (2017) Trends and outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: a 25-year single-centre study of 1000 consecutive cases. World J Gastroenterol 23:7025–7036PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference De Pastena M, Marchegiani G, Paiella S et al (2018) Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 1500 consecutive cases. Dig Endosc 30:777–784PubMed De Pastena M, Marchegiani G, Paiella S et al (2018) Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 1500 consecutive cases. Dig Endosc 30:777–784PubMed
35.
go back to reference Van Roessel S, Mackay TM, Tol JAMG et al (2019) Impact of expanding indications on surgical and oncological outcome in 1434 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies. HPB (Oxford) 21:865–875 Van Roessel S, Mackay TM, Tol JAMG et al (2019) Impact of expanding indications on surgical and oncological outcome in 1434 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies. HPB (Oxford) 21:865–875
36.
go back to reference He J, Ahuja N, Makary NA et al (2014) 2564 resected periampullary adenocarcinomas at a single institution: trends over three decades. HPB (Oxford) 16:83–90 He J, Ahuja N, Makary NA et al (2014) 2564 resected periampullary adenocarcinomas at a single institution: trends over three decades. HPB (Oxford) 16:83–90
37.
go back to reference Myatra S, Divatia JV, Jibhkate B et al (2011) Preoperative assessment and optimization in periampullary and pancreatic cancer. Indian J Cancer 48:86–93PubMed Myatra S, Divatia JV, Jibhkate B et al (2011) Preoperative assessment and optimization in periampullary and pancreatic cancer. Indian J Cancer 48:86–93PubMed
38.
go back to reference Hanna MA, Feld M, Sampliner JE (2001) Preoperative Cardiac assessment of the candidate for major resective pancreatic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 81:575–578PubMed Hanna MA, Feld M, Sampliner JE (2001) Preoperative Cardiac assessment of the candidate for major resective pancreatic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 81:575–578PubMed
39.
go back to reference Agarwal V, Thomas MJ, Joshi R et al (2018) Improved outcomes in 394 pancreatic cancer resections: the impact of enhanced recovery pathway. J Gastrointest Surg. 22:1732–1742PubMed Agarwal V, Thomas MJ, Joshi R et al (2018) Improved outcomes in 394 pancreatic cancer resections: the impact of enhanced recovery pathway. J Gastrointest Surg. 22:1732–1742PubMed
40.
go back to reference Sirohi B, Chalkidou K, Pramesh CS et al (2018) Developing institutions for cancer care in low-income and middle-income countries: from cancer units to comprehensive cancer centres. Lancet Oncol 19:398–408 Sirohi B, Chalkidou K, Pramesh CS et al (2018) Developing institutions for cancer care in low-income and middle-income countries: from cancer units to comprehensive cancer centres. Lancet Oncol 19:398–408
41.
go back to reference Vinchurkar K, Pattanshetti VM, Tagole M et al (2018) Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy at low-volume centre in tier-ii city of India. Indian J Surg. Oncol 9:220–224PubMedPubMedCentral Vinchurkar K, Pattanshetti VM, Tagole M et al (2018) Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy at low-volume centre in tier-ii city of India. Indian J Surg. Oncol 9:220–224PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Tseng JF, Pisters PW, Lee JE et al (2007) The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery 141:456–463PubMed Tseng JF, Pisters PW, Lee JE et al (2007) The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery 141:456–463PubMed
43.
go back to reference Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M et al (1995) Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 222:638–645PubMedPubMedCentral Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M et al (1995) Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 222:638–645PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM et al (1995) The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg 221:43–49PubMedPubMedCentral Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM et al (1995) The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg 221:43–49PubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137PubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137PubMed
46.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127PubMed Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127PubMed
47.
go back to reference Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Salvia R et al (2011) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: the Verona experience. Surg Today 41:463–470PubMed Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Salvia R et al (2011) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: the Verona experience. Surg Today 41:463–470PubMed
48.
go back to reference Rosemurgy A, Cowgill S, Coe B et al (2008) Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy continues to determine length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 12:442–449PubMed Rosemurgy A, Cowgill S, Coe B et al (2008) Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy continues to determine length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 12:442–449PubMed
49.
go back to reference Shukla PJ, Barreto G, Shrikhande SV (2011) The evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1409–1412PubMed Shukla PJ, Barreto G, Shrikhande SV (2011) The evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1409–1412PubMed
50.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV (2013) Whipple resection: the need for specialization, standardization and centralization. South Asian J Cancer 2:158–159PubMedPubMedCentral Shrikhande SV (2013) Whipple resection: the need for specialization, standardization and centralization. South Asian J Cancer 2:158–159PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Basavaiah G, Rent PD, Rent EG et al (2018) Financial impact of complex cancer surgery in india: a study of pancreatic cancer. J Glob Oncol 4:1–9PubMed Basavaiah G, Rent PD, Rent EG et al (2018) Financial impact of complex cancer surgery in india: a study of pancreatic cancer. J Glob Oncol 4:1–9PubMed
Metadata
Title
Twelve Hundred Consecutive Pancreato-Duodenectomies from Single Centre: Impact of Centre of Excellence on Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Across India
Authors
Shailesh V. Shrikhande
Rajesh S. Shinde
Vikram A. Chaudhari
Sagar R. Kurunkar
Ashwin L. Desouza
Vandana Agarwal
Manish S. Bhandare
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05235-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

World Journal of Surgery 8/2020 Go to the issue