Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Computed Tomography | Pancreas

Prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy

Authors: Seung-seob Kim, Sunyoung Lee, Hee Seung Lee, Seungmin Bang, Mi-Suk Park

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To identify common and unique pre-treatment prognostic factors in patients with borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), treated with chemotherapy (CTx) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods

We enrolled 215 patients with BR/LA PDAC, who were treated with either CTx (n = 82) or CRT (n = 133) as a first-line treatment between 2013 and 2016. Clinical data and CT imaging findings for predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox regression analysis.

Results

Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 > 1000 U/mL (hazard ratio [HR] 1.91; p = 0.001) and non-homogeneous enhancement (HR 1.95; p < 0.001) were associated with shorter OS in all study populations. There was no significant difference in median OS (15.3 vs 16.8 months, p = 0.297) and PFS (10.0 vs 11.7 months, p = 0.321) between the CTx and CRT groups. Non-homogeneous enhancement (HR 2.04; p = 0.006) and presence of positive lymph node on CT (HR 2.38; p = 0.036) were associated with poor OS in the CTx group, while CA 19-9 > 1000 U/mL (HR 2.38; p = 0.001) and non-homogeneous enhancement (HR 1.73; p = 0.006) were independent predictors for poor OS in the CRT group.

Conclusion

Enhancement pattern on CT was a common prognostic factor for patients with PDAC treated with either CTx or CRT. Presence of positive lymph nodes on CT was a poor prognostic factor for the CTx group only, whereas CA 19-9 > 1000 U/mL was a poor prognostic factor for the CRT group only.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
14.
go back to reference Sultana A, Tudur Smith C, Cunningham D, Starling N, Tait D, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P (2007) Systematic review, including meta-analyses, on the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer using radiation/combined modality therapy. Br J Cancer 96(8):1183-1190. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sultana A, Tudur Smith C, Cunningham D, Starling N, Tait D, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P (2007) Systematic review, including meta-analyses, on the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer using radiation/combined modality therapy. Br J Cancer 96(8):1183-1190. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​sj.​bjc.​6603719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Shi S, Yu X (2019) Selecting chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Far away or so close? Semin Oncol 46(1):39-47. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.12.004Shi S, Yu X (2019) Selecting chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Far away or so close? Semin Oncol 46(1):39-47. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.12.004CrossRefPubMed Shi S, Yu X (2019) Selecting chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Far away or so close? Semin Oncol 46(1):39-47. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1053/​j.​seminoncol.​2018.​12.​004Shi S, Yu X (2019) Selecting chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Far away or so close? Semin Oncol 46(1):39-47. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1053/​j.​seminoncol.​2018.​12.​004CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kamarajah SK, Burns WR, Frankel TL, Cho CS, Nathan H (2017) Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24(7):2023-2030. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5810-x Kamarajah SK, Burns WR, Frankel TL, Cho CS, Nathan H (2017) Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24(7):2023-2030. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-017-5810-x
19.
go back to reference Edge SB, Edge SB, American Joint Committee on C (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual 8th ed. Springer., New York Edge SB, Edge SB, American Joint Committee on C (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual 8th ed. Springer., New York
25.
go back to reference Haas M, Heinemann V, Kullmann F, Laubender RP, Klose C, Bruns CJ, Holdenrieder S, Modest DP, Schulz C, Boeck S (2013) Prognostic value of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, LDH and bilirubin levels in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from a multicenter, pooled analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139(4):681-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1371-3CrossRefPubMed Haas M, Heinemann V, Kullmann F, Laubender RP, Klose C, Bruns CJ, Holdenrieder S, Modest DP, Schulz C, Boeck S (2013) Prognostic value of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, LDH and bilirubin levels in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from a multicenter, pooled analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139(4):681-689. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00432-012-1371-3CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy
Authors
Seung-seob Kim
Sunyoung Lee
Hee Seung Lee
Seungmin Bang
Mi-Suk Park
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02661-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Abdominal Radiology 2/2021 Go to the issue

SAR DFP Report

GI Bleed DFP report