Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | COVID-19 | Perspective

CT colonography’s role in the COVID-19 pandemic: a safe(r), socially distanced total colon examination

Authors: Courtney C. Moreno, Judy Yee, Firas S. Ahmed, Matthew A. Barish, Cecelia Brewington, Abraham H. Dachman, Marc J. Gollub, David H. Kim, Elizabeth McFarland, Perry J. Pickhardt, Syam Reddy, Michael Zalis, Kevin J. Chang

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the favorable procedural profile of CT colonography (CTC) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

Postponement of cancer screening due to COVID-19 has resulted in a backlog of individuals needing to undergo structural examination of the colon. The experience during the initial COVID-19 surge with urgent evaluation of the colon for transplant patients prior to transplant suggests that CTC can be done in a lower risk manner as compared to other structural examinations. The procedural profile of CTC is advantageous during this pandemic as maintaining social distancing and preserving healthcare supplies including PPE are of paramount importance. CTC is an important option to utilize in the screening armamentarium to allow effective screening of average risk asymptomatic individuals in the COVID-19 era.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthcare Facilities: Preparing for Community Transmission. 2/29/2020 (Accessed April 25, 2020) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthcare Facilities: Preparing for Community Transmission. 2/29/2020 (Accessed April 25, 2020)
5.
go back to reference Sun LH. CDC director warns second wave of coronavirus is likely to be even more devastating. The Washington Post. April 21, 2020. Sun LH. CDC director warns second wave of coronavirus is likely to be even more devastating. The Washington Post. April 21, 2020.
8.
go back to reference Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, et al. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med 2020;382:929-936.CrossRef Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, et al. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med 2020;382:929-936.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bellini D, Rengo M, De Cecco CN, Iafrate F, Hassan C, Laghi A. Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1487-1496.CrossRef Bellini D, Rengo M, De Cecco CN, Iafrate F, Hassan C, Laghi A. Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1487-1496.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Arora G, Mannalithara A, Singh G, Gerson LB, Triadafilopoulos G. Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:654-664.CrossRef Arora G, Mannalithara A, Singh G, Gerson LB, Triadafilopoulos G. Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:654-664.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:849-857.CrossRef Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:849-857.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ranasinghe I, Parzynski CS, Searfoss R, et al. Differences in colonoscopy quality among facilities: development of a post-colonoscopy risk-standardized rate of unplanned hospital visits. Gastroenterology 2016;150:103-113.CrossRef Ranasinghe I, Parzynski CS, Searfoss R, et al. Differences in colonoscopy quality among facilities: development of a post-colonoscopy risk-standardized rate of unplanned hospital visits. Gastroenterology 2016;150:103-113.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1403-1412.CrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1403-1412.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Moreno CC, Fibus TF, Krupinski EA, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Addressing racial disparity in colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: experience in an African-American cohort. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018;17:e363-e367.CrossRef Moreno CC, Fibus TF, Krupinski EA, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Addressing racial disparity in colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: experience in an African-American cohort. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018;17:e363-e367.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Barish, MA, Choi JR, et al. CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus Proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3-9.CrossRef Zalis ME, Barish, MA, Choi JR, et al. CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus Proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3-9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1287-1297.CrossRef Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1287-1297.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Moreno CC, Duszak R, Yee J, Horny M. Geographic dispersion and rural versus urban utilization of CT colonography in the United States. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17:475-483.CrossRef Moreno CC, Duszak R, Yee J, Horny M. Geographic dispersion and rural versus urban utilization of CT colonography in the United States. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17:475-483.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Koh HK, Sebelius KG. Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1296-1299.CrossRef Koh HK, Sebelius KG. Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1296-1299.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2016;315:2564-2575.CrossRef US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2016;315:2564-2575.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sawhney TG, Pyenson BS, Rotter D, Berrios M, Yee J. Computed tomography colonography less costly than colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening of commercially insured patients. Am Health Drug Benefits 2018;11:353-361.PubMedPubMedCentral Sawhney TG, Pyenson BS, Rotter D, Berrios M, Yee J. Computed tomography colonography less costly than colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening of commercially insured patients. Am Health Drug Benefits 2018;11:353-361.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Cheung KS, Hung IFN, Chan PPT, et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection and virus load in fecal samples from the Hong Kong Cohort and Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology Cheung KS, Hung IFN, Chan PPT, et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection and virus load in fecal samples from the Hong Kong Cohort and Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology
25.
go back to reference ACR-SAR-SCBT-MR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Computed Tomography (CT) Colonography in Adults. Revised 2019. ACR-SAR-SCBT-MR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Computed Tomography (CT) Colonography in Adults. Revised 2019.
Metadata
Title
CT colonography’s role in the COVID-19 pandemic: a safe(r), socially distanced total colon examination
Authors
Courtney C. Moreno
Judy Yee
Firas S. Ahmed
Matthew A. Barish
Cecelia Brewington
Abraham H. Dachman
Marc J. Gollub
David H. Kim
Elizabeth McFarland
Perry J. Pickhardt
Syam Reddy
Michael Zalis
Kevin J. Chang
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02674-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Abdominal Radiology 2/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.