Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Hepatobiliary

Clinicians and surgeon survey regarding current and future versions of CT/MRI LI-RADS

Authors: Abdullah O. Alenazi, Khaled M. Elsayes, Robert M. Marks, Joseph H. Yacoub, Elizabeth M. Hecht, Victoria Chernyak, Satheesh Krishna, Venkatesh Surabhi, James T. Lee, Ryan Ash, Irene Cruite, Ania Z. Kielar

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine preferences of clinicians and surgeons regarding radiology reporting of liver observations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Members of the American College of Radiology Liver Imaging and Data Reporting System (LI-RADS) Outreach & Education Group (30 members) as well as Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease-Focused Panel on HCC diagnosis (27 members) created and distributed an 18-question survey to clinicians and surgeons, with focus on preferences regarding radiology reporting of liver observations in patients. The survey questions were directed to physician demographics, current use of LI-RADS by their local radiologists, their opinions about current LI-RADS and potential improvements.

Results

A total of 152 physicians responded, 66.4% (101/152) from North America, including 42 surgeons, 81 physicians and 29 interventional radiologists. Participants were predominantly from academic centers 83% (126/152), while 13.8% (21/152) worked in private/community centers and 3.2% (5/152) worked in a hybrid practice. Almost 90% (136/152) of participants preferred the use of LI-RADS (compared to nothing or other standardized reporting systems; OPTN and AASLD) to communicate liver-related observations. However, only 28.5% (43/152) of participants input was sought at the time of implementing LI-RADS in their institutions. Fifty-eight percent (88/152) of all participants found standardized LI-RADS management recommendations in radiology reports to be clinically helpful. However, a subgroup analysis of surgeons in academic centers showed that 61.8% (21/34) prefer not to receive standardized LI-RADS recommendations.

Conclusions

Most participants preferred the use LI-RADS in reporting CT and MRI examination. When considering inclusion of management recommendations, radiologists should consult with their referring physicians, as preference may differ.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
8.
go back to reference Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, et al. Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Purpose and Scope. 2018;68(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29913 Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, et al. Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Purpose and Scope. 2018;68(2). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hep.​29913
Metadata
Title
Clinicians and surgeon survey regarding current and future versions of CT/MRI LI-RADS
Authors
Abdullah O. Alenazi
Khaled M. Elsayes
Robert M. Marks
Joseph H. Yacoub
Elizabeth M. Hecht
Victoria Chernyak
Satheesh Krishna
Venkatesh Surabhi
James T. Lee
Ryan Ash
Irene Cruite
Ania Z. Kielar
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02544-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Abdominal Radiology 8/2020 Go to the issue