Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Peritonitis | Interventional Radiology

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients at higher risk for adverse events: experience from a tertiary care referral center

Authors: Pankaj Gupta, Muniraju Maralakunte, Seema Rathee, Jayanta Samanta, Vishal Sharma, Harshal Mandavdhare, Saroj K. Sinha, Usha Dutta, Rakesh Kochhar

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite advances in endoscopic drainage procedures, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) remains an essential interventional radiology (IR) procedure. Several factors may adversely affect the success of PTBD. We report the experience of our IR unit with PTBD in patients considered at higher risk for adverse events.

Material

Consecutive PTBDs performed between November 2017 and April 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients at increased risk for adverse events from PTBD, defined by one or more of the following factors: non-dilated system, moderate amount of perihepatic fluid, coagulopathy, altered sensorium, and PTBD performed at bedside, were identified. Technical success, complications, and outcome at 3 months were recorded.

Results

During the study period, PTBDs were performed in 90 patients. PTBDs in 57 (63.3%) patients (mean age 47.6 years, 35 females) were identified as predisposing to higher risk for adverse events. Left and right PTBD were performed in 37 (64.9%) and 15 (26.3%) patients, respectively. Bilateral PTBDs were performed in three (5.2%) patients. In two (3.5%) cases, biliary access was obtained via percutaneous cholecystostomy. Overall technical success of 91.2% (n = 52) was achieved. Carcinoma gallbladder was the most common underlying cause. Non-dilated ductal system was the most common condition deemed to predispose to higher risk for adverse events (n = 32, 56.1%), followed by perihepatic fluid (n = 9, 15.8%), and deranged coagulation parameters (n = 9, 15.8%). PTBD was performed at bedside in intensive care unit in 5 (8.8%) patients. Two (3.5%) patients had altered sensorium. Major complications in the form of biliary peritonitis were observed in three (5.2%) patients. No procedure-related mortality was observed.

Conclusion

PTBD can be effectively and safely performed even in situations deemed to predispose patients to increased risk for adverse events. Thus, the mere presence of these conditions should not cause a denial of PTBD.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saad WE, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, Kundu S, Cardella JF. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:789-95.CrossRef Saad WE, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, Kundu S, Cardella JF. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:789-95.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Funaki B. Percutaneous Biliary Drainage. Semin Intervent Radiol 2007;24:268-71.CrossRef Funaki B. Percutaneous Biliary Drainage. Semin Intervent Radiol 2007;24:268-71.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gwon DI, Laasch HU. Radiological approach to benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Interv 2015;4:9-14.CrossRef Gwon DI, Laasch HU. Radiological approach to benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Interv 2015;4:9-14.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, et al. Standards of Practice Committee, with Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Endorsement. Consensus Guidelines for Periprocedural Management of Coagulation Status and Hemostasis Risk in Percutaneous Image-guided Interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;23:727-36. Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, et al. Standards of Practice Committee, with Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Endorsement. Consensus Guidelines for Periprocedural Management of Coagulation Status and Hemostasis Risk in Percutaneous Image-guided Interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;23:727-36.
5.
go back to reference Kühn JP, Busemann A, Lerch MM, Heidecke CD, Hosten N, Puls R. Percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts compared with patients with dilated intrahepatic bile ducts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:851–7.CrossRef Kühn JP, Busemann A, Lerch MM, Heidecke CD, Hosten N, Puls R. Percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts compared with patients with dilated intrahepatic bile ducts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:851–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Teplick SK, Flick P, Brandon JC. Transhepatic cholangiography in patients with suspected biliary disease and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Gastrointest Radiol 1991;16:193–7.CrossRef Teplick SK, Flick P, Brandon JC. Transhepatic cholangiography in patients with suspected biliary disease and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Gastrointest Radiol 1991;16:193–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Funaki B, Zaleski GX, Straus CA, et al. Percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1541–4.CrossRef Funaki B, Zaleski GX, Straus CA, et al. Percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1541–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hayashi N, Sakai T, Kitagawa M, Kimoto T, Inagaki R, Ishii Y. US-guided left sided biliary drainage: nine-year experience. Radiology 1997;204:119-22.CrossRef Hayashi N, Sakai T, Kitagawa M, Kimoto T, Inagaki R, Ishii Y. US-guided left sided biliary drainage: nine-year experience. Radiology 1997;204:119-22.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Elias E. Cholangiography in the jaundiced patient. Gut 1976;17:801–11.PubMed Elias E. Cholangiography in the jaundiced patient. Gut 1976;17:801–11.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Weber A, Gaa J, Rosca B, et al. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with dilated and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:412-7.CrossRef Weber A, Gaa J, Rosca B, et al. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with dilated and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:412-7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bonshock R, McLaughlin S, Duncan C et al. Complication rates of percutaneous biliary drainage in the presence of ascites. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017;28:S54.CrossRef Bonshock R, McLaughlin S, Duncan C et al. Complication rates of percutaneous biliary drainage in the presence of ascites. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017;28:S54.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hamada T, Yasunaga H, Nakai Y et al. Severe bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic drainage of the biliary system: effect of antithrombotic agents—analysis of 34 606 cases from a Japanese nationwide administrative database. Radiology 2015;274:605-13.CrossRef Hamada T, Yasunaga H, Nakai Y et al. Severe bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic drainage of the biliary system: effect of antithrombotic agents—analysis of 34 606 cases from a Japanese nationwide administrative database. Radiology 2015;274:605-13.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kimura Y, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 current terminology, etiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepato-biliary Pancreat Sci 2013;20:8-23CrossRef Kimura Y, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 current terminology, etiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepato-biliary Pancreat Sci 2013;20:8-23CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lai EC, Mok FP, Tan ES et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1992;24:1582–6.CrossRef Lai EC, Mok FP, Tan ES et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1992;24:1582–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Leung JW, Chung SC, Sung JJ, Banez VP, Li AK. Urgent endoscopic drainage for acute suppurative cholangitis. Lancet 1989;10:1307-9.CrossRef Leung JW, Chung SC, Sung JJ, Banez VP, Li AK. Urgent endoscopic drainage for acute suppurative cholangitis. Lancet 1989;10:1307-9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boender J, Nix GA, de Ridder MA et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and biliary drainage in patients with cholangitis due to common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:233–8.PubMed Boender J, Nix GA, de Ridder MA et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and biliary drainage in patients with cholangitis due to common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:233–8.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lau JY, Chung SC, Leung JW, Ling TK, Yung MY, Li AK. Endoscopic drainage aborts endotoxaemia in acute cholangitis. Br J Surg 1996;83:181–4.CrossRef Lau JY, Chung SC, Leung JW, Ling TK, Yung MY, Li AK. Endoscopic drainage aborts endotoxaemia in acute cholangitis. Br J Surg 1996;83:181–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients at higher risk for adverse events: experience from a tertiary care referral center
Authors
Pankaj Gupta
Muniraju Maralakunte
Seema Rathee
Jayanta Samanta
Vishal Sharma
Harshal Mandavdhare
Saroj K. Sinha
Usha Dutta
Rakesh Kochhar
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02344-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Abdominal Radiology 8/2020 Go to the issue