Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Pleural Effusion | Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Bare area sign

Authors: Venkatraman Indiran, Jagannathan Kokilavani

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

The posterosuperior aspect of the liver, adjacent to the posterior body wall, is not covered by peritoneum, resulting in the so-called “bare area” [1]. It is a large triangular area on the diaphragmatic surface of the liver which is attached directly to the diaphragm by loose connective tissue (Figs. 1, 2). As the bare area is devoid of peritoneum and due to the restriction of peritoneal fluid by the coronary ligaments, fluid at that site cannot be ascites, but only pleural effusion. This is called as the bare area sign (Fig. 3) [2]. Halvorsen et al., in their blinded analysis of multiple cases, concluded that no single sign was reliable, but, when all four signs (the diaphragm sign, the displaced crus sign, the interface sign, and the bare area sign) were used, accurate differentiation of ascites and pleural effusion was possible [3]. CT sections at levels above or below the bare area may cause false-positive diagnosis of ascites. Difficulty may also arise when the bare area is smaller as an anatomical variant [2]. Bare area sign is not valid in patients with liver transplantation, owing to the surgical removal of the normal peritoneal reflections [4].
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Halvorsen RA, Fedyshin PJ, Korobkin M, Foster WL Jr, Thompson WM. (1986) Ascites or pleural effusion? CT differentiation: four useful criteria. Radiographics.;6(1):135-149.CrossRefPubMed Halvorsen RA, Fedyshin PJ, Korobkin M, Foster WL Jr, Thompson WM. (1986) Ascites or pleural effusion? CT differentiation: four useful criteria. Radiographics.;6(1):135-149.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Halvorsen RA, Fedyshin PJ, Korobkin M, Thompson WM. (1986) CT differentiation of pleural effusion from ascites. An evaluation of four signs using blinded analysis of 52 cases. Invest Radiol; 21:391-395.CrossRefPubMed Halvorsen RA, Fedyshin PJ, Korobkin M, Thompson WM. (1986) CT differentiation of pleural effusion from ascites. An evaluation of four signs using blinded analysis of 52 cases. Invest Radiol; 21:391-395.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Crossin JD, Muradali D, Wilson SR. (2003) US of liver transplants: normal and abnormal. Radiographics ;23(5):1093-1114.CrossRefPubMed Crossin JD, Muradali D, Wilson SR. (2003) US of liver transplants: normal and abnormal. Radiographics ;23(5):1093-1114.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Bare area sign
Authors
Venkatraman Indiran
Jagannathan Kokilavani
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02007-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Abdominal Radiology 7/2019 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

The stalk-of-corn sign of ureter