Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2014

01-06-2014

CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques

Authors: Xiao-Zhu Lin, Haruhiko Machida, Isao Tanaka RT, Rika Fukui RT, Eiko Ueno, Ke-Min Chen, Fu-Hua Yan

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare CT images of the pancreas reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR), and filtered back projection (FBP) techniques for image quality and pancreatic duct (PD) depiction. Data from 40 patients with contrast-enhanced abdominal CT [CTDIvol: 10.3 ± 3.0 (mGy)] during the late arterial phase were reconstructed with FBP, 40% ASiR–FBP blending, and MBIR. Two radiologists assessed the depiction of the main PD, image noise, and overall image quality using 5-point scale independently. Objective CT value and noise were measured in the pancreatic parenchyma, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the PD was calculated. The Friedman test and post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni test following one-way ANOVA were used for qualitative and quantitative assessment, respectively. For the subjective assessment, scores for MBIR were significantly higher than those for FBP and 40% ASiR (all P < 0.001). No significant differences in CT values of the pancreatic parenchyma were noted among FBP, 40% ASiR, and MBIR images (P > 0.05). Objective image noise was significantly lower and CNR of the PD was higher with MBIR than with FBP and 40% ASiR (all P < 0.05). Our results suggest that pancreatic CT images reconstructed with MBIR have lower image noise, better image quality, and higher conspicuity and CNR of the PD compared with FBP and ASiR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrell MA, et al. (2003) Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 229(1):81–90PubMedCrossRef Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrell MA, et al. (2003) Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 229(1):81–90PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brennan DD, Zamboni GA, Raptopoulos VD, et al. (2007) Comprehensive preoperative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 64-section volumetric CT. RadioGraphics 27(6):1653–1666PubMedCrossRef Brennan DD, Zamboni GA, Raptopoulos VD, et al. (2007) Comprehensive preoperative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 64-section volumetric CT. RadioGraphics 27(6):1653–1666PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Nakaizumi A, Ioka T, et al. (2002) Main pancreatic duct dilatation: a sign of high risk for pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 32:407–411PubMedCrossRef Tanaka S, Nakaizumi A, Ioka T, et al. (2002) Main pancreatic duct dilatation: a sign of high risk for pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 32:407–411PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fernández-del CC, Targarona J, Thayer SP, et al. (2003) Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 138:427–434CrossRef Fernández-del CC, Targarona J, Thayer SP, et al. (2003) Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 138:427–434CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Nakao M, Ioka T, et al. (2010) Slight dilatation of the main pancreatic duct and presence of pancreatic cysts as predictive signs of pancreatic cancer: a prospective study. Radiology 254(3):965–972PubMedCrossRef Tanaka S, Nakao M, Ioka T, et al. (2010) Slight dilatation of the main pancreatic duct and presence of pancreatic cysts as predictive signs of pancreatic cancer: a prospective study. Radiology 254(3):965–972PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ishii H, Taniguchi H, Shiozaki A, et al. (2012) Use of multidetector-row computed tomography to evaluate branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: influence on surgical decision-making. Hepatogastroenterology 59(115):884–888PubMed Ishii H, Taniguchi H, Shiozaki A, et al. (2012) Use of multidetector-row computed tomography to evaluate branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: influence on surgical decision-making. Hepatogastroenterology 59(115):884–888PubMed
7.
go back to reference Tan L, Zhao YE, Wang DB, et al. (2009) Imaging features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas in multi-detector row computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 15(32):4037–4043PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tan L, Zhao YE, Wang DB, et al. (2009) Imaging features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas in multi-detector row computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 15(32):4037–4043PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Takeshita K, Kutomi K, Takada K, et al. (2008) Differential diagnosis of benign or malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas by multidetector row helical computed tomography: evaluation of predictive factors by logistic regression analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(2):191–197PubMedCrossRef Takeshita K, Kutomi K, Takada K, et al. (2008) Differential diagnosis of benign or malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas by multidetector row helical computed tomography: evaluation of predictive factors by logistic regression analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(2):191–197PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kawamoto S, Lawler LP, Horton KM, et al. (2006) MDCT of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: evaluation of features predictive of invasive carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(3):687–695PubMedCrossRef Kawamoto S, Lawler LP, Horton KM, et al. (2006) MDCT of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: evaluation of features predictive of invasive carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(3):687–695PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shepp LA, Vardi Y (1982) Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1(2):113–122PubMedCrossRef Shepp LA, Vardi Y (1982) Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1(2):113–122PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lange K, Carson R (1984) EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(2):306–316PubMed Lange K, Carson R (1984) EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(2):306–316PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kak AC (1984) Image reconstruction from projections. In: Ekstrom M (ed) Digital image processing techniques. New York: Academic Press Kak AC (1984) Image reconstruction from projections. In: Ekstrom M (ed) Digital image processing techniques. New York: Academic Press
13.
go back to reference Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(3):764–771PubMedCrossRef Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(3):764–771PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):126–131PubMedCrossRef Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):126–131PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Investig Radiol 45(4):202–210CrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Investig Radiol 45(4):202–210CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257(2):373–383PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257(2):373–383PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nelson RC, Feuerlein S, Boll DT (2011) New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5(5):286–292PubMedCrossRef Nelson RC, Feuerlein S, Boll DT (2011) New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5(5):286–292PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Suzuki S, Machida H, Tanaka I, et al. (2012) Measurement of vascular wall attenuation: comparison of CT angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction with standard filtered back-projection algorithm CT in vitro. Eur J Radiol 81(11):3348–3353PubMedCrossRef Suzuki S, Machida H, Tanaka I, et al. (2012) Measurement of vascular wall attenuation: comparison of CT angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction with standard filtered back-projection algorithm CT in vitro. Eur J Radiol 81(11):3348–3353PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Schlett CL, et al. (2012) Coronary artery plaques: cardiac CT with model-based and adaptive-statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur J Radiol 81(3):e363–e369PubMedCrossRef Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Schlett CL, et al. (2012) Coronary artery plaques: cardiac CT with model-based and adaptive-statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur J Radiol 81(3):e363–e369PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, et al. (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22(8):1613–1623PubMedCrossRef Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, et al. (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22(8):1613–1623PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, et al. (2010) Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience. Radiology 254:145–153PubMedCrossRef Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, et al. (2010) Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience. Radiology 254:145–153PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, et al. (2012) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 22(1):138–143PubMedCrossRef Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, et al. (2012) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 22(1):138–143PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719PubMedCrossRef Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B, et al. (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B, et al. (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cornfeld D, Israel G, Detroy E, et al. (2011) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W336–W340PubMedCrossRef Cornfeld D, Israel G, Detroy E, et al. (2011) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W336–W340PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, et al. (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, et al. (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, et al. (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:40–45PubMedCrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, et al. (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:40–45PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, et al. (2001) Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 220(1):97–102PubMedCrossRef McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, et al. (2001) Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 220(1):97–102PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. (2006) Pancreas: optimal scan delay for contrast enhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 241(1):167–174PubMedCrossRef Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. (2006) Pancreas: optimal scan delay for contrast enhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 241(1):167–174PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Nishibori H, et al. (2011) MDCT of the pancreas: comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images. Radiology 260(1):139–147PubMedCrossRef Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Nishibori H, et al. (2011) MDCT of the pancreas: comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images. Radiology 260(1):139–147PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F, et al. (2012) Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments—a phantom approach. Phys Med. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.12.004 Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F, et al. (2012) Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments—a phantom approach. Phys Med. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejmp.​2011.​12.​004
33.
go back to reference Husarik DB, Marin D, Samei E, et al. (2012) Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go? Investig Radiol 47(8):468–474CrossRef Husarik DB, Marin D, Samei E, et al. (2012) Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go? Investig Radiol 47(8):468–474CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, et al. (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, et al. (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Thibault JB, Bouman CA, et al. (2011) Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogenous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process 20:161–175CrossRef Zhou Y, Thibault JB, Bouman CA, et al. (2011) Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogenous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process 20:161–175CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Budovec J, Thibault JB, Foley WD (2008) Analysis of a Bayesian statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for multidetector computed tomography. In: Proceedings of SCBT-MR. Budovec J, Thibault JB, Foley WD (2008) Analysis of a Bayesian statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for multidetector computed tomography. In: Proceedings of SCBT-MR.
37.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S, et al. (2012) Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36(3):347–353PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S, et al. (2012) Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36(3):347–353PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. (2012) Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1266–1274PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. (2012) Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1266–1274PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Yasaka K, Katsura M, Akahane M, et al. (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Springerplus 2(1):209PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Yasaka K, Katsura M, Akahane M, et al. (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Springerplus 2(1):209PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques
Authors
Xiao-Zhu Lin
Haruhiko Machida
Isao Tanaka RT
Rika Fukui RT
Eiko Ueno
Ke-Min Chen
Fu-Hua Yan
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0081-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Abdominal Radiology 3/2014 Go to the issue