Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2021

Open Access 01-09-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article

18F FDG PET/MRI with hepatocyte-specific contrast agent for M staging of rectal cancer: a primary economic evaluation

Authors: Felix G. Gassert, Johannes Rübenthaler, Clemens C. Cyran, Johann S. Rink, Vincent Schwarze, Johanna Luitjens, Florian T. Gassert, Marcus R. Makowski, Stefan O. Schoenberg, Marius E. Mayerhoefer, Dietmar Tamandl, Matthias F. Froelich

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 10/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Rectal cancer is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the world. Correct identification of the TNM state in primary staging of rectal cancer has critical implications on patient management. Initial evaluations revealed a high sensitivity and specificity for whole-body PET/MRI in the detection of metastases allowing for metastasis-directed therapy regimens. Nevertheless, its cost-effectiveness compared with that of standard-of-care imaging (SCI) using pelvic MRI + chest and abdominopelvic CT is yet to be investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of whole-body 18F FDG PET/MRI as an alternative imaging method to standard diagnostic workup for initial staging of rectal cancer.

Methods

For estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs of diagnostic modalities, a decision model including whole-body 18F FDG PET/MRI with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent and pelvic MRI + chest and abdominopelvic CT was created based on Markov simulations. For obtaining model input parameters, review of recent literature was performed. Willingness to pay (WTP) was set to $100,000/QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters and costs was applied, and probabilistic sensitivity was determined using Monte Carlo modeling.

Results

In the base-case scenario, the strategy whole-body 18F FDG PET/MRI resulted in total costs of $52,186 whereas total costs of SCI were at $51,672. Whole-body 18F FDG PET/MRI resulted in an expected effectiveness of 3.542 QALYs versus 3.535 QALYs for SCI. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $70,291 per QALY for PET/MRI. Thus, from an economic point of view, whole-body 18F FDG PET/MRI was identified as an adequate diagnostic alternative to SCI with high robustness of results to variation of input parameters.

Conclusion

Based on the results of the analysis, use of whole-body 18F FDG PET/MRI was identified as a feasible diagnostic strategy for initial staging of rectal cancer from a cost-effectiveness perspective.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Noone AM HN, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2015, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018. 2018. Noone AM HN, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2015, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://​seer.​cancer.​gov/​csr/​1975_​2015/​, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018. 2018.
11.
go back to reference Arias E, Xu J, Kochanek KD. United States Life Tables, 2016. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Nat Vital Stat Syst. 2019;68:1–66. Arias E, Xu J, Kochanek KD. United States Life Tables, 2016. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Nat Vital Stat Syst. 2019;68:1–66.
17.
go back to reference Fiori E, Lamazza A, Sterpetti AV, Crocetti D, De Felice F, Di Muzio M, et al. Quality of life for patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: randomized controlled trial comparing resection versus endoscopic stenting. In vivo (Athens, Greece). 2019;33:2065–70. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11705.CrossRef Fiori E, Lamazza A, Sterpetti AV, Crocetti D, De Felice F, Di Muzio M, et al. Quality of life for patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: randomized controlled trial comparing resection versus endoscopic stenting. In vivo (Athens, Greece). 2019;33:2065–70. https://​doi.​org/​10.​21873/​invivo.​11705.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lintoiu-Ursut B, Tulin A, Constantinoiu S. Recurrence after hepatic resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis -review article. J Med Life. 2015;8 Spec Issue:12–4.PubMed Lintoiu-Ursut B, Tulin A, Constantinoiu S. Recurrence after hepatic resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis -review article. J Med Life. 2015;8 Spec Issue:12–4.PubMed
25.
27.
go back to reference Queiroz MA, Ortega CD, Ferreira FR, Nahas SC, Cerri GG, Buchpiguel CA. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/MRI versus pelvic MRI and thoracic and abdominal CT for detecting synchronous distant metastases in rectal cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04911-x. Queiroz MA, Ortega CD, Ferreira FR, Nahas SC, Cerri GG, Buchpiguel CA. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/MRI versus pelvic MRI and thoracic and abdominal CT for detecting synchronous distant metastases in rectal cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-020-04911-x.
Metadata
Title
18F FDG PET/MRI with hepatocyte-specific contrast agent for M staging of rectal cancer: a primary economic evaluation
Authors
Felix G. Gassert
Johannes Rübenthaler
Clemens C. Cyran
Johann S. Rink
Vincent Schwarze
Johanna Luitjens
Florian T. Gassert
Marcus R. Makowski
Stefan O. Schoenberg
Marius E. Mayerhoefer
Dietmar Tamandl
Matthias F. Froelich
Publication date
01-09-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 10/2021
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05193-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2021

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2021 Go to the issue