Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients considered eligible for hepatic resection and/or local ablation

Authors: Kim Sivesgaard, Lars P. Larsen, Michael Sørensen, Stine Kramer, Sven Schlander, Nerijus Amanavicius, Arindam Bharadwaz, Dennis Tønner Nielsen, Frank Viborg Mortensen, Erik Morre Pedersen

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and combined fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in patients eligible for local treatment.

Materials and methods

This health-research ethics-committee-approved prospective consecutive diagnostic accuracy study, with written informed consent, included 80 cases (76 patients, four participating twice) between 29 June 2015 and 7 February 2017. Prior chemotherapy or local treatment did not exclude participation. Combined FDG-PET/CT including CE-CT and MRI was performed within 0–3 days shortly before local treatment. CE-CT and MRI images were read independently by two readers for each modality. The combined FDG-PET/CT images were read independently by two pairs of readers. A composite reference standard was used. Sensitivities, specificities and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC) were calculated and compared.

Results

In total, 260 CRLMs were confirmed. The MRI readers had significantly higher per-lesion sensitivity (85.9% and 83.8%) than both CE-CT readers (69.1% and 62.3%) and both PET/CT reader pairs (72.0% and 72.1%) (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in per-lesion specificity. MRI readers had significantly higher AUCROC (0.92 and 0.88) than both CE-CT readers (0.80 and 0.82) (p≤0.001). AUCROC for MR reader 1 was higher than that of both PET/CT reader pairs (0.83 and 0.84) (p≤0.0001).

Conclusion

MRI performed significantly better than both CE-CT and combined FDG-PET/CT for detection of CRLM in consecutive patients eligible for local treatment irrespective of prior chemotherapy or local treatment.

Key Points

• Patients eligible for local treatment of colorectal liver-metastases require optimal imaging.
• In 80 consecutive patients, MRI had superior per lesion diagnostic performance.
• Findings were independent of prior treatment and type of planned local treatment.
• Equally, MRI had superior diagnostic performance on per segment basis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adam R, Pascal G, Azoulay D et al (2003) Liver resection for colorectal metastases: the third hepatectomy. Ann Surg 238:871–883 discussion 883–4CrossRef Adam R, Pascal G, Azoulay D et al (2003) Liver resection for colorectal metastases: the third hepatectomy. Ann Surg 238:871–883 discussion 883–4CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gillams AR, Lees WR (2009) Five-year survival in 309 patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol 19:1206–1213CrossRef Gillams AR, Lees WR (2009) Five-year survival in 309 patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol 19:1206–1213CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jones RP, Kokudo N, Folprecht G et al (2016) Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Critical Review of State of the Art. Liver Cancer 6:66–71CrossRef Jones RP, Kokudo N, Folprecht G et al (2016) Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Critical Review of State of the Art. Liver Cancer 6:66–71CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shady W, Petre EN, Gonen M et al (2016) Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors Affecting Outcomes--A 10-year Experience at a Single Center. Radiology 278:601–611CrossRef Shady W, Petre EN, Gonen M et al (2016) Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors Affecting Outcomes--A 10-year Experience at a Single Center. Radiology 278:601–611CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ricke J, Mohnike K, Pech M et al (2010) Local response and impact on survival after local ablation of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma by computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:479–485CrossRef Ricke J, Mohnike K, Pech M et al (2010) Local response and impact on survival after local ablation of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma by computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:479–485CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Berger-Kulemann V, Schima W, Baroud S et al (2012) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MR imaging versus multidetector-row CT in the detection of colorectal metastases in fatty liver using intraoperative ultrasound and histopathology as a standard of reference. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:670–676CrossRef Berger-Kulemann V, Schima W, Baroud S et al (2012) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MR imaging versus multidetector-row CT in the detection of colorectal metastases in fatty liver using intraoperative ultrasound and histopathology as a standard of reference. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:670–676CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Scharitzer M, Ba-Ssalamah A, Ringl H et al (2013) Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 23:2187–2196CrossRef Scharitzer M, Ba-Ssalamah A, Ringl H et al (2013) Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 23:2187–2196CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Lee SS, Byun JH et al (2015) Incremental Value of Liver MR Imaging in Patients with Potentially Curable Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis Detected at CT: A Prospective Comparison of Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging, and a Combination of Both MR Techniques. Radiology 274:712–722CrossRef Kim HJ, Lee SS, Byun JH et al (2015) Incremental Value of Liver MR Imaging in Patients with Potentially Curable Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis Detected at CT: A Prospective Comparison of Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging, and a Combination of Both MR Techniques. Radiology 274:712–722CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schulz A, Viktil E, Godt JC et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of CT, MRI and PET/CT in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: the superiority of MRI. Acta Radiol 57:1040–1048CrossRef Schulz A, Viktil E, Godt JC et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of CT, MRI and PET/CT in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: the superiority of MRI. Acta Radiol 57:1040–1048CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Asato N, Tsurusaki M, Sofue K et al (2017) Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases. Jpn J Radiol 35:197–205CrossRef Asato N, Tsurusaki M, Sofue K et al (2017) Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases. Jpn J Radiol 35:197–205CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jhaveri KS, Fischer SE, Hosseini-Nik H et al (2017) Prospective comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI and contrast-enhanced CT with histopathological correlation for preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases following chemotherapy and potential impact on surgical plan. HPB (Oxford) 19:992–1000CrossRef Jhaveri KS, Fischer SE, Hosseini-Nik H et al (2017) Prospective comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI and contrast-enhanced CT with histopathological correlation for preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases following chemotherapy and potential impact on surgical plan. HPB (Oxford) 19:992–1000CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, et al. (2013) Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24 Suppl 6:vi64–72.CrossRef Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, et al. (2013) Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24 Suppl 6:vi64–72.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R et al (2016) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 27:1386–1422CrossRef Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R et al (2016) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 27:1386–1422CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ, Salloum C et al (2013) Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 100:808–818CrossRef Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ, Salloum C et al (2013) Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 100:808–818CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Adam R, De Gramont A, Figueras J et al (2012) The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Oncologist, In, pp 1225–1239 Adam R, De Gramont A, Figueras J et al (2012) The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Oncologist, In, pp 1225–1239
16.
go back to reference Larsen PN, Lysholt C (2011) Kliniske retningslinier for behandling af Kolo-Rektale Levermetastaser (KRLM). Dansk Lever-Galdevejscancer Gruppe. Available via http://gicancer.dk/. Accessed 14 Nov 2017. Larsen PN, Lysholt C (2011) Kliniske retningslinier for behandling af Kolo-Rektale Levermetastaser (KRLM). Dansk Lever-Galdevejscancer Gruppe. Available via http://​gicancer.​dk/​. Accessed 14 Nov 2017.
17.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tang A, Tan J, Sun M et al (2013) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology 267:422–431CrossRef Tang A, Tan J, Sun M et al (2013) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology 267:422–431CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vu K-N, Gilbert G, Chalut M et al (2016) MRI-determined liver proton density fat fraction, with MRS validation: Comparison of regions of interest sampling methods in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1090–1099CrossRef Vu K-N, Gilbert G, Chalut M et al (2016) MRI-determined liver proton density fat fraction, with MRS validation: Comparison of regions of interest sampling methods in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1090–1099CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Genders TSS, Spronk S, Stijnen T et al (2012) Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data: a tutorial. Radiology 265:910–916CrossRef Genders TSS, Spronk S, Stijnen T et al (2012) Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data: a tutorial. Radiology 265:910–916CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vilgrain V, Esvan M, Ronot M et al (2016) A meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases. Eur Radiol 26:4595–4615CrossRef Vilgrain V, Esvan M, Ronot M et al (2016) A meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases. Eur Radiol 26:4595–4615CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG et al (2015) FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:328–354CrossRef Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG et al (2015) FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:328–354CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kulemann V, Schima W, Tamandl D et al (2011) Preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases in fatty liver: MDCT or MRI? Eur J Radiol 79:e1–e6CrossRef Kulemann V, Schima W, Tamandl D et al (2011) Preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases in fatty liver: MDCT or MRI? Eur J Radiol 79:e1–e6CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chen I, Lorentzen T, Linnemann D et al (2016) Seeding after ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy of liver metastases in patients with colorectal or breast cancer. Acta Oncol 55:638–643CrossRef Chen I, Lorentzen T, Linnemann D et al (2016) Seeding after ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy of liver metastases in patients with colorectal or breast cancer. Acta Oncol 55:638–643CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wessling J, Esseling R, Raupach R et al (2007) The effect of dose reduction and feasibility of edge-preserving noise reduction on the detection of liver lesions using MSCT. Eur Radiol 17:1885–1891CrossRef Wessling J, Esseling R, Raupach R et al (2007) The effect of dose reduction and feasibility of edge-preserving noise reduction on the detection of liver lesions using MSCT. Eur Radiol 17:1885–1891CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Weg N, Scheer MR, Gabor MP (1998) Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Radiology 209:417–426CrossRef Weg N, Scheer MR, Gabor MP (1998) Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Radiology 209:417–426CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M et al (2004) Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiology 231:413–420CrossRef Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M et al (2004) Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiology 231:413–420CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients considered eligible for hepatic resection and/or local ablation
Authors
Kim Sivesgaard
Lars P. Larsen
Michael Sørensen
Stine Kramer
Sven Schlander
Nerijus Amanavicius
Arindam Bharadwaz
Dennis Tønner Nielsen
Frank Viborg Mortensen
Erik Morre Pedersen
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5469-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

European Radiology 11/2018 Go to the issue