Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Article

Reducing Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterizations for Congenital Heart Disease

Authors: Chandni Patel, Matthew Grossman, Veronika Shabanova, Jeremy Asnes

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Ionizing radiation exposure is a necessary risk entailed during congenital cardiac catheterizations. The congenital catheterization lab at Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital employed quality improvement strategies to minimize radiation exposure in this vulnerable population. In two phases, we implemented six interventions, which included adding and utilizing lower fluoroscopy and digital angiography (DA) doses, increasing staff and physician radiation awareness, focusing on tighter collimation, and changing the default fluoroscopy and DA doses to lower settings. Post-intervention data were collected prospectively for all procedures in the congenital catheterization lab and compared to pre-intervention radiation data collected retrospectively. Radiation exposure was measured in total air kerma (mGy), dose area product per body weight (DAP/kg) (µGy m2/kg), and fluoroscopy time (min). Data were collected for a total of 312 cases. In considering all procedures, the DAP/kg decreased by 67.6% and air kerma decreased by 63%. Fluoroscopy time did not change over the study period. Significant decreases in radiation exposure (DAP/kg) by procedure type were seen for atrial septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, and transcatheter pulmonary valve procedures with a 45%, 42% and 83% decrease, respectively. Air kerma decreased significantly for ASD and PDA procedures with an 80% and 72% decrease, respectively. When compared to national benchmarks, the median DAP/kg and air kerma for these procedures are lower at our institution. The decreases continue to be sustained 2 years post-interventions. Systems-based interventions can be readily implemented in the congenital cardiac catheterization lab with dramatic and sustainable radiation dose reduction for patients.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Kobayashi D, Meadows J, Forbes TJ et al (2014) Standardizing radiation dose reporting in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory—a multicenter study by the CCISC (congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 84(5):786–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25467 CrossRef Kobayashi D, Meadows J, Forbes TJ et al (2014) Standardizing radiation dose reporting in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory—a multicenter study by the CCISC (congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 84(5):786–793. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ccd.​25467 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chida K, Ohno T, Kakizaki S et al (2010) Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1175–1179.CrossRef Chida K, Ohno T, Kakizaki S et al (2010) Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1175–1179.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shewhart WA, Deming W (1939) Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. The Graduate School of the Department of Agriculture, Washinton Shewhart WA, Deming W (1939) Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. The Graduate School of the Department of Agriculture, Washinton
8.
go back to reference Provost LP, Murray S (2011) The health care data guide: learning from data for improvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Provost LP, Murray S (2011) The health care data guide: learning from data for improvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
9.
go back to reference R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
10.
go back to reference Ghelani SJ, Glatz AC, David S et al (2014) Radiation dose benchmarks during cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease in the United States. JACC 7:1060–1069PubMed Ghelani SJ, Glatz AC, David S et al (2014) Radiation dose benchmarks during cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease in the United States. JACC 7:1060–1069PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hirshfeld JW, Balter S, Brinker JA et al (2004) ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on clinical competence and training. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(11):2259–2282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.014 CrossRefPubMed Hirshfeld JW, Balter S, Brinker JA et al (2004) ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on clinical competence and training. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(11):2259–2282. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2004.​10.​014 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reducing Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterizations for Congenital Heart Disease
Authors
Chandni Patel
Matthew Grossman
Veronika Shabanova
Jeremy Asnes
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-2039-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Pediatric Cardiology 3/2019 Go to the issue