Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Original Article

Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model

Authors: Helen Louise Preston, Zarko Alfirevic, Gillian Elizabeth Fowler, Steven Lane

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a significant complication of vaginal delivery. Water birth has become a popular preference for women giving birth in the UK, however, there is limited data on the risk of OASI following water birth. Our aim was to assess OASI risk in low-risk women giving birth in water without medical intervention compared with on land and to create a prognostic model for OASI prediction.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 15,734 low-risk women giving birth by spontaneous vaginal delivery between January 2008 and October 2014 in a midwifery-led unit (MLU). Patient factors and delivery data were analysed to identify differences between water and land births. Univariate analysis determined factors that statistically predicted OASI and was then used to create multivariate analysis. Significant multivariate factors were used to create a prognostic model to predict likelihood of OASI.

Results

OASI rates were 1.6% on land and 3.3% in water [odds ratio (OR) 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–2.94). Multivariate analysis confirmed water birth, ethnicity and parity as independent risk factors for OASI (adjusted OR water birth: 1.77 (CI 1.25–2.51). Our prognostic model showed Black and Asian primigravidae following water birth had the highest risk of OASI and white multiparae on land the lowest.

Conclusion

This study of comparable low-risk women shows an increased risk of OASI following water birth compared with land birth. Use of this prognostic model will help women determine their risk of OASI following birth in water or on land.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12363. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​1471-0528.​12363.
6.
go back to reference Anal and urinary incontinence 4 years after a vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:55–60.CrossRef Anal and urinary incontinence 4 years after a vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:55–60.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Thiagamoorthy G, Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(12):1621–7.CrossRefPubMed Thiagamoorthy G, Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(12):1621–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Baghestan E, Irgens L, Børdahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed Baghestan E, Irgens L, Børdahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:225–98.PubMed Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:225–98.PubMed
18.
go back to reference McLeod NL, Gilmour DT, Joseph KS, Farrell SA, Luther ER. Trends in major risk factors for anal sphincter lacerations: a 10-year study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25(7):586–93. McLeod NL, Gilmour DT, Joseph KS, Farrell SA, Luther ER. Trends in major risk factors for anal sphincter lacerations: a 10-year study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25(7):586–93.
20.
go back to reference Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm UB, Gåreberg B, Nyberg K, Hagberg H. Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. BJOG. 2000;107(7):926–31. Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm UB, Gåreberg B, Nyberg K, Hagberg H. Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. BJOG. 2000;107(7):926–31.
21.
go back to reference Rush J, Burlock S, Lambert K, Loosley-Millman M, Hutchison B, Enkin M. The effects of whirlpools baths in labor: a randomized, controlled trial. Birth. 1996;23(3):136–43. Rush J, Burlock S, Lambert K, Loosley-Millman M, Hutchison B, Enkin M. The effects of whirlpools baths in labor: a randomized, controlled trial. Birth. 1996;23(3):136–43.
22.
go back to reference Eckert K, Turnbull D, MacLennan A. Immersion in water in the first stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2001;28(2):84–93. Eckert K, Turnbull D, MacLennan A. Immersion in water in the first stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2001;28(2):84–93.
Metadata
Title
Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model
Authors
Helen Louise Preston
Zarko Alfirevic
Gillian Elizabeth Fowler
Steven Lane
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03879-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2019 Go to the issue